Preparations to Attack Iran???


Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
Avatar
#1
--
Defense Ministry Expects US to 'Fast-Forward' Plans for Attack

by Jason Ditz, November 02, 2011

With Defense Ministry officials saying that they believe the US may soon “fast-forward” plans to attack Iran, --.
The -- expectations that next week’s report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will be a “game changer” and will convince President Obama to launch another massive war.
It also comes -- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is hoping to convince the rest of his cabinet to launch a unilateral attack on Iran before winter on the argument that an autumn war would be much more convenient.

--


this is getting more than a little frightening.

US House Committee Okays Sweeping Sanctions on Iran

--


here we go again......
 
Colpy
Conservative
Avatar
+3
#2
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean BreezeView Post

Britain Prepares to Attack Iran
Defense Ministry Expects US to 'Fast-Forward' Plans for Attack
by Jason Ditz, November 02, 2011
With Defense Ministry officials saying that they believe the US may soon “fast-forward” plans to attack Iran, Britain’s military is stepping up its own preparations for such an attack under the assumption that they will join in on the war.
The planning is based on expectations that next week’s report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will be a “game changer” and will convince President Obama to launch another massive war.
It also comes

Quote has been trimmed, See full post: View Post


These people are idiots.

Neither Britain NOR the USA will attack Iran.

The Obama administration already denied their super bunker-buster bombs to Israel in a bid to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran.

Israel very well might attack Iran, as Iran is constantly attacking Israel through its proxies (Islamic Jihad, hezbollah and Hamas). Israel has VERY good reason to fear a nuclear armed Iran, and I certainly hope Israel takes whatever steps are necessary to prevent a nuclear armed Iran, as it is simply a looney-state. If they get the bomb, there is an excellent chance it will be used.

Even Saudi-Arabia wants Israel to smash Iran's nuclear program........

 
Retired_Can_Soldier
#3
Jason Ditz isn't exactly what I'd call a model of Journalistic Integrity.
 
petros
Avatar
#4
Did Iran get the Russian S-300 missile system up and running? I wonder how well it works?
 
Johnnny
Avatar
+2
#5
Unless Iran wants to switch to civilian nuclear power like us i dont see a reason why they shouldnt have nuclear power available to their civilian infrastructure. But if they want to wipe israel off the map, they wouldnt do so. They apparently represent the best interests of their fellow muslims in the region... And wiping the israelis and palastinians muslims off the map(at the same time with nuclear weapons) isnt a way to make a point to the zionist movement... Yes im drunk
 
petros
#6
Fallout is a bitch.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
Avatar
+1
#7
Yup! Nuking Israel would be self destructive. They may be crazy (I don't believe the BS about Iran) but they ain't stupid.

Also, an attack on Iran would really piss off the Chinese, I would think. They seem to have invested interests there. as well as the Russians. But then the fundies on both sides are getting tired of waitin' on god to get this "end of days" shyte happenin'.
 
Colpy
Conservative
-1
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Yup! Nuking Israel would be self destructive. They may be crazy (I don't believe the BS about Iran) but they ain't stupid.

Also, an attack on Iran would really piss off the Chinese, I would think. They seem to have invested interests there. as well as the Russians. But then the fundies on both sides are getting tired of waitin' on god to get this "end of days" shyte happenin'.

Fcuk the Chinese.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+4
#9  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Fcuk the Chinese.

I've seen a few that I wouldn't mind....
 
petros
+1
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Fcuk the Chinese.

They have one in Hong Kong
 
damngrumpy
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#11
Social media is such a wonderful thing, some journalist uses the information that
is real or imagined and everyone begins to speculate on what ever the flavour of
the day is. Iran would not be a great target at the moment as the Arab world is
already fragmented and in turmoil. Why would Israel, Britain or America want to
unite them, It makes no sense
 
EagleSmack
Avatar
+1
#12
There go the war mongers again. Still aching for a new war on Iran. People like Breezy have been wanting this war for years now but clearly they still have hope.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

These people are idiots.

Neither Britain NOR the USA will attack Iran.

The Obama administration already denied their super bunker-buster bombs to Israel in a bid to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran.

