I was listening to him on the radio today speaking about the liberation of Iraq and the implementation of democracy. It was interesting to hear his opinion on what went wrong. He said he believes the premise of democracy being an important factor for stablizing the region is incorrect.
He said, paraphrased, 'if you implement democracy into a region like that you force everyone to create political parties, which in turn everyone creates the same tribal-customed parties, and each one then elects a general to co-ordinate a war with the other parties'.
Nothing changes except the violence becomes better co-ordinated. With a long history of undemocratic rule they are more peaceful without democracy.
..........
I still personally believe that the biggest strategic error was not improving relations with Hussein both before and after GW1. He wasn't a great guy by any stretch but it worked in Iraq. He was fighting the same nuts the west is today. His demonization was fueled by the political propoganda campaign of the century.
He said, paraphrased, 'if you implement democracy into a region like that you force everyone to create political parties, which in turn everyone creates the same tribal-customed parties, and each one then elects a general to co-ordinate a war with the other parties'.
Nothing changes except the violence becomes better co-ordinated. With a long history of undemocratic rule they are more peaceful without democracy.
..........
I still personally believe that the biggest strategic error was not improving relations with Hussein both before and after GW1. He wasn't a great guy by any stretch but it worked in Iraq. He was fighting the same nuts the west is today. His demonization was fueled by the political propoganda campaign of the century.