UN sustainable development summit shifts from climate change

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
UN sustainable development summit shifts from climate change

Jan 24 (Reuters) - Representatives from around the world gather in Rio in June to try to hammer out goals for sustainable development at a U.N. conference designed to avoid being tripped up by the intractable issue of climate change.

In an attempt to avoid too much confrontation, the conference will focus not on climate change but on sustainable development - making sure economies can grow now without endangering resources and the environment for future generations.

U.N. conferences over the past decade have begun with high hopes for agreements to compel nations to cut climate-warming emissions and help adapt to a hotter world, but they often ended with disappointingly modest results. That was the case last year in the global climate change summit in Durban, South Africa. Participants at that meeting agreed to forge a new deal by 2015 that would go into force by 2020.

The "sustainable" branding for this year's summit, rather than climate, is by design, said Ambassador Andre Correa do Lago, who headed Brazil's delegation to the U.N. climate talks in Durban and will be a chief negotiator for Brazil in Rio.

Sustainable development is an easier sell globally than climate change, even though sustainable development is a way of tackling global warming and other environmental issues, he said.

"Climate change is an (issue) that has very strong resistance from sectors that are going to be substantially altered, like the oil industry," do Lago said. "Sustainable development is something that is as simple as looking at how we would like to be in 10 or 20 years."

The time seems ripe. Natural resources are at a premium. The global human population tops 7 billion. Traditional economies are failing. And the planet is warming. Leaders may accept the premise that it makes sense to ensure rich and emerging nations can grow without further damaging the environment.

The focus of global meetings has been on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide, but the world's biggest emitters, including China and the United States, have balked, arguing it would cripple economic development.

Climate change first claimed the world stage at the U.N. Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro 20 years ago. That first Earth Summit in 1992 ultimately led to the carbon-capping Kyoto Protocol and a treaty on biodiversity.

This summit offers a chance to renew political will to make the world's economies greener.

"The debate's changed because of China, India, Brazil and South Africa, the very rapid and surprisingly powerful growth of the newly industrialized countries," he said.

Although fast-developing economies are eager for this shift, Wirth said there may be resistance from big energy powers like the United States and some oil producers in the Middle East.

"These are the countries that say, 'Hey, this is our sandbox, you can't get into it,'" he said. "But I think that's passing by very quickly."

Rio+20 will have to give the private sector the clarity and incentives they need over the medium term, Starbuck said.

Any goals set in Rio would likely be for the next 20 years, which could be too far in the future for most chief executives whose time in office is more likely to last years, not decades. Instead, interim goals set along the way to 2030 would make the private sector more likely to engage, Starbuck added.

UN sustainable development summit shifts from climate change | Agricultural Commodities | Reuters
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
Read that as: Let's destroy the manufacturing base of the developed countries, so all the non-developed ones can bring themselves to the newly lowered standards of those countries that used to provide the world with goods.

And Mental Floss actually supports such an idea!
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Read that as: Let's destroy the manufacturing base of the developed countries, so all the non-developed ones can bring themselves to the newly lowered standards of those countries that used to provide the world with goods.

And Mental Floss actually supports such an idea!

Mentalfloss posts A. Old Medic interprets A as B. Therefore Mentalfloss supports B.

Do you know what logic is? If you do, how many problems can you identify with the above?