UK Parliament votes in favour of same-sex marriage


Corduroy
+3
#1
Gay marriage: Legislation passes first Commons hurdle



MPs have voted overwhelmingly in favour of the government's legislation for same-sex marriage in England and Wales.
At the conclusion of the Commons' first opportunity to debate the The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, MPs voted by 400 to 175, a majority of 225, in favour of the legislation.
Prime Minister David Cameron has described the move as "an important step forward" that strengthens society.
But a number of Conservative MPs voted against the plans.
MPs' decision to back the bill at second reading signifies that they approve with it in principle. The legislation will now proceed to receive more detailed parliamentary scrutiny.



BBC News - Gay marriage: Legislation passes Commons despite Tory opposition




What now homophobes?


Queen - 39Another One Bites the Dust39 - YouTube

 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+4
#2  Top Rated Post
About freaking time.
 
petros
+1
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

About freaking time.

What did you expect? It's the UK.
 
WLDB
No Party Affiliation
#4
Good.
 
Sal
No Party Affiliation
#5
Right on. Good stuff!
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#6
Seems ok to me, too. Not that I have any say in it anyway.
 
Spade
Free Thinker
#7
Could Britain have two kings or two queens at the same time? And, which one would be "Defender of the Faith."
 
WLDB
No Party Affiliation
+1
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Could Britain have two kings or two queens at the same time? And, which one would be "Defender of the Faith."

Should that ever happen it'd lead to an end to the monarchy, which I wouldnt mind. Go for it, Royals.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#9
And what if one is a queen and the other is a crossdresser?
 
Corduroy
+2
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by WLDBView Post

Should that ever happen it'd lead to an end to the monarchy, which I wouldnt mind. Go for it, Royals.

It would be a shame to get rid of the monarchy for that reason. It should because the institution is useless and undemocratic.
 
darkbeaver
Republican
#11
Same sex marriage is an unproductive story.
 
damngrumpy
No Party Affiliation
#12
To start with I want to see the monarchy remain for a bit yet. Not because I think it is
useful but because our family is descended from the Stewart's and we want the throne
back. Right now the Monarchy is not British at all, they are Tudor's from the German
line of the family.
As for the passing of the legislation, the obstructionists or social conservatives will be
crying in their tea this morning the rest of the world will see it as the world moving on
from another outdated argument. The old ways are slowly vanishing, those outdated
but persistent arguments over same sex marriage, abortion and other nonsense are being
dealt with. Some of these people think they can wrestle with and hod back the hands of
time itself but in the end the world moves on. long way to go though, especially south
of the boarder they are in the primitive stage of accepting Medicare something the over
all civilized world has had more a couple of generations now.
Parliament has decided representing all the citizens is possible for a change good for them.
 
Blackleaf
#13
Thankfully there is little chance that this bill will get through the House of Lords. There are Church of England clergy and many Tory MPs and other MPs in the Lords who will destroy it.

Polls show that most British people are against gay marriage. The Lords will show they are on the side of the majority of the people.

Quote: Originally Posted by damngrumpyView Post

To start with I want to see the monarchy remain for a bit yet. Not because I think it is
useful but because our family is descended from the Stewart's and we want the throne
back

I think you Stewarts ruined your chances of remaining as monarchs when you kept trying to rule absolutely and as Catholics.

Quote:


Right now the Monarchy is not British at all, they are Tudor's from the
German
line of the family.

The Tudors are British (Welsh, to be more precise), not German.
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Thankfully there is little chance that this bill will get through the House of Lords. There are Church of England clergy and many Tory MPs and other MPs in the Lords who will destroy it.

Polls show that most British people are against gay marriage. The Lords will show they are on the side of the majority of the people.



I think you Stewarts ruined your chances of remaining as monarchs when you kept trying to rule absolutely and as Catholics.



The Tudors are British (Welsh, to be more precise), not German.

Most british are repressed sexually anyway. Homophobic as well if you are to be believed.
 
Blackleaf
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Most british are repressed sexually anyway. Homophobic as well if you are to be believed.

Even most gay people don't want gay marriage. Surveys shows they are happy with civil marriages. They are happy with the way things are right now.

It has been calculated that only a tiny fraction of gay people - who themselves make up only a tiny fraction of the British population - would get married should homosexual marriage be legalised. In fact, the government is bizarrely rushing through gay legislation for the sake of just 0.02% of the British people.

The British people as a whole, straight and gay, do not see gay marriage as a government priority and are wondering why the government is rushing through with a bill for something which will affect hardly anybody when there are more pressing issues at hand which affect almost everybody like the economy, immigration and Europe.

Marriage should be between a man and a woman only and it is unlikely this bill will get through the Lords. Gay marriage isn't going to happen in Britain.
 
Walter
+1
#16
Most civilizations fall apart because of moral decay.
 
gerryh
+3
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

Most civilizations fall apart because of moral decay.


