Here's what Farage's vision of Britain really looks like

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Ukip leader, MEP and Leave campaigner Nigel Farage sets out his vision for Britain:

Don't let David Cameron and George Osborne fool you: here's what my vision of Britain really looks like


Nigel Farage, Ukip leader and MEP for South East England
10 June 2016
The Telegraph



Isn’t it striking that even those who support EU membership rarely speak with any passion about why they believe that we should allow the majority of our laws to be made by the unelected European Commission? Rather than defending their support of the full EU army that is coming if we Remain, they seek to deny its very existence. The likes of David Cameron and Nick Clegg seem in complete denial about the reality of EU membership.

The Remainers’ latest attempt to divert attention from their own lack of belief in the EU is their talk of “Farage’s Britain”. We’ve heard it from both Mr Cameron and George Osborne. Clearly, they are reluctant to talk about why they don’t think Britain is good enough to thrive outside the EU and are instead seeking to define what my vision is for Britain.

I’m sorry, but I’m not going to allow that to happen. So here is my vision for the country that I love.

The principle of self-government is more important to me than anything else. So many fought and died to preserve our democracy. It is precious. Yet our birthright has been handed away by the political establishment. Central to my vision of Britain after June 23 is that our Parliament is sovereign, empowered and able to make all of the big decisions, rather than leaving it to those unelected old men in Brussels.

By leaving the EU, we would once again be a proper democracy. We would once again have the ability to govern our own country. For example, when it comes to migration policy, it would be up to our elected MPs to debate and decide just what level of migration our country needs.

My vision for our post-Brexit migration system is really quite simple: an Australian-style system that allows those we need to come with work permits, but which brings down numbers significantly to sensible levels. The post-war average rate of net migration was between 30,000 to 50,000 per year. That to me seems a sensible level, rather than the hundreds of thousands every year that we’ve seen under Mr Cameron’s premiership.

A new poll for The Independent released yesterday shows a massive lead for Leave with just 12 days to go to the referendum.
The survey of 2,000 people by ORB found that 55 per cent believe the UK should leave the EU (up four points since our last poll in April), while 45 per cent want it to remain (down four points). These figures are weighted to take account of people’s likelihood to vote. It is by far the biggest lead the Leave camp has enjoyed since ORB began polling the EU issue for The Independent a year ago, when it was Remain who enjoyed a 10-point lead. Now the tables have turned.

By taking back control of our borders, our country can gain all the benefits of migration while ensuring that never again do our own people have their living standards pushed down. The suffering for millions of ordinary, decent British folk caused by EU open-door immigration may be a price worth paying for Mr Cameron and his friends so that they can attend fancy summits with the overpaid EU elite, but the social and financial cost of uncontrolled migration to British workers will never be acceptable to me.

So it is part of my vision that after a Leave vote, by controlling our borders and stopping a flood of unskilled migrant labour into the country, wages would rise for British workers. The minimum wage would no longer be the maximum wage for so many of our citizens. Our younger generation would have a proper chance of getting their foot in the door, with employers encouraged to train them, rather than simply relying on cheap migrant workers.

Post-Brexit Britain would also mean our infrastructure was no longer bursting at the seams. By controlling numbers, we could plan ahead. Families could get their kids into the local school, ensure that they could see a GP far quicker and look realistically at getting on the housing ladder. The fact that we now, as a country, have to build a new house every four minutes – just to cope with demand caused by current levels of migration – is a scandal.



The vision for Brexit Britain is a global one. The way that we have treated many of our traditional allies in the world by locking ourselves into the inwards-looking EU is a disgrace. After leaving the EU we would be able to treat all who wanted to come here on an equal basis, strengthening our proud ties to our kith and kin in the Commonwealth. It is shameful that we have discriminated against those countries in favour of the EU. That would end. We would no longer be acting as Little Europeans, but a Global Britain.

Being represented on the world stage by EU bureaucrats who think that they know what’s best for us – that would end too. My vision is a Britain engaging in global trade, forging ahead with new relationships and deals that would make Britain an engine room for job creation, rather than being constrained by the EU’s outdated customs union.

So there you go: that’s my vision. A strong Britain, controlling our borders, looking after the well-being of our own citizens first and leading on the world stage, rather than being dragged along and told what to do by Angela Merkel and Jean-Claude Juncker. We are a great country and amazing possibilities await us outside of the EU.

The hopelessly pessimistic Remain side say we can’t do any better than we are at the moment. I am far, far more optimistic about this country and its future outside of the EU. Let’s make June 23 our Independence Day.


Don't let David Cameron and George Osborne fool you: here's what my vision of Britain really looks like
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
'By leaving the EU, we would once again be a proper democracy. We would once again have the ability to govern our own country. For example, when it comes to migration policy, it would be up to our elected MPs to debate and decide just what level of migration our country needs.'

The MP's can debate (at home where they were elected) with the voters and on voting day they will decide on what path the nation takes. Democracy is not giving away your vote to somebody (whom you also give money to) who will vote whichever way the largest briber wants him to vote.

