Russia starts air strikes on ISIS in Syria, tells U.S. to steer clear

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Russia starts air strikes in Syria, tells U.S. to steer clear

By Andrew Osborn and Phil Stewart

MOSCOW/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Russia launched air strikes against targets in Syria on Wednesday in the Kremlin's biggest intervention in the Middle East in decades, telling the U.S. air force to steer clear while its warplanes were in action.

Moscow's assertion that it had attacked Islamic State was immediately challenged by Washington and by rebel sources in Syria.

A U.S. official said Moscow gave Washington just an hour's notice of the strikes, which the Kremlin said were designed to help President Bashar al-Assad, its closest regional ally, push back Islamist militants.

Notice of the attack came from a Russian official in Baghdad who asked the U.S. air force to avoid Syrian airspace during the mission, U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said.

Russia and the United States offered conflicting accounts of which targets had been struck, underlining growing tensions between the two former Cold War foes over Moscow's decision to intervene.

U.S. officials said targets in the Homs area appeared to have been struck, but not areas held by Islamic State.

Areas of the province of Homs struck by the Russians are controlled by an array of rebel groups including several operating under the banner of the "Free Syrian Army", activists, locals and rebels said. None of the sources named Islamic State as one of the groups operating in the areas hit on Wednesday.

The Russian Defense Ministry said however that its attacks were directed at Islamic State military targets. It said it had hit IS weapons depots, ammunition, communications infrastructure, and fuel. Continued...

Russia starts air strikes in Syria, tells U.S. to steer clear | Top News | Reuters
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113


PIERS MORGAN: Thank God there’s a strong world leader willing to stand up for American interests in the Middle East - shame it’s not ObamaÂ* | Daily Mail Online
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
This will further embolden the butcher Hafez al Assad.

Expect more Syrian government genocides, now that the Russian military has his back.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
They are not bombing ISIS. They are bombing the Free Syrian Army.

Maybe, they'll get lucky and shoot down another airliner.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
They are not bombing ISIS. They are bombing the Free Syrian Army.

Maybe, they'll get lucky and shoot down another airliner.

Kerry was on the Late Show with Colbert and he made a good point about whether or not this will show if Russia actually intends to end the conflict or support Assad.

If these bombings eventually show too many innocents getting hit, or no progress on the situation, then Russia will look like they are simply backing Assad and that will be catastrophic for them.

One would assume Harper has used his backbone to criticize Putin on that point already.

Oh wait...


Oh I'm hearing he hasn't said anything yet...


That exchange with Trudeau during the Munk debate is looking pretty ironic now, isn't it?
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,639
7,099
113
Washington DC
Kerry was on the Late Show with Colbert and he made a good point about whether or not this will show if Russia actually intends to end the conflict or support Assad.
Lavrov has already said that the purpose is to support Assad. Maybe Kerry should appear on comedy shows less and pick up a newspaper.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Possibly.

Bombing can only do so much.
Airstrikes Are Just the Appetizer - Get Ready for a Massive Ground Invasion from Iran

It would be difficult to overstate the significance of what appears to be going on here. This is nothing short of a Middle Eastern coup, as Iran looks to displace Saudi Arabia as the regional power broker and as Russia looks to supplant the US as the superpower puppet master.
In short, the Pentagon’s contention that Russia and Iran have formed a Mid-East “nexus” isn’t akin to the Bush administration’s hollow, largely bogus attempt to demonize America’s foreign policy critics in the eyes of the public by identifying an “axis of evil.” Rather, the Pentagon’s assessment was an attempt to come to grips with a very real effort on the part of Moscow and Tehran to tip the scales in the Mid-East away from Riyadh and Washington.
Solidifying the Assad regime in Syria serves to shore up Hezbollah and presents Tehran with an opportunity to assert itself in the name of combatting terror. The latter point there is critical. The West has long contended that Iran is the world’s foremost state sponsor of terror, and the Pentagon has variously accused the Quds Force of orchestrating attacks on US soldiers in Iraq after cooperation between Washington and Tehran broke down in the wake of Bush’s “axis of evil” comment.
Indeed, Iran was accused of masterminding a plot to kill the Saudi ambassador at a Washington DC restaurant in 2011.
Now, the tables have turned. It is the US, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar who stand accused of sponsoring Sunni extremists and it is Iran, and specifically the Revolutionary Guard, that gets to play hero.

Russia Inflicts More Damage on ISIS in 1 Day than the US Did in 1 Year

http://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1&v=XcVrtQ4QOP4

Pat Buchanan: Russia is Right - US is Wrong - "Time for US to Get Off its High Horse"


Looks like the US lost Lebanon also.

Russia Will Arm Lebanon Against ISIS

US Corporate Media - "Neutered, Impotent, Obsolete" - Here's the Smoking Gun

US Kills 1.5 Million in 'War on Terror' - Then Lies About '30 Civilian Casualties' in Russian Airstrikes
The dust had hardly settled on Russian airstrikes on ISIS positions in Syria before Western media reports claimed that 'civilians' had been killed “including women and children”.
Leaving aside the dubious nature of these allegations - the first of which was made before Russian airstrikes had even begun, according to Putin - Western propaganda outlets and the politicians they serve are in no position to point the finger at Russia over any purported “collateral damage”.

Comparing recent BBC headlines with BBC headlines from 4 years ago when NATO obliterated several cities in Libya, you could be forgiven for thinking that BBC journalists and editors have only now realised that bombs kill people, in particular Russian bombs (the British, French and American variety only ever killing 'bad guys' with 'pin-point accuracy').
Four years ago, not a word, much less a headline, was carried by Western newspapers about the slaughter of the people of Sirte by NATO war planes. The information was available, they just failed to report it.
In a call from a satellite phone to Reuters' office in Tunis on Saturday 17th September 2011, Libyan politician Moussa Ibrahim said:
“NATO attacked the city of Sirte last night with more than 30 rockets directed at the city's main hotel and the Tamin building, which consists of more than 90 residential flats.
“The result is more than 354 dead and 89 still missing and almost 700 injured in one night.”
“In the last 17 days more than 2,000 residents of the city of Sirte were killed in NATO air strikes.”

But U.S., British and French slaughter of civilians in Libya pales into relative insignificance when compared to the overall death toll from the last 12 years of the U.S.-led 'war on terror'.

Take your pills.
You are the one crying all the time, perhaps that is your conscience talking to you instead.