Federal government admits deliberately leaving numbers on Oilsands UN Report

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Oilsands emissions data left out of UN report

Federal government admits deliberately leaving numbers out that indicate pollution from oilsands production outstrips auto emissions

The federal government has acknowledged that it deliberately excluded data indicating a 20 per cent increase in pollution from Canada's oilsands industry in 2009 from a recent 567-page report on climate change that it was required to submit to the United Nations.

The numbers, uncovered by Postmedia News, were left out of the report, a national inventory on Canada's greenhouse gas pollution. Overall, the report revealed a six per cent drop in annual emissions for the entire economy from 2008 to 2009, but does not directly show the extent of pollution from the oilsands production, which is now greater than the greenhouse gas emissions of all the cars driven on Canadian roads.

The data also indicated that emissions per barrel of oil produced by the sector is increasing, despite claims made by the industry in an advertising campaign.

"The oilsands remain Canada's fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas pollution, and they're the subject of a huge amount of attention and scrutiny in Canada and internationally," said Clare Demerse, director of climate change at the Pembina Institute, an Albertabased environmental research group. "So it's very disappointing to see Environment Canada publish a 500-page report that leaves out these critical numbers -especially when last year's edition included them."

Overall, Environment Canada said that the oilsands industry was responsible for about 6.5 per cent of Canada's annual greenhouse gas emissions in 2009, up from five per cent in 2008. This also indicates a growth in emissions that is close to about 300 per cent since 1990, which cancel out many reductions in pollution from other economic sectors.

http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Oilsands+emissions+data+left+report/4861017/story.html
 
Last edited:

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Fair question, but that leads us directly to the issue of GHG's for starters and then later onto the economic vs environment debate.

We've been down this road and I believe that you'll agree it's gets pretty bumpy.
 

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
When we hand out blame for oilsand GHGs, who gets the blame for the consumption of the oil? Alberta, or the out of province consumers?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Well, by leaving the numbers out of Canada's national inventory, it appears Ottawa is saying it's not anyone in Canada...
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
It would seem to me that the consumer is responsible for the GHG since if there was no demand for the product the oilsands would not even exist.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,351
557
113
59
Alberta
Well, by leaving the numbers out of Canada's national inventory, it appears Ottawa is saying it's not anyone in Canada...

Now there's a young go getter.
Come on over son and let's discuss an ad campaign for what I like to call: BIG TOBACCO AND YOU!:smile:
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,389
113
Low Earth Orbit
When we hand out blame for oilsand GHGs, who gets the blame for the consumption of the oil? Alberta, or the out of province consumers?
Try out of country consumers for the real blame and blame NAFTA for proportionate delivery ratios. Where we HAVE TO SELL TO US before ourselves.