Blair apology - insincerity defined

In a press statement today in front of TV cameras, British President Tony Blair spread his evil mindset to his public.

First, he apologises to the family of the Brazilian man whom London police shot dead yesterday.

Then he goes on to say "imagine if this man had been armed with a bomb and the police had NOT shot him when they had the chance" .
With that, his public goes away thinking "ya, that makes sense, what if they DIDN'T shoot that guy, and there had been an explosion.."
" Its not like there are a lot of
'deaf Muslim-looking people wearing heavy coats in warm weather who are late for their train and are running to catch it, with cops shouting at him to stop running'
type of people around London, so shoot them. "

'"They are rare, so its not going to involve a lot of us.
They should be shot to protect the rest of us.
That is okay.
Now that Blair explained it to us. "


And so what does that apology mean after that? - He actually ISN'T sorry, and he explains why!

He is "not sorry" that it happened, it was a good measure.

So next its okay for the Youth Wing to round up certain groups of people? [harkening to hitlerisms]

This is totally wrong! Mr. Tony Blair is not the British President.
He is in fact the Prime Minister.

It's called collateral damage; and it's occured in every cinflict since time began. At least,the Brits keep the numbers down to the bare minimum. What else do you want Blair to do? Wear ashes and sackcloth!

You'll have no trouble fitting into this forum at all There are many more Doves here than us few Hawks. Hearing the Doves cry is music to my ears[apologies to Prince]

I qoute:

"this is not a new thing for the British Police. And 8 bullets in the head is not a mistake. It is murder. They have carried out murder for years against the Catholics of Northern Ireland. Sometimes killing innocent persons. But that is war, right. They have done similar murders in London and in Gibralter. I would say to Blair " stop killing innocent People and stop the Occupation of Iraq. Pay for war reparations and appologize for real for your many transgessions."

Well Mr Poison, having lived in the UK for 30 years now, I think I can say with some knowledge that the UK police are not well known for 1. being armed and 2. Gunning people down needlessly.

8 bullits to the head is a tad excessive and yes, could be construed as murder. If it was a sub-machine gun, maybe he was lucky it was only 8. I wonder if anybody here really knows the full circumstances of that situation.

I don't think anybody is denying the fact that needless killing is wrong, but it appears that certain people around here think that the British government are the only ones with blood on there hands regarding mistake killings and war in general.

Perhaps you should ask, Canada, Bulgaria, Italy etc. etc. to "Pay for war reparations and appologize for real for your many transgessions" as well.

Its cleaver to use the recent balls up by the British police and the difficult position of the prime minister to go on an all out verbal bender against him - it's also very short sighted.

I have some military contacts that could tell you a thing or to about Brits being killed needlessly by the IRA etc. as well.

Try and see the big picture - no single nation is exempt from blame on any of this and listen to the media at your own peril.

Quote: Originally Posted by Frappuccino DibsI qoute:
"this is not a new thing for the British Police. And 8 bullets in the head is not a mistake. It is murder. They have carried out murder for years against the Catholics of Northern Ireland. Sometimes killing innocent persons. But that is war, right. They have done similar murders in London and in Gibralter. I would say to Blair " stop killing innocent People and stop the Occupation of Iraq. Pay for war reparations and appologize for real for your many transgessions."
Well Mr Poison, having lived in the UK for 30 years now, I think I can say with some knowledge that the UK police are not well known for 1. being armed and 2. Gunning people down needlessly.
8 bullits to the head is a tad excessive and yes, could be construed as murder. If it was a sub-machine gun, maybe he was lucky it was only 8. I wonder if anybody here really knows the full circumstances of that situation.
I don't think anybody is denying the fact that needless killing is wrong, but it appears that certain people around here think that the British government are the only ones with blood on there hands regarding mistake killings and war in general.

Quote has been trimmed

By the way, this list is obviously not complete as Canada also had troops in Iraq, I'm sure there are yet others as well.

The Canadians in Iraq were on an existing exchange program with the US military, Mr. Dibs. While I don't agree with allowing even that, it is far different than sending troops as a country.