Really? I'm assuming, which when it comes to you can be dangerous, that you are implying that SSM is a sign of "moral decay". Just wanted to point out something in case you had blocked the memory. Canada allows and recognizes SSM and has for almost 10 years. As a Country, we don't seem to be doing that badly.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+3
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

Most civilizations fall apart because of moral decay.

Moral decay is a sign that the empire is falling apart. Corruption in all levels of government and business would qualify as moral decay more than gay marriage.
 
darkbeaver
Republican
+1
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Moral decay is a sign that the empire is falling apart. Corruption in all levels of government and business would qualify as moral decay more than gay marriage.

What seems the very epitome of fairness and equality for minorities very often leads to clefts and fissures wherein wedges may be driven to split the pillars of any institution, nation or Empire. Nothing is sacred to destroyers and parasites.
 
FiveParadox
Liberal
+2
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Thankfully there is little chance that this bill will get through the House of Lords. There are Church of England clergy and many Tory MPs and other MPs in the Lords who will destroy it.

You're funny.

There are only twenty-six Lords Spiritual in the House of Lords, out of over seven hundred members. While these bishops are certainly respected and will be heard, their votes -- even combined with the votes of Conservative peers -- are nowhere near the numbers that would be required to suspend the legislation. Moreover, in any case, the House of Lords has only a suspensive veto over this bill. If the Lords reject the bill, then the Commons may force the issue again in the next session and pass the bill again; and upon this second passage, the Parliament Act, 1911, sets out that the bill may be presented to Her Majesty the Queen without the consent of the House of Lords.

Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Polls show that most British people are against gay marriage. The Lords will show they are on the side of the majority of the people.

Actually, polls have shown that support for same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom has only grown over the past year or so (see here). Also, not to nit-pick, but the term "gay marriage" is biased and really ought to not be used; it only reinforces the idea that your opposition to same-sex marriage is based on your discomfort with the idea of male-male sexual activity in the context of your own sexual preferences, rather than the concept of marriage equality.
 
CDNBear
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadoxView Post

You're funny.

You're generous and forgiving.
 
Walter
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Moral decay is a sign that the empire is falling apart. Corruption in all levels of government and business would qualify as moral decay more than gay marriage.

All of the above are symptoms.
 
Blackleaf
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadoxView Post

You're funny.

There are only twenty-six Lords Spiritual in the House of Lords, out of over seven hundred members. While these bishops are certainly respected and will be heard, their votes -- even combined with the votes of Conservative peers -- are nowhere near the numbers that would be required to suspend the legislation. Moreover, in any case, the House of Lords has only a suspensive veto over this bill. If the Lords reject the bill, then the Commons may force the issue again in the next session and pass the bill again; and upon this second passage, the Parliament Act, 1911, sets out that the bill may be presented to Her Majesty the Queen without the consent of the House of Lords.

The Queen won't give consent for a gay marriage bill. Not when she's the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and not when her people don't want it. There have been mass protests in France against gay marriage and there will be here should there be any chance of this awful bill becoming law.


Quote:

Actually, polls have shown that support for same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom has only grown over the past year or so (see here).

Polls show that most people in Britain are against gay marriage. A recent poll by ComRes has shown that seven out of 10 British people believe that marriage should continue to be defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman, and more than eight out 10 think children have the best chance in life when raised by their biological parents, the ComRes online survey of more than 2,000 people found. The poll also found that people think the state should promote heterosexual marriage.

70% against redefining marriage, poll shows | Catholic Voices

Quote:

Also, not to nit-pick, but the term "gay marriage" is biased

Of course it's biased. We're talking about marriage between gay people, not marriage between normal people.

Quote:

and really ought to not be used;

It has to be used, We're not talking about legalising marriage in Britain. We're talking about legalising gay marriage.

Quote:

it only reinforces the idea that your opposition to same-sex marriage is based on your discomfort with the idea of male-male sexual activity in the context of your own sexual preferences, rather than the concept of marriage equality.

I do feel discomfort at the idea of gay marriage. Marriage should be between a man and a woman only.
 
CDNBear
+2
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

I do feel discomfort at the idea of gay marriage. Marriage should be between a man and a woman only.

Why?

Quote:

Of course it's biased. We're talking about marriage between gay people, not marriage between normal people.

Wow, lol.
 
Sal
No Party Affiliation
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Polls show that most people in Britain are against gay marriage. A recent poll by ComRes has shown that seven out of 10 British people believe that marriage should continue to be defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman, and more than eight out 10 think children have the best chance in life when raised by their biological parents, the ComRes online survey of more than 2,000 people found.

Blackleaf, first let me say. I respect your right to feel uncomfortable with gay marriage. The problem with polls is that they merely reflect people's opinion and have nothing to do with facts. Children actually have the best chance in life when they are raised in a balanced, loving home. It has in fact nothing to do with the biology of their parents since dysfunction can occur in either sex.

There are many children raised in abuse and suffer daily at the hands of their biological parents.
Quote:

Of course it's biased. We're talking about marriage between gay people, not marriage between normal people.

Gay is a sexual orientation and does not affect whether or not someone is normal from a psychological perspective.