Israel very well might attack Iran, as Iran is constantly attacking Israel through its proxies (Islamic Jihad, hezbollah and Hamas). Israel has VERY good reason to fear a nuclear armed Iran, and I certainly hope Israel takes whatever steps are necessary to prevent a nuclear armed Iran, as it is simply a looney-state. If they get the bomb, there is an excellent chance it will be used.

Even Saudi-Arabia wants Israel to smash Iran's nuclear program........

[/FONT]

Isreal recieved the bunker busters a month or 2 ago.
 
wulfie68
No Party Affiliation
+2
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Fallout is a bitch.

But its an awesome computer game!

I just shake my head at these fearmongering threads thats Breezy & Co. have been starting: yes plans exist to attack pretty much every country on the planet. Its called contingency planning, and any military worth a crap has them, and they include military action against allies, aliens and zombie plagues. Its the job of planners to come up with responses to any scenario you can think of, no matter how far fetched. The reality is that the vast majority of these contingencies will never see the light of day, because the events that would bring them about won't materialize.

Now it is more likely that Iran could trigger aggressive action from the West than a zombie plague, but thats not saying much.
 
Cannuck
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

These people are idiots.....



....The Obama administration already denied their super bunker-buster bombs to Israel in a bid to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran.

--

It would appear that they aren't the only idiots.
 
Colpy
Conservative
Avatar
+1
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by Retired_Can_SoldierView Post

Jason Ditz isn't exactly what I'd call a model of Journalistic Integrity.

Well-named though......

Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

--

It would appear that they aren't the only idiots.

Excellent!

The idiots are the ones that would let the psycho leaders of Iran develop nukes.

It is a damn shame, as an attack will undoubtedly unite the country, and one had hoped the Iranian freedom movement would make some progress. The regime will no doubt use and Israeli attack as an excuse to jail, torture and murder as many dissidents as it can.

But the lesser of two evils is a destroyed Iranian nuclear weapons program. Much lesser.
 
petros
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Even Saudi-Arabia wants Israel to smash Iran's nuclear program...

The Saudis the crime family nobody pays attention to.
 
Colpy
Conservative
Avatar
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

The Saudis the crime family nobody pays attention to.

Absolutely!

Wouldn't it be nice if we could be weaned off Saudi oil???, and then fcuk them too.

 
petros
Avatar
#19
It's more than just oil. It's where and who they put their money behind. They play dirty.
 
Colpy
Conservative
Avatar
#20
Yep, no problem with peace-loving Iran having Nukes!!!

Islamic Jihad: Israel truce will not last, ready for all-out war | News | National Post

The rulers in Iran, after all, are perfectly sane!

--
 
MHz
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Absolutely!

Wouldn't it be nice if we could be weaned off Saudi oil???, and then fcuk them too.

They (since you aren't even American) by developing alternatives or existing reserves, trouble is that would leave all that oil for other Nations to use and that would mean their development would surpass the US in a very short period of time, that is why the US is so involved in controlling the oil, at any price in terms of dollars and amount of violence. Why would they attack Israel, that would mean they would have to send troops over there to hold onto the land, a task that is impossible as America knows from the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions. Israel has nothing Iran even needs and the ones that should be protecting Gaza and the West Bank are the ones who voted 'yes' to UN 181, they are the ones who have fallen flat on their lying faces, Canada being close to the top og the list of the hypocrites considering their blanket endorsement of any/all things concerning Israel.

--

Ahmadinejad and Iran have not attacked another country in 200 years, while America has attacked other countries over 200 times in the same time period.
 
Colpy
Conservative
Avatar
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

They (since you aren't even American) by developing alternatives or existing reserves, trouble is that would leave all that oil for other Nations to use and that would mean their development would surpass the US in a very short period of time, that is why the US is so involved in controlling the oil, at any price in terms of dollars and amount of violence. Why would they attack Israel, that would mean they would have to send troops over there to hold onto the land, a task that is impossible as America knows from the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions. Israel has nothing Iran even needs and the ones that should be protecting Gaza and the West Bank are the ones who voted 'yes' to UN 181, they are the ones who have fallen flat on their lying faces, Canada being close to the top og the list of the hypocrites considering their blanket endorsement of any/all things concerning Israel.

