"We will fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here"
Bush said that again yesterday, its a refrain we've heard for a few years.
No matter that there is no real basis for it, just a typical Bush idea that things are clear, cut and dried, because he said so because he is the President.
Really, who are they killing over there [Iraq]? Its civilians and imported fighters, an inexhaustable supply. One goes down, another pops up. Bush doesn't relate that fact to the American public, and lord knows they wouldn't think of it unless their president mentioned it.
No matter that when America invades a soveriegn nation like Iraq, it creates many MORE enraged citizens, ready to become terrorists. This concern HAS been mentioned in the American media a few times, but it has never been answered by the "one-track mind" of the Pres. Not addressing our concerns is one reason the public support is dwindling for Bush, but he knows he can stick it out for a few years , and besides, there is no re-election, no need to keep their support.
"killing them over there" has meant killing many innocents. There are many many more innocents killed in Iraq than Americas killed from terrorism, a totally unbalanced death count.
"too bad, life ain't fair" is the response behind the politic-talk. tic-talk. tic-talk. And it won't be America that "makes it fair" will it?
No, fairness is not a concern for these brats. Not this cabal of Elites chasing power and oil as if the human race were disposable pawns who should be killed if they don't help the cause of economic inequality that is the goal of the Elite's pseudo-capitalism.
not love, not peace, not harmony, not anything that people desire more than all else. Not even the freedom to realise that thats what they want! We have been trained to believe we want wealth,no matter that we have to spend it on gasoline at outrageous prices just because of supply and refining problems DUE TO THE RESISTANCE TO INCLUDE ALTERNATIVE FUELS AND EFFICIENCY, the two things that would bring the price and demand for gasoline.
I mention this because the invading of Iraq was partly [at least] for the oil, and despite large volumes flowing from Iraq now or in the future, the prices won't come down. Its a good way for the Elites to bag a few more billions though. American's will not get any benefits at all from invading Iraq. Not security, thats further away than it was a few years ago.... and not economic benefits, as "trickle down" becomes a mere drop on parched ground while the Elites [friends of Bush, etc.] bath in deep pools.
Support cannot last for "fighting them over there", but it won't matter. It will be very obvious that "fighting them over there" was a collossal act of evil and carnage [ with the full support of religious groups, oddly enough] , and that it won't mean we don't have to fight them over here, because we never did have to fight them over here.
Even 9-11 has those HUGE doubting questions hanging over it, starting with "why did building number 7 fall", but Bush refuses to even engage that disturbing fact in media, or with anyone. Why did the fly-boys stand down that day for the first time in years, why did they not find any Arab hijackers even in the downed plane in Philly?
These questions may seem radical, but they have endured and people want some answers for them, any plausable reasons would do.
Will they eventually put Bush on trial? Or wil he get comfy retirement like Nixon?
Bush said that again yesterday, its a refrain we've heard for a few years.
No matter that there is no real basis for it, just a typical Bush idea that things are clear, cut and dried, because he said so because he is the President.
Really, who are they killing over there [Iraq]? Its civilians and imported fighters, an inexhaustable supply. One goes down, another pops up. Bush doesn't relate that fact to the American public, and lord knows they wouldn't think of it unless their president mentioned it.
No matter that when America invades a soveriegn nation like Iraq, it creates many MORE enraged citizens, ready to become terrorists. This concern HAS been mentioned in the American media a few times, but it has never been answered by the "one-track mind" of the Pres. Not addressing our concerns is one reason the public support is dwindling for Bush, but he knows he can stick it out for a few years , and besides, there is no re-election, no need to keep their support.
"killing them over there" has meant killing many innocents. There are many many more innocents killed in Iraq than Americas killed from terrorism, a totally unbalanced death count.
"too bad, life ain't fair" is the response behind the politic-talk. tic-talk. tic-talk. And it won't be America that "makes it fair" will it?
No, fairness is not a concern for these brats. Not this cabal of Elites chasing power and oil as if the human race were disposable pawns who should be killed if they don't help the cause of economic inequality that is the goal of the Elite's pseudo-capitalism.
not love, not peace, not harmony, not anything that people desire more than all else. Not even the freedom to realise that thats what they want! We have been trained to believe we want wealth,no matter that we have to spend it on gasoline at outrageous prices just because of supply and refining problems DUE TO THE RESISTANCE TO INCLUDE ALTERNATIVE FUELS AND EFFICIENCY, the two things that would bring the price and demand for gasoline.
I mention this because the invading of Iraq was partly [at least] for the oil, and despite large volumes flowing from Iraq now or in the future, the prices won't come down. Its a good way for the Elites to bag a few more billions though. American's will not get any benefits at all from invading Iraq. Not security, thats further away than it was a few years ago.... and not economic benefits, as "trickle down" becomes a mere drop on parched ground while the Elites [friends of Bush, etc.] bath in deep pools.
Support cannot last for "fighting them over there", but it won't matter. It will be very obvious that "fighting them over there" was a collossal act of evil and carnage [ with the full support of religious groups, oddly enough] , and that it won't mean we don't have to fight them over here, because we never did have to fight them over here.
Even 9-11 has those HUGE doubting questions hanging over it, starting with "why did building number 7 fall", but Bush refuses to even engage that disturbing fact in media, or with anyone. Why did the fly-boys stand down that day for the first time in years, why did they not find any Arab hijackers even in the downed plane in Philly?
These questions may seem radical, but they have endured and people want some answers for them, any plausable reasons would do.
Will they eventually put Bush on trial? Or wil he get comfy retirement like Nixon?
