"It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world."
George Washington.
"Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto"
Thomas Jefferson
"I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government [to be] peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none."
Thomas Jefferson
How much do you agree with these basic statements?
Personally, I'd love to see Canada pull out of NATO, NORAD, and other alliances and just focus instead on friendly relations, very much as the US Founding Fathers had suggested.
More recent quotes on Neutrality from the US include this from Truman:
"We must make the United Nations continue to work, and to be a going concern, to see that difficulties between nations may be settled just as we settle difficulties between States here in the United States. When Kansas and Colorado fall out over the waters in the Arkansas River, they don't go to war over it, they go to the Supreme Court of the United States, and the matter is settled in a just and honorable way. There is not a difficulty in the whole world that cannot be settled in exactly the same way in a world court."
This is not unique to US history either though, as exemplified by Lord Tennyson in the following quote from his poem Locksley Hall, written in 1835:
George Washington.
"Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto"
Thomas Jefferson
"I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government [to be] peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none."
Thomas Jefferson
How much do you agree with these basic statements?
Personally, I'd love to see Canada pull out of NATO, NORAD, and other alliances and just focus instead on friendly relations, very much as the US Founding Fathers had suggested.
More recent quotes on Neutrality from the US include this from Truman:
"We must make the United Nations continue to work, and to be a going concern, to see that difficulties between nations may be settled just as we settle difficulties between States here in the United States. When Kansas and Colorado fall out over the waters in the Arkansas River, they don't go to war over it, they go to the Supreme Court of the United States, and the matter is settled in a just and honorable way. There is not a difficulty in the whole world that cannot be settled in exactly the same way in a world court."
This is not unique to US history either though, as exemplified by Lord Tennyson in the following quote from his poem Locksley Hall, written in 1835:
"For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see,Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be;Saw the heavens fill with commerce, argosies of magic sails,Pilots of the purple twilight, dropping down with costly bales;Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there raind a ghastly dewFrom the nations airy navies grappling in the central blue;Far along the world-wide whisper of the south-wind rushing warm,With the standards of the peoples plunging thro the thunder-storm;Till the war-drums throbbd, no longer, and the battle-flags were furldIn the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world. There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe,And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law."
Would a neutral foreign policy be a wise idea, or is it preferable for Canada to take sides by joining in alliances?
Would a neutral foreign policy be a wise idea, or is it preferable for Canada to take sides by joining in alliances?