Iranian regime ‘frightens me,’ Harper says

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Iranian regime ‘frightens me,’ Harper says

Prime Minister Stephen Harper says a consensus is growing among world leaders that Iran would have no hesitation using nuclear arms once they develop the weapons and the capability to deliver them.

“I’ve watched and listened to what the leadership in the Iran regime says, and it frightens me,” Mr. Harper said in a CBC interview.

“In my judgment, these are people who have a particular, you know, fanatically religious worldview, and their statements imply to me no hesitation of using nuclear weapons if they see them achieving their religious or political purposes,” he said.

Asked why world leaders are not doing more about it, Mr. Harper said a consensus among world leaders has been growing “at least privately.”

Mr. Harper acknowledged that the current round of sanctions is not dissuading the Iranian regime from developing “the nuclear course.” However, the world remains uncertain about what exactly to do, he said.

Every country agrees on sanctions and is imposing sanctions “at some level,” he said. “Beyond that, these are not easy questions for the world,” he said.

Military action has been discussed, Mr. Harper added. “President [Barak] Obama’s said all options are on the table and I can certainly tell you that, when we talk about these issues, we talk about the full range of questions around these issues.

“But there is certainly no consensus on, you know, ultimately how to deal with this matter.”

Canada’s position on dealing with Iran is that allies should work together, Mr. Harper said. “I’ve raised the alarm as much as I can, but obviously I don’t advocate particular actions publicly. I work with our allies to see if we get consensus on actions,” he said.

Mr. Harper said he has no doubt that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. “There is absolutely no doubt they are lying,” Mr. Harper said, referring to statements by Iran that the nuclear program is for peaceful uses. “The evidence is just growing overwhelming. This is not, as was the case of Iraq, merely the opinion of allies,” he said.

The development of nuclear weapons as one of the purposes of Iran’s nuclear program “is just beyond dispute at this point,” he said. “The only dispute is how far advanced it is and how far off it will be until they actually develop those weapons and develop the capability of delivering the weapons.”

Also during the interview, Mr. Harper linked the debate over the controversial Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to Texas with concern over Iran’s threat to blockade the main shipping route for oil in the Middle East.

“It’s pretty obvious what the right decision is … not just from an economic and environmental standpoint, but from an energy security standpoint,” Mr. Harper said.

“When you look at the Iranians threatening to block the Strait of Hormuz, I think that just illustrates how critical it is that supply for the United States be North American,” Mr. Harper said.

Mr. Harper said the controversy in the U.S. over approval of the Keystone pipeline was “a wakeup call” to Canada. The issue indicates the degree to which Canada is “dependent or possibly held hostage” to decisions in the U.S.

The Conservative government is going to make “an additional push” to make sure Canada diversifies its energy markets,” he said. “It puts an emphasis on the fact that we must perform our regulatory processes to get timely decisions on diversification of our markets.”

Mr. Harper said he did not object to the regulatory process for the Northern Gateway pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific Coast. His concern was to have “timely” decisions made.

“We can’t have processes that are just filibustered endlessly. That is not in anyone’s interests,” he said.

The government would seriously consider the recommendations of the environmental review, he said. “This government has in the past changed projects or even stopped projects if reviews were not favourable or indicated that changes had to be made,” he said, in an oblique reference to the government’s controversial decision to reject the Prosperity Mine in B.C.

He repeated his concern about foreign financed groups delaying the process. He did not agree that he was holding a double standard by not objecting to foreign companies advocating for the pipeline.

“Just because certain people in the United States would like to see Canada be one giant national park for the northern half of North America, I don’t think that’s part of what our review process is all about,” Mr. Harper said.

“I don’t object to foreigners expressing their opinion. But I don’t want them to be able to hijack the process,” Mr. Harper said.

Iranian regime 'frighten's me,' Harper says - The Globe and Mail
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
He repeated his concern about foreign financed groups delaying the process. He did not agree that he was holding a double standard by not objecting to foreign companies advocating for the pipeline.

I think this is a more telling quote. He is so hypocritical that he doesn't even know he is. That is one of the reasons Harper frightens me more than Iran. In fact, I feel nothing about Iran except that they are getting the bum's rush from the west.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,359
568
113
59
Alberta
He repeated his concern about foreign financed groups delaying the process. He did not agree that he was holding a double standard by not objecting to foreign companies advocating for the pipeline.

I think this is a more telling quote. He is so hypocritical that he doesn't even know he is. That is one of the reasons Harper frightens me more than Iran. In fact, I feel nothing about Iran except that they are getting the bum's rush from the west.

Last I checked, one of Mr. Harper's worst crimes was to hold a Free Vote on Gay marriage - while Mr. Ahmadinejad publicly hangs gays.

What a hypocrite Mr. Harper is.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Last I checked, one of Mr. Harper's worst crimes was to hold a Free Vote on Gay marriage - while Mr. Ahmadinejad publicly hangs gays.

What a hypocrite Mr. Harper is.
I doubt Mr Imanutjob had anything to do with hanging gays. He is just a mouth piece for the lunatic fundies he works for.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
Seriously? That's your argument?

Last I checked, one of Mr. Harper's worst crimes was to hold a Free Vote on Gay marriage - while Mr. Ahmadinejad publicly hangs gays.

What a hypocrite Mr. Harper is.

Well, your argument is that Harper is not a hypocrite because the actions of people in Iran are consistent with their worldview that you view as immoral? Your argument has more holes than premises.

“In my judgment, these are people who have a particular, you know, fanatically religious worldview, and their statements imply to me no hesitation of using nuclear weapons if they see them achieving their religious or political purposes,” he said.

Then there are countries that continue to develop and detonate nuclear weapons, and yet we sell uranium to them. The IAEA continues to show non-diversion of uranium in Iran, and the so-called evidence of a weapons program is undisclosed hearsay from an unnamed third party (nation).

As a matter of the public record, there is absolutely nothing to hold up Harper's allegations. It strikes me as more of his US fanboyism.

Steven Harper: US fanboy #1.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Not EAO, Iran is a bastion of religious and politcal tolerance.
Because I'm against unsubstantiated BS like most of Harper's comments above, doesn't mean that an agnostic like myself supports the Iranian Theocracy.... which is more democratic than the US plutocracy IMO. IN Iran, candidates are vetted by the religious Mullahs and then the people vote. In the US, UK and to some degree in Canada, only people with the support of wealthy people have a chance of becoming an elected leader. That would make us more of a Plutocracy than a true Democracy, despite claims to the contrary about the fairness and openness of our electoral system.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
Because I'm against unsubstantiated BS like most of Harper's comments above, doesn't mean that an agnostic like myself supports the Iranian Theocracy.... which is more democratic than the US plutocracy IMO. IN Iran, candidates are vetted by the religious Mullahs and then the people vote. In the US, UK and to some degree in Canada, only people with the support of wealthy people have a chance of becoming an elected leader. That would make us more of a Plutocracy than a true Democracy, despite claims to the contrary about the fairness and openness of our electoral system.

What is funnier is that any time anyone discusses the middle east, you have to compare them with the US and/or Israel.

You are incapable of not making any discussion into an anti-US or anti-Israel discussion, as you have just proven.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks at their neighbors.

If we criticize their system, then our system should be more fair than their system. I'm saying our "democracy", isn't really all that democratic. BTW, most Iranians believe they live in a true democracy too.
 
Last edited: