Are these actions war crimes?


earth_as_one
Avatar
#1
1) Deliberately firing missiles and mortars at civilians.
2) Not allowing a prisoner to be seen by the Red Cross
3) Suicide bombers against civilian targets....
4) Use of civilians including women and children as human shields to defend artillery and tank positions
5) Use of civilians including women and children as human shields to block bullets and set off booby traps.
6) Use of civilians including children to search for explosives
7) Use of civilians including children to search for enemy positions and draw enemy fire
8 )Deliberately destroying civilian infrastructure for purely collective punishment reasons without any military purpose:
- hospitals, schools and universities, police and fire stations, mosques and churches, government buildings
- sewage and water distribution systems
- sewage and water treatment systems
- food production, storage and distribution
- electricity production and distribution
- fuel storage and distribution
9) Deliberately attacking ambulance drivers, paramedics, firemen and police and innocent civilians. including women and children.
10) Ethnic cleansing
11) Interference with the delivery of international medical and food aid, causing death from easily treatable diseases and food insecurity
12) Deliberately attacking UN and NGO aid convoys.

It should make any difference who does these things for them to be a war crimes or not. These actions either are or aren't war crimes regardless of who does them.

You can find examples of these actions here:

1) --

2) --

3) --

4) --

5) --

6) --

7)--

8 ) --

9) --

10) --

11) --

12) --

Are any of these activities war crimes or crimes against humanity?
 
Goober
Free Thinker
Avatar
+3
#2  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

1) ?

OH WOW. Another Anti Israel Thread. You are an affront to critical and impartial thought.
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#3
Actually this is an anti-war crime thread. Notice the list of possible war crimes and crimes against humanity don't accuse anyone of anything.

This thread is in response to efforts by you and others to hijack another thread. Since you can't stay on topic on that other thread, I started this one... where your posts and post by others will be on topic.

You are welcome BTW.
 
DaSleeper
Avatar
+2
#4


EAO....No matter how you dress up a pig...it still smells like a pig!!!
 
CDNBear
Avatar
+1
#5


Anybody care to start a pool on how many posts it takes before this turns into one of EAO's usual demonize Israel threads?
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#6
Anyone care to start a pole on how many posts it takes before a troll tries to turn this thread into a personal attack against eao? I predict 5.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
Avatar
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post



Anybody care to start a pole on how many posts it takes before this turns into one of EAO's usual demonize Israel threads?

Not sure a pole would help. Perhaps a poll?

But the answer is 1. The OP has a whole bunch of articles which seem to be singular focused. Had EAO not provided the answers, it would have been a generic thread at least for a couple more posts.
 
CDNBear
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

Anyone care to start a pole on how many posts it takes before someone tries to turn this thread into a personal attack against eao? I predict 5.

You don't understand how this works do you?
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#9
C'mon oleo... here is your chance to discuss this issue and be on topic at the same time.
 
CDNBear
Avatar
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

Not sure a pole would help. Perhaps a poll?

Actually, it was supposed to say pool.

Quote:

But the answer is 1. The OP has a whole bunch of articles which seem to be singular focused. Had EAO not provided the answers, it would have been a generic thread at least for a couple more posts.

I was trying to be generous.

Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

C'mon oleo... here is your chance to discuss this issue and be on topic at the same time.

oleo, is the only one between the two of you, that actually discusses.

maybe you should pay attention to how it's done.
 
earth_as_one
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

.... Had EAO not provided the answers, it would have been a generic thread at least for a couple more posts.

Those were examples, not answers. Feel free to give your own examples.
 
CDNBear
+2
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

Those were examples, not answers. Feel free to give your own examples.

Here's an excellent example of a crime against humanity...

--
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

Actually this is an anti-war crime thread. Notice the list of possible war crimes and crimes against humanity don't accuse anyone of anything.

This thread is in response to efforts by you and others to hijack another thread. Since you can't stay on topic on that other thread, I started this one... where your posts and post by others will be on topic.

You are welcome BTW.

Really - The links are mainly anti Israel are they not?
 
TenPenny
Avatar
+2
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

Anyone care to start a pole on how many posts it takes before a troll tries to turn this thread into a personal attack against eao? I predict 5.

Nobody will turn this thread into a personal attack against eao, but there is some evidence that many will think it's further proof that he's a complete moron who can't post anything without turning it into an anti-Israel thread.
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
Avatar
#15
It must be a sad life to obsess so constantly on the ugliness in life. Just think where you might be if you'd just turn off the TV
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Really - The links are mainly anti Israel are they not?

How would you interpret this first example?

Some 20 rockets and mortar shells were fired from Gaza into southern Israel on Saturday, killing one man and wounding four others.

The rocket barrage followed an IDF strike on the Gaza Strip which resulted in the deaths of five Islamic Jihad militants.

Rockets were fired from Gaza into Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gan Yavne, and around Be'er Sheva. One man was seriously wounded in Ashkelon and eventually died of his wounds. Another man was moderately wounded in the Ashdod rocket strike and three others were lightly hurt. Moreover, 17 trauma victims were reported.

As a result of the escalation, classes were canceled in Ashdod, Ashkelon and other towns in the 40-kilometer range from Gaza. Ben Gurion University in Be'er Sheva also called off classes, which were due to begin on Sunday.

--
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

How would you interpret this first example?]

12 Links - How many are Anti Israel. You tell me?
 
CDNBear
+1
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

12 Links - How many are Anti Israel. You tell me?

None. Because he's a non violent pacifist.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
Avatar
+2
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

None. Because he's a non violent pacifist.