Quote:

I do feel discomfort at the idea of gay marriage. Marriage should be between a man and a woman only.

Understandable. Most people feel discomfort when faced with that with which they are unfamiliar. If you were to speak with gay couples, get to know them as human beings and understand their feelings, you might be surprised at how your views would begin to shift. It's where many of us had to begin.
 
WLDB
No Party Affiliation
+1
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

The Queen won't give consent for a gay marriage bill. Not when she's the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and not when her people don't want it.

The head of the church which was invented to redefine marriage doesnt want to redefine marriage? How strange. Its amazing that the church even exists anymore considering how it was formed.

Also, when was the last time the Queen (or any monarch for that matter) has refused to sign a bill presented to her? I imagine that'd be pretty big news and cause a backlash against the monarchy in general. She didnt seem to concerned when her representative here signed it into law.
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
+3
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

The Queen won't give consent for a gay marriage bill. Not when she's the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and not when her people don't want it. There have been mass protests in France against gay marriage and there will be here should there be any chance of this awful bill becoming law.




Polls show that most people in Britain are against gay marriage. A recent poll by ComRes has shown that seven out of 10 British people believe that marriage should continue to be defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman, and more than eight out 10 think children have the best chance in life when raised by their biological parents, the ComRes online survey of more than 2,000 people found. The poll also found that people think the state should promote heterosexual marriage.

70% against redefining marriage, poll shows | Catholic Voices



Of course it's biased. We're talking about marriage between gay people, not marriage between normal people.



It has to be used, We're not talking about legalising marriage in Britain. We're talking about legalising gay marriage.



I do feel discomfort at the idea of gay marriage. Marriage should be between a man and a woman only.

Since when are gays not normal people?
 
coldstream
#28
It's another nail in the coffin of Western Civilization.. a form of mass insanity (unable to tell the difference between good and evil)..unstoppable now it seems.. a highway to hell. A new Dark Age looms.
 
gerryh
+1
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by coldstreamView Post

It's another nail in the coffin of Western Civilization.. a form of mass insanity (unable to tell the difference between good and evil)..unstoppable now it seems.. a highway to hell. A new Dark Age looms.


roflmfao... ya....ok.....
 
FiveParadox
Liberal
+4
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

The Queen won't give consent for a gay marriage bill. Not when she's the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and not when her people don't want it. There have been mass protests in France against gay marriage and there will be here should there be any chance of this awful bill becoming law.

Her Majesty the Queen of Canada chose not to exercise her authority to veto the decision of The Right Honourable Madame Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin P.C., the Chief Justice of Canada, when she signified royal assent to our own Civil Marriage Act (in her capacity, at the time, as the Administrator of Her Majesty's Government for Canada). I somehow doubt that Her Majesty would elect to become quite so activist in a matter such as this. The bill before your Parliament now only seeks to bring the United Kingdom back up to where it should be -- as an example to the rest of the Commonwealth of Nations as to what proper respect for rights and freedoms is supposed to look like.

Also, Her Majesty would have no reason to stand in the way of this bill, even in Her Majesty's capacity as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. The Marriage Act, 1949, as amended by the proposed Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, would include under clause 26A(5) an express exclusion for the Church of England. It is expressly declared, in that clause, that nothing in the religious marriage opt-in section "is to be taken to relate or have any reference to marriages solemnized according to the rites of the Church of England." (Source)

Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Polls show that most people in Britain are against gay marriage. A recent poll by ComRes has shown that seven out of 10 British people believe that marriage should continue to be defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman, and more than eight out 10 think children have the best chance in life when raised by their biological parents, the ComRes online survey of more than 2,000 people found. The poll also found that people think the state should promote heterosexual marriage.

Again -- no, they don't.

The poll and research that you have cited are out-of-date. This online survey was conducted on February 23-24, 2012, and was "commissioned by Catholic Voices." This took place before Her Majesy's Government had even started its consultations on the matter. After more than eleven months, and a fulsome public discussion on the matter, it is clearly apparent that the public opinion on the matter has shifted. (See here; I thought it might be good to throw in some research that was not "commissioned by Catholic Voices" -- i.e., ComRes.)

Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

Of course it's biased. We're talking about marriage between gay people, not marriage between normal people.

I think it would be better if I ignored this comment, lest a moderator see fit to have me hanged.

Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

It has to be used, We're not talking about legalising marriage in Britain. We're talking about legalising gay marriage.

The United Kingdom is not talking about legalising "gay marriage," you're discussing whether to legalise "same-sex marriage." The term "gay marriage" is abused by conservatives to stir up discomfort with the idea of male-male sexual activity; the idea of lesbian or bisexual women marrying is minimised in the conservative debate so as to ensure the most dramatic possible argument against. This speaks to a whole range of social biases that modern people really should be pushing to move past at this point.
 

Similar Threads

0
Could you all do me a favour, please?
by Machjo | Feb 27th, 2006
10
polygamist Marriage and gay marriage
by jimfeng5 | Feb 6th, 2006
53
no new posts