Quoting
quandary121
SO THE DOCTOR SITED IN THIS VIDEO IS WRONG TO SCARE US IN THIS WAY IS THAT WHAT YOUR SAYING
Yes, that is what I'm saying. Dr. Laibow practices drug free medicine, and so as part of her position at Natural Solutions Foundation, she campaigns against drugs.
It's unlikely that a pandemic can be stopped. The turnaround from known threat to viable vaccine is not a large window. But how do you think that could be done with natural medicine? Nutrition is key to her foundations successes, and that's great. But with so many countries with poor malnourished people, it's also highly unlikely. The threat will likely emerge from Asia, where there are many poor subsistence farmers who live with their flocks of birds and their feces in close quarters.
If you have a highly pathogenic outbreak in Asia, and it mutates in the human host after leaving the avian vector, nutrition won't help at all. Vaccinations might have a shot, but it's still a Hail Mary. You have to isolate the specific strain of H5N1 in the early stages and then mass produce a vaccine, very quickly. There's only three companies worldwide which have developed the technology to do this.
Having a vaccine now with H5N1 DNA won't likely help, because there is no pandemic, the markers won't likely be correct due to the high mutation rate. But having a vaccine with H5N1 DNA also will not increase the likelihood of a pandemic. It just doesn't work that way. There are dozens of the 'highly pathogenic variety', and many more of the 'low pathogenic variety'.
What you aren't getting, is that this isn't a live complete virus. It has DNA from some strain of H5N1, but it isn't a complete virus. The virus we're concerned about, needs all 8 strands of RNA in order to replicate in the host cells. The vaccine doesn't require DNA that allows a virus to replicate, only the DNA which codes for surface proteins, which is how your leukocytes recognize foreign objects, and make the antibodies.
Just because someone with some letters behind their name says you should be concerned, doesn't mean they're correct. Where is her research? There's libraries of supporting research worldwide that supports vaccination programs. The letters behind the name are an appeal to authority without the actual data and statistics to back up what she says.
This is much ado about nothing.