Regarding the Pool and the Pole discussion I can think of at least one scenario where both would be useful.
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#20
Feel free to cite your own examples regarding the above list.

But does it really matter who does these things before you can decide if an act is or isn't a war crime? You would have to subscribe to Orwell's theory of Moral Relativity to believe otherwise:

Orwell: All nationalists have the power of not seeing resemblances between similar sets of facts. A British Tory will defend self-determination in Europe and oppose it in India with no feeling of inconsistency. Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage — torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians — which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘our’ side. The Liberal News Chronicle published, as an example of shocking barbarity, photographs of Russians hanged by the Germans, and then a year or two later published with warm approval almost exactly similar photographs of Germans hanged by the Russians--. It is the same with historical events. History is thought of largely in nationalist terms, and such things as the Inquisition, the tortures of the Star Chamber, the exploits of the English buccaneers (Sir Francis Drake, for instance, who was given to sinking Spanish prisoners alive), the Reign of Terror, the heroes of the Mutiny blowing hundreds of Indians from the guns, or Cromwell's soldiers slashing Irishwomen's faces with razors, become morally neutral or even meritorious when it is felt that they were done in the ‘right’ cause. If one looks back over the past quarter of a century, one finds that there was hardly a single year when atrocity stories were not being reported from some part of the world; and yet in not one single case were these atrocities — in Spain, Russia, China, Hungary, Mexico, Amritsar, Smyrna — believed in and disapproved of by the English intelligentsia as a whole. Whether such deeds were reprehensible, or even whether they happened, was always decided according to political predilection.
The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them. For quite six years the English admirers of Hitler contrived not to learn of the existence of Dachau and Buchenwald. And those who are loudest in denouncing the German concentration camps are often quite unaware, or only very dimly aware, that there are also concentration camps in Russia. Huge events like the Ukraine famine of 1933, involving the deaths of millions of people, have actually escaped the attention of the majority of English russophiles. Many English people have heard almost nothing about the extermination of German and Polish Jews during the present war. Their own antisemitism has caused this vast crime to bounce off their consciousness. In nationalist thought there are facts which are both true and untrue, known and unknown. A known fact may be so unbearable that it is habitually pushed aside and not allowed to enter into logical processes, or on the other hand it may enter into every calculation and yet never be admitted as a fact, even in one's own mind.
 
CDNBear
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

Feel free to cite your own examples but really it shouldn't make any difference who does these things for it to be a war crime should it unless you subscribe to Orwell's theory of Moral Relativity:
Orwell: All nationalists have the power of not seeing resemblances between similar sets of facts. A British Tory will defend self-determination in Europe and oppose it in India with no feeling of inconsistency. Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage — torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians — which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘our’ side. The Liberal News Chronicle published, as an example of shocking barbarity, photographs of Russians hanged by the Germans, and then a year or two later published with warm approval almost exactly similar photographs of Germans hanged by the Russians(5). It is the same with historical events. History is thought of largely in nationalist terms, and such things as the Inquisition, the tortures of the Star Chamber, the exploits of the English buccaneers (Sir Francis Drake, for instance, who was given to sinking Spanish prisoners alive), the Reign of Terror, the heroes of...

Quote has been trimmed, See full post: View Post
I see a lot of EAO in there.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
Avatar
#22
You must be familiar with the links. So is the question to difficult.

12 Links - How many are Anti Israel. You tell me? It was posted by you. How well informed are you.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
+3
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

1) Deliberately firing missiles and mortars at civilians.
2) Not allowing a prisoner to be seen by the Red Cross
3) Suicide bombers against civilian targets....

I don't know but asking such stupid f*****g questions should be a "forum crime".
 
Goober
Free Thinker
+1
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

I don't know but asking such stupid f*****g questions should be a "forum crime".

He is a product of Dumb Design.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
+1
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

Anyone care to start a pole on how many posts it takes before a troll tries to turn this thread into a personal attack against eao? I predict 5.

You and Cannuck should start up your own forum where you could bleep back and forth at each other and leave intelligent life forms alone!
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#26
I have no problem condemning all 12 actions as war crimes. It shouldn't make any difference who does these things to make a determination.

Feel free to ignore any thread on this forum. But if you do post something on a thread, try to stay on topic...
 
TenPenny
Avatar
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

I have no problem condemning all 12 actions as war crimes. It shouldn't make any difference who does these things to make a determination.

You're right, it shouldn't. Which begs the question of how and why you pick the examples you do.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
Avatar
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

I have no problem condemning all 12 actions as war crimes. It shouldn't make any difference who does these things to make a determination.

Feel free to ignore any thread on this forum. But if you do post something on a thread, try to stay on topic...

I am - How many are Anti Israel - It goes to credibility and impartiality. Qualities of a good thread, ones that you profess to have as a person.
It is on topic. So how many
 
CDNBear
Avatar
+2
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by earth_as_oneView Post

I have no problem condemning all 12 actions as war crimes.

Right before you use moral relativity, and post graphs depicting the disparity in casualty figures, to demonize Israel.

Ya we all know what kind of non violent moral relativist pacifist you are.
 
earth_as_one
Avatar
#30
Part of my point here is to give people a chance to state where they stand on these kinds of actions. I've heard many people here condemn action 1 on this forum as a war crime, and perhaps #2 or 3. But very few people here on this forum, western leaders or news sources have ever described actions 4-12 as war crimes.

Now you have a chance to say whether these actions are or aren't war crimes for the record. Feel free to give your own examples to back up your point.
 

Similar Threads

0
Some American Police Actions
by missile | Apr 25th, 2005
8
USA Actions Since 1945
by Rick van Opbergen | Apr 2nd, 2005
no new posts