HuffPo Writer Compares Pro-Israel Supporters To People Who Supported The Holocaust…


Locutus
#1
Unreal: HuffPo Writer Compares Pro-Israel Supporters To People Who Supported The Holocaust…

MJ Rosenberg, whose hatred for Israel is so over the top Soros-funded Media Matters had to force him out, is at it again. He now writes for the Huffington Post.

Those who support Israel’s action in Gaza deserve 2 have their photos posted in section of Holocaust museum called: the world stood silent.
— Michael J Rosenberg (@MJayRosenberg) November 15, 2012

Unreal: HuffPo Writer Compares Pro-Israel Supporters To People Who Supported The Holocaust… | Weasel Zippers
 
petros
+3
#2  Top Rated Post
He's right.

Amen.
 
darkbeaver
Republican
+1
#3
He's correct not right. The articles suggested seem to indicate that he leans left. As if that mattered anymore. amen Isn't thee holocaust thee benchmark in human on human brutality? How can this demented fool dare to suggest that Israel could possible eclipse this enshrined dishonour? It's plain to see the mass murder inflicted on Gaza is simply not of the same scale and the I don't think the Nazis used phosphorous and it seems far fewer people are starving to death so the records safe I think.
Last edited by darkbeaver; Nov 16th, 2012 at 01:05 PM..
 
earth_as_one
#4
The best way to judge Zionist MJ Rosenberg is to read his words.
MJ Rosenberg: Abandoning "Israel Firster" to Fight a Battle to Win

Some recent tweets:

MJayRosenberg: The West Bank is occupied. Gaza is blockaded. 100% of historic Palestine is controlled by Israel. And Hamas is the aggressor?

MJayRosenberg: One day Israel's treatment of Palestinians will have a place in the Holocaust museum.

MJ Rosenberg
 
darkbeaver
Republican
#5
He sells poison apples.
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
#6
...the snake!
 
petros
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

The best way to judge Zionist MJ Rosenberg is to read his words.
MJ Rosenberg: Abandoning "Israel Firster" to Fight a Battle to Win

Some recent tweets:

MJayRosenberg: The West Bank is occupied. Gaza is blockaded. 100% of historic Palestine is controlled by Israel. And Hamas is the aggressor?

MJayRosenberg: One day Israel's treatment of Palestinians will have a place in the Holocaust museum.

MJ Rosenberg

Too much Starbucks or MJ, MJ?
 
earth_as_one
#8
Rosenberg has his viewpoint.

I don't have a problem with Zionism itself. My problem is with the violent ethnic cleansing, religious based discrimination, violations of human rights.... associated with Zionism.

The original version of Zionism, was non-violent and voluntary. If it had remained that way, I could support it. I might even have donated money to the cause. But Zionism in its current form is a crime against humanity and everyone should oppose it for the same reasons why people should have opposed the Nazis. I'm not saying Zionism is as harsh as the Nazism, but its not a big leap to go from ethnic cleansing to genocide. The Nazis only practiced ethnic cleansing initially too, until about 1941 when it escalated to genocide. Zionism today is where Nazism was in the mid 30's. Its possible that Zionists could eventually resort to genocide. This conflict isn't over yet...
 
gore0bsessed
-1
#9
What the hell is voluntary Zionism?
 
earth_as_one
#10
Early Zionism was just about buying real estate. There was no violence. People sold their land to Zionists voluntarily, often well above market price... for the inconvenience of moving elsewhere.

I have no problems with this version of Zionism.
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#11
MJ Rosenberg is an idiot.
 
CDNBear
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

My problem is with the violent ethnic cleansing, religious based discrimination, violations of human rights....

But you defend Hamas.
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
+1
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

rosenberg has his viewpoint.

I don't have a problem with zionism itself. My problem is with the violent ethnic cleansing, religious based discrimination, violations of human rights.... Associated with islam.

The original version of islam, was non-violent and voluntary. If it had remained that way, i could support it. I might even have donated money to the cause. But islam in its current form is a crime against humanity and everyone should oppose it for the same reasons why people should have opposed the nazis. I'm not saying islamis as harsh as the nazism, but its not a big leap to go from ethnic cleansing to genocide. The nazis only practiced ethnic cleansing initially too, until about 1941 when it escalated to genocide. Islam today is where nazism was in the mid 30's. Its possible that islamcould eventually resort to genocide. This conflict isn't over yet...

fify
 
tay
#14
Give both sides nukes with 100 mile limited range and let them go at it..............
 
damngrumpy
No Party Affiliation
#15
One person murdered using the same techniques is as serious as six million if one believes
in human rights and the true meaning of justice. The problem is as humans we don't always
equate the same level of justice as its applied or we want to apply it to one group or the other.
In the Middle East we have two groups or more all with the intent of killing each other almost
for sport. The Israeli military is out killing Arabs, Arabs are out plotting against Israelis and in
some cases other Arabs. There are hate groups on both sides and in other areas there are
friends on both sides of the conflict.
I would suggest that both sides should be held accountable. one for massive overreaction and
the Arabs for firing missiles into Israel killing women and children. Even worse we as the
outside world should be condemned for selling arms to both sides for defence of course but the
defence is the offence against their neighbours.
The world is complicit in this and if we truly wanted to make a difference the world could by using
its power for purposes other than continuing this conflict because its profitable to do so.
 
eh1eh
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

fify

If you're going to do that put your changes in bold or another colour so that people know what you changed. Changing someone's post in a quote is not acceptable.
 
no new posts