--

Ahmadinejad and Iran have not attacked another country in 200 years, while America has attacked other countries over 200 times in the same time period.

First off all, if it would throw development initiative to other countries, why would we give up oil? Especially when WE (Canada) have huge reserves, and yet the east of the country depends on oil from off-shore.

You don't need an army to launch a nuke....or to smuggle one to Islamic Jihad.......

Israel has been under attack from Iran for decades........read the article I posted below.
 
MHz
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

First off all, if it would throw development initiative to other countries, why would we give up oil? Especially when WE (Canada) have huge reserves, and yet the east of the country depends on oil from off-shore.

You don't need an army to launch a nuke....or to smuggle one to Islamic Jihad.......

Israel has been under attack from Iran for decades........read the article I posted below.

Run some (new lines as the old ones are being shut down due to age)lines going East rather than all of them going south, how hard is that to figure out. Probably has more to resentment from the east in that the only product ever allowed to come from the west had been wheat (and other grains and some horse meat, euw) Who freighters over the oil, Canada Steamships? (all of which are owned my former PM martin and all of which are registered off-shore just so Canada gets no tax revenue, shoddy to say the least)
They have been neighbors for about 5,000 years, we killed off 99% of the locals when 'we' first arrived here (couple of centuries), who is the bigger threat to 'neighbors' us (remnants of Britannia) or people that have had Jews living in their country for many 100's of years, after all there had to be for some to be expelled following the Jewish massacres and mass deportations of just Arabs following the signing of UN 181 in Nov of 1947.

You need to post something 'below' before I can be expected to read it.
 
EagleSmack
Avatar
#24
MHz... If you want a war with Iran then petition your own government. You war mongers have been predicting and hoping for a war between the US and Iran since the Bush years... maybe before. If you want it so bad then start a movement.
 
Colpy
Conservative
Avatar
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Run some (new lines as the old ones are being shut down due to age)lines going East rather than all of them going south, how hard is that to figure out. Probably has more to resentment from the east in that the only product ever allowed to come from the west had been wheat (and other grains and some horse meat, euw) Who freighters over the oil, Canada Steamships? (all of which are owned my former PM martin and all of which are registered off-shore just so Canada gets no tax revenue, shoddy to say the least)
They have been neighbors for about 5,000 years, we killed off 99% of the locals when 'we' first arrived here (couple of centuries), who is the bigger threat to 'neighbors' us (remnants of Britannia) or people that have had Jews living in their country for many 100's of years, after all there had to be for some to be expelled following the Jewish massacres and mass deportations of just Arabs following the signing of UN 181 in Nov of 1947.

You need to post something 'below' before I can be expected to read it.

Islamic Jihad: Israel truce will not last, ready for all-out war | News | National Post
 
MHz
#26
Wonder if this 'fighter' will be there?
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Wonder if this 'fighter' will be there?



Barry Rubin: Don’t worry, Israel won
 
darkbeaver
Republican
Avatar
#28
Israel was never meant to last longer than necessary. It was meant to last only as long as it took. To rob the planet blind.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

Israel was never meant to last longer than necessary. It was meant to last only as long as it took. To rob the planet blind.

Well the Chinese have Trillions - So Israel should be around for quite some time.
 
Cannuck
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
+1
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Excellent!

The idiots are the ones that would let the psycho leaders of Iran develop nukes.

Well, yes but, I was referring to idiots that post on web forums that "The Obama administration already denied their super bunker-buster bombs to Israel" when those that follow these sorts of things know different. One would think that people would try and stay current on these types of things before they start spouting off.
 

Similar Threads

0
World 'would rue' attack on Iran
by Praxius | Jul 14th, 2008
39
Israelis 'rehearse Iran attack'
by Praxius | Jul 3rd, 2008
49
Iran 'behind Green Zone attack'
by Praxius | Mar 26th, 2008
17
'America Would Back Israel Attack on Iran'
by Vanni Fucci | Feb 27th, 2005
no new posts