Tell me you didn't forget that part about democracy.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113


'By leaving the EU, we would once again be a proper democracy. We would once again have the ability to govern our own country. For example, when it comes to migration policy, it would be up to our elected MPs to debate and decide just what level of migration our country needs.'

The MP's can debate (at home where they were elected) with the voters and on voting day they will decide on what path the nation takes. Democracy is not giving away your vote to somebody (whom you also give money to) who will vote whichever way the largest briber wants him to vote.

Tell me you didn't forget that part about democracy.

Britain can only be a proper democracy outside the EU, when we're not having the majority of our laws created by unlected foreigners in Brussels and Strasbourg.

Whilst walking through my neighbourhood this morning I saw in a house's front window a massive England flag and, next to it, a sign saying "VOTE LEAVE." So the residents of that house have got Euro 2016 and EU referendum fever.

Revenge of the betrayed: Abandoned by the metropolitan political elite, their lives utterly changed by mass migration, Labour's northern heartlands could swing it for Brexit

Mass migration could swing it for Brexit says worried northerner | Daily Mail Online



People in the North of England feel disenfranchised when it comes to their concerns over Europe being heard


Brexit campaigners Bill Palfreman and Amy Green hand out leaflets as they spread the word in Leeds





Bulgarian Leeds resident Nino is handed a Vote Leave leaflet (top) and Brexit-supporting UKIP MEP for North West England Steven Woolfe campaigns in Stockport



















 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Un-elected by the UK or un-elected by/in the host nation? I know you would like all people everywhere would just vote the way you (the UK) need them to but that is not the way things are going to work. You need a Queen who would be willing to abolish the monarchy as it is an outdated mode of governing and has been sine the invention of the telephone. Maybe next generation eh?

In a democracy the rest of the EU would also be voting on the same issue but from a slightly different angle, should the UK be exiled from the EU.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Un-elected by the UK or un-elected by/in the host nation? I know you would like all people everywhere would just vote the way you (the UK) need them to but that is not the way things are going to work. You need a Queen who would be willing to abolish the monarchy as it is an outdated mode of governing and has been sine the invention of the telephone. Maybe next generation eh?

In a democracy the rest of the EU would also be voting on the same issue but from a slightly different angle, should the UK be exiled from the EU.

A poll released about three days ago shows that most people in the UK don't want a referendum on whether or nor we should become a republic.

So that gives you some idea of just how unpopular the idea of a republic is in the UK.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Rather than a poll how about an actual referendum on that issue and then take that as 'the will of the people'. A poll can say anything you want it to as it doesn't have the telephone numbers of the ones who replied to the poll
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Prime Minister David Cameron has gone into full scaremongerry, the-end-of-the-world mode. He wants the voters to curl up in the fetal position in a total panic instead of voting to leave the EU.

Protections for state pensions, the NHS and defence spending cannot be guaranteed if Britain leaves the EU, David Cameron has warned.
The Prime Minister said the strain on the public finances caused by Brexit would threaten the end of the "triple lock" guarantee for OAP payments and the ring-fencing of health funding.
And Chancellor George Osborne said the armed forces could see their budgets slashed by £1-£1.5 billion a year as the wider economy shrank.​
Normally this is a good strategy. The public usually responds to fear rather than hope. The problem happens when the public stops believing you. What happens when the public stops being afraid?

Emergency battle plans are being drawn up to try to win over voters and save the Prime Minister’s career after a series of opinion polls put the Leave campaign ahead.
The plans will see David Cameron take a back seat in the campaign after polling showed he has lost the trust of voters on the referendum issue.
Instead Labour will be put in charge of winning over wavering voters
in the North of England.​
This is an amazing development for two reasons, but first let's look at the new Brexit polls.
The campaign to take Britain out of the EU has opened up a remarkable 10-point lead over the Remain camp, according to an exclusive poll for The Independent.


This poll was backed up by a YouGov poll today, showing support for leaving leading by a small margin.

Besides the fact that the public isn't cowering in fear like they are supposed to, it is amazing that the establishment is turning to Labour to save them. Because Labour means Jeremy Corbyn, a proud socialist.

Let's turn back the clock to September, when David Cameron had this to say about Jeremy Corbyn. Cameron even called Corbyn a 'terrorist sympathiser'.

And now they want Corbyn to save them from Cameron's failure. Hmmm.

However, the most significant change was in Corbyn's overall approval ratings versus Cameron.
David Cameron's approval rating has fallen below Jeremy Corbyn's for the first time, a new poll has revealed.
Just 34 per cent of voters said the Prime Minister was doing a good job, while 58 per cent felt he was not.
The 24 per cent difference is worse than the 22 point difference between the 30 per cent who approve of the job Mr Corbyn is doing and the 52 per cent who disapprove.​
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
It's certainly not looking good for the Remain camp - and it's certainly not good for them that their main man David Cameron is now more unpopular than anthrax. This is a guy who, a few months ago, was saying that he may campaign to get Britain out of the EU if he didn't get the EU reforms that he wanted and now he's saying that Britain leaving the EU would cause WWIII and famine. If he thinks such calamity would befall Britain and the world upon Brexit, then why did he say orginally that he may campaign for Brexit - and why did he even give us a referendum on the issue?