Britain Apologizes for Mau Mau Atrocities

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
LONDON — Britain has apologized and agreed to pay compensation to thousands of veterans of the Mau Mau nationalist uprising in Kenya, which was brutally suppressed by the British colonial government in the 1950s. It could pave the way for further claims against Britain for its actions in its former colonies.

The uprising by Mau Mau nationalists in 1950s Kenya was brutally suppressed by the British colonial government.
The Kenya Human Rights Commission estimates that 90,000 Kenyans were killed or maimed and 160,000 detained. Torture and rape were common.

More than 50 years later, British Foreign Secretary William Hague has apologized and agreed to pay compensation.
“The agreement includes payment of a settlement sum in respect of 5,228 claimants, as well as a gross costs sum to the total value of 19.9 million pounds [US $30.8 million]. The government will also support the construction of a memorial in Nairobi to the victims of torture and ill treatment during the colonial era,” he said.

In Kenya, Mau Mau veterans and campaigners celebrated the apology but said the compensation was far from enough. General Gitu Wa Kahengeri is secretary of the Mau Mau Veterans.

“We were detained for 10 years. I was detained for seven years with my father, who raised me. So the issue of 300,000 shillings [US $3,500] is far from the amount that I should have been paid or my father or anyone else who was there during the fight,” he said.
The deal was reached after a court ruled last year that three elderly Mau Mau veterans who suffered castration, rape and beatings could sue the government.

The lawyer representing the Mau Mau, Martyn Day, said it’s been a history lesson for Britain.

“Post World War II, the mood of everybody was that the Germans and the Japanese did absolutely terrible things to people and we were a cut above. I think the first lesson is that in fact we have done just as bad things at times,” said Day.

Britain had tried for three years to block the legal action, arguing that responsibility passed to Kenya upon its independence in 1963, and that the claim was brought after the legal time limit. Both arguments were rejected in court.

Human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said the way the government fought the legal action was an insult.

“Even the colonial administrators of the time admitted that these abuses were happening. So I do not understand why in good conscience the British government held out and fought so long and hard to deny this compensation and apology,” he said.
Tatchell said thousands more people were abused under British colonial rule.

“I hope this agreement will now pave the way for an apology and compensation for the victims of British colonial repression in other territories such as Malaya, Aden and Cyprus. They were subjected to similar abuses and it’s time they got justice,” he said.
The British government says it does not believe the settlement with Mau Mau veterans sets a precedent for other victims of British colonial rule.

Britain Apologizes for Mau Mau Atrocities – Pays Compensation
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Britain should not have apologised and paid compensation to a bunch of butchers. I don't see why people's tax money should be given to these murderous scumbags.

What SHOULD have happened is for Britain to demand an apology and compensation from the Mau Mau. And Britain should also have demanded that the Mau Mau also comensate the thousands of families of all those thousands of Africans that the barbarous Mau Mau murdered and butchered. That is what should have happened, but unfortunately Britain, like every other country in the West, is today run by a bunch of soppy, apologetic, Left Wing self-haters.

The fact that little compensation is being paid to the victims of the Mau Mau terrorist butchers is one of the tragedies of our times, and it's time to see what can be done to get Mau Mau victims compensated and for surviving Mau Mau to apologise to the victims' families.

All proposed compensation from Britain to the Mau Mau butchers should also be cancelled immediately.

David Blair

David Blair became Chief Foreign Correspondent of the Daily Telegraph in November 2011. He previously worked for the paper as Diplomatic Editor, Africa Correspondent and Middle East Correspondent.






What about compensating victims of the Mau Mau?


By David Blair
The Telegraph
June 6th, 2013



Victims of the Mau Mau have not received justice


Britain has agreed to compensate people who were tortured by the security forces of colonial Kenya during the Mau Mau Emergency of the 1950s. No-one can seriously doubt that terrible things were done during this era, nor that redress is right and necessary.

Equally, no-one can deny the Mau Mau's responsiblity for awful atrocities. But what is being done to compensate their surviving victims? I understand there will be a memorial in Nairobi, but nothing else is happening. Leigh Day, the law firm which brought this case, made Herculean efforts on behalf of the victims of British torture. I understand they cannot simply elect to represent victims of the Mau Mau, nor seek them out as clients. Nonetheless, I hope they would be willing to work just as hard for this seemingly neglected group.


The Mau Mau: Savage terrorists

I've put this point to Leigh Day and their response is that the colonial government compensated victims of the Mau Mau during the Emergency era.

I've spoken to David Anderson, the professor of African politics at Warwick and an adviser to Leigh Day, about this compensation programme. He told me that African victims of the Mau Mau were given cash payments, but awards were generally lower than those given to white victims.

Suppose that original scheme had been extended to victims of British torture. Would Leigh Day still have acted for them in this case? Or would they have told their prospective clients "you received compensation 50 years ago and there's nothing more that can be done"? The question only needs to be posed for the answer to be obvious: of course they would have brought the case. Leigh Day would not have turned away people maimed by the British security forces by saying "it's all very sad, but you really will have to be content with whatever redress you received from the colonial government". I trust they wouldn't say that to any living victims of the Mau Mau.


A victim of Mau Mau thugs

There is a general problem here. If you are a Kenyan who was tortured by a man in British uniform, you will now be compensated. If you suffered the same or worse at the hands of a Mau Mau guerrilla, then not many people seem to be interested. What appears to matter is not so much the iniquity of the act, but the identity of the perpetrator. The impression is that there are two classes of victim. After all, has anyone even troubled to count the living survivors of Mau Mau torture or document their ordeals?

If this case shows anything, it must surely be that it is not too late. So let's hope that someone will take up the legal cudgels on behalf of the victims of the Mau Mau and lay the impression of double standards to rest.

NOTE: This blog was corrected on 21 June to reflect the fact that payments by the colonial-era Compensation Committee were made in cash, not cattle.

READERS' COMMENTS

gooder
06/07/2013 07:02 PM

Mau Mau were Racists- they should have celebrated the 'Diversity' White immigrants brought, The Mau mau were lazy, they didn't want to do the jobs that white British immigrants did like Farming for eg. The British 'enriched' Kenyan culture too, with writing, modern medicine- Penicillin, anaesthetics & surgery, electricity, trains . roads, cars...


***************************************

remindmelater
06/08/2013 08:44 AM

Enough nonsense.
See here what the Mau Mau were really all about.
http://www.candour.org.uk/#/9-...


*************************************

Toby Esterházy
06/10/2013 06:40 AM

All the more reasons to ABOLISH legal aid. No legal aid, Leigh Day & Co., Matrix Chambers et al. go out of business, and everyone except the barristers is happy.


**********************************

stoffel45
06/14/2013 11:36 AM

Mau Mau - one of the foulest terrorist groups ever.
Yes - before a single penny (which should be the maximum payment) is paid, let us have the tally for the damage to these filthy savages' victims.
*******************************
remindmelater
06/07/2013 06:41 PM

When will the Ancient Britons be able to claim compensation from the Romans?
Same nonsense.
African teenagers affected by the Mau Mau troubles in Kenya during the 50's would be in their 80's now.
What about the families of the 2,000+ pro British Kenyans butchered by the Mau Mau?
When will the Kikuyu pay compensation for the murders they carried out on their own Countrymen?



************************

rosedale
06/07/2013 06:09 PM

What a joke.
Frankly I don't care how many Kenyan terrorists were rounded up and given a good kicking sixty-odd years ago.


**************************

Q46
06/07/2013 12:29 PM

How far back in history can we go... and why just the British?
An apology from the French for that disgraceful rampage throughout Northumbria by William after his coronation in 1066?
And what about some compensation from the Italian Government for the brutality of Roman colonisation?
The Franks and the English slaves they traded.
Then there is the murder and mayhem by the Irish in Scotland, North West England and the Cornish peninsula... and the slaves they took back to dear owald Oirland.
And don't get me started on the Vikings, Harald Hardrada and Norway.
*****************************

binliedto
06/08/2013 06:43 AM

How about compensating all native Briton's forced out of their towns and cities by this endless stream of third world 'multiculture.'
Rhode Island Woman Screams “Dumb White Girl” and Sics Her Pitbulls on News Reporter, Gateway Pundit
138 Comments
White reporter ventured into the wrong neighbourhood.
White Flight: Diversity Extremes Push Londoners’ Exodus, Russia Today
Horror at the School Homecoming Dance: Girl, 16, ‘Gang-Raped by up to Twenty Men and Left for Dead’ in Brutal Attack, Daily Mail (London)
179 Comments
Police found her “incoherent and barely conscious.”
The Parochialism of ‘Diversity’, Wall Street Journal
39 Comments
Liberals have their own “out-groups,” but foreigners aren’t among them.
‘Whites Need Not Apply’ at D.C. Labor Board?, Washington Examiner
66 Comments
Black board member was told to “refrain from hiring white men.”
Violent Crime in U.S. Rises for First Time Since 2006, New York Times
65 Comments
The crime increase is concentrated in big cities.
******************************

marplot
06/06/2013 12:23 PM

How about compensating the English for Scottish profligacy in crimes against England between 1997 and 2010?
******************************

bernardthebolt
06/06/2013 12:22 PM

Good article, it came to my mind who is going to settle money on the living relatives of our white friends who suffered being chopped into pieces by the criminal gangs of savage africans.
Black men good, white men bad.
Just like the animal farm fable.
***********************************

Jack Smith
06/07/2013 01:18 AM

"...don't go where you're not welcome and then whine about the consequences."
There are many millions of 3rd world immigrants who've imposed themselves on Britain since 1948 who would do well to listen to this advice.

*********************************

sarahoo
06/06/2013 12:16 PM

How far back shall we go ?
How about the UK suing Germany for war damage ?
*********************************

imarcher
06/06/2013 05:44 PM

The article is arguing for compensation for the victims of Mau Mau torture. The Mau Mau were the ones doing the oppressing.
***********************************

sodit
06/06/2013 12:47 PM

"If you suffered the same or worse at the hands of a Mau Mau guerrilla, then not many people seem to be interested"...
... of course no one is interested. Liberal opinion doesn't care about suffering. Liberal opinion cares about racialism.
Liberal opinion believes that it is wrong for a white skinned person to abuse a black skinned person, but there is nothing in paritcular wrong with black skinned people doing anything at all to other black skinned people...
... after all, as Liberal opinion has it, what else could one expect from people like that?
***********************************

bundamba
06/06/2013 02:19 PM

They also believe that there is nothing wrong with black skinned persons hacking white skinned persons to death.
**************************

zentail
06/06/2013 12:36 PM

Well done sir, someone had to say it. An uncle of mine, now in his 80's was in Kenya fighting the Mau Mau terrorists.
Some of the stories he told me of the attacks on White settlers, including some Charles Manson type murders of pregnant women, would chill your blood. Many of those responsible were never brought to justice.
That our government is paying out is despicable. Not least the lawyers fees. These greedy lowlifes should be ashamed of themselves.
**********************

eviltory
06/06/2013 12:30 PM

"Equally, no one can deny the Mau Mau's responsibility for awful
atrocities. But what is being done to compensate their surviving
victims?"
Nothing, because only whites can be racist or evil. Surely you understand that?
 
Last edited: