Jagmeet Singh is a hypocrite

AMKiller

Electoral Member
Sep 11, 2017
241
0
16
Burlington
He says he doesn't support hate but his vote against Motion 36 which rejects the boycott of Israeli goods and the BDS movement says different. Singh also sponsored a press conference attended by 9/11 truthers and anti-Israel activists in support of Nadia Shoufani who made inflammatory comments about Israel at that hatefest known as the Al-Quds day rally.

Why is it that a white person speaking their mind is full of hate but minorities doing the same thing are "free expressions of dissent"?

Double standard? Ya think?
 

AMKiller

Electoral Member
Sep 11, 2017
241
0
16
Burlington
Since our media is lefty run what do you expect? Truth? Facts? unlikely. Just look at how much effort they put into silencing Ezra Lavant.
I'm not a fan of Ezra Levant. He does more harm than good.

Notice how when Liberals disagree with someone, that someone is spewing hate. But when they agree with a form of "hate speech" it's a "free expression of dissent".
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
I guessed that Singh’s position on the ban was actually what this woman was raving about. And, sure enough, she later posted a video to Facebook confirming this was the case.

Seems to be the heart of the matter right there.
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Typical of these brown people, they like to call racism against Whites, but when Browns do it, it seems to be perfectly acceptable with these Brown types.

Canadians have always given these minorities a lot of slack and often overlooked their faults only because Canadians felt they were disadvantaged in some respect.

But these Browns have taken full advantage of the good nature of Canadians and now they feel they are entitled to benefits other Canadians are held to account for.

Time to call a spade a spade and call this Brown dude a racist.
 

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
Jagmeet Singh isn’t a hypocrite. He is a great political leader who will not only become the NDP leader for sure, but hopefully someday Prime Minister too. Now don’t get me wrong, I like Trudeau a lot and wouldn’t mind a Liberal government under Trudeau for decades to come. I’m not a leftist but rather more of a liberal centrist with a libertarian streak. That means I prefer low taxes, small government, privatization as much as possible, maximum civil liberty, and overall a free market with free trade and an open door immigration policy. But I recognize that Jagmeet Singh is the strongest voice against racism and bigotry at the moment, and these are the most pressing issues of the day. As a fellow South Asian, I’m naturally inclined to Jagmeet Singh and sincerely hope he becomes more influential in politics. He’s still relatively young, 38 years old, and I can see he has a bright future in federal politics. We need more young, cosmopolitan, racial minority, charismatic figures like him. The NDP will pass into oblivion if it chooses anyone else besides Jagmeet. The NDP needs to acquire the support of people like me, young, Middle Class, South Asian visible minority, cosmopolitan, from the growing Peel Region of Ontario. Otherwise the NDP has no future, simple as that. At present, the NDP old timers are resistant to Jagmeet Singh for two reasons: 1. They simply don’t want a South Asian in command of their party, they use the excuse “Quebec won’t accept him”, but in reality, they themselves aren’t ready for a non-White at the helm, and 2. They claim Jagmeet isn’t radical leftist enough. But that’s actually a good thing. We need someone like Jagmeet to mainstream the NDP and bring it closer to the center, especially on economic issues.
 

AMKiller

Electoral Member
Sep 11, 2017
241
0
16
Burlington
Jagmeet Singh isn’t a hypocrite. He is a great political leader who will not only become the NDP leader for sure, but hopefully someday Prime Minister too. Now don’t get me wrong, I like Trudeau a lot and wouldn’t mind a Liberal government under Trudeau for decades to come. I’m not a leftist but rather more of a liberal centrist with a libertarian streak. That means I prefer low taxes, small government, privatization as much as possible, maximum civil liberty, and overall a free market with free trade and an open door immigration policy. But I recognize that Jagmeet Singh is the strongest voice against racism and bigotry at the moment, and these are the most pressing issues of the day. As a fellow South Asian, I’m naturally inclined to Jagmeet Singh and sincerely hope he becomes more influential in politics. He’s still relatively young, 38 years old, and I can see he has a bright future in federal politics. We need more young, cosmopolitan, racial minority, charismatic figures like him. The NDP will pass into oblivion if it chooses anyone else besides Jagmeet. The NDP needs to acquire the support of people like me, young, Middle Class, South Asian visible minority, cosmopolitan, from the growing Peel Region of Ontario. Otherwise the NDP has no future, simple as that. At present, the NDP old timers are resistant to Jagmeet Singh for two reasons: 1. They simply don’t want a South Asian in command of their party, they use the excuse “Quebec won’t accept him”, but in reality, they themselves aren’t ready for a non-White at the helm, and 2. They claim Jagmeet isn’t radical leftist enough. But that’s actually a good thing. We need someone like Jagmeet to mainstream the NDP and bring it closer to the center, especially on economic issues.
You want low taxes, small government, maximum civil liberties and privatization and you want an NDP or a Liberal government, lol. These parties contradict everything you claim you want. Good luck getting those things with either of those parties in charge. You're a walking oxymoron.

An open door immigration policy is not what Canada wants.

You're not a Libertarian as you claim but you are a leftist.

Singh is a hypocrite for those reasons I stated above.
 
Last edited:

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
You want low taxes, small government, maximum civil liberties and privatization and you want an NDP or a Liberal government, lol. These parties contradict everything you claim you want. Good luck getting those things with either of those parties in charge. You're a walking oxymoron.

An open door immigration policy is not what Canada wants.

You're not a Libertarian as you claim but you are a leftist.

Singh is a hypocrite for those reasons I stated above.

I never said I'm a libertarian, but rather that I have a libertarian streak. Even the Conservative Party isn't as libertarian as you think. In fact, they love to increase military and police spending, which libertarianism opposes.

Furthermore, I'm not a registered member of any political party. But for me, the problem of racism and attacks on multiculturalism are more pressing than any economic issues. This is why I prefer a Liberal or NDP government, even if I'm not exactly a fan of either's economic policies and platforms. As a racial minority that is South Asian and Muslim, I don't have the luxury to be immediately concerned about the budget, taxes or size of government. I will simply express support for that politician who is most beneficial to my community.

An open door immigration policy is what Canada needs. We need cheap labor and we also need skilled labor. We actually have one of the more restrictive and tough immigration systems of the developed world. We need to relax it and allow for millions of more immigrants, especially skilled immigrants from Asia. We could also benefit from more unskilled labor from Mesoamerica since America is closing its door to them. We will benefit from this economically and also socially. When you say what Canada wants, you are talking about the declining majority of old White people. That is the old Canada, we are working on strengthening a new Canada.
 

AMKiller

Electoral Member
Sep 11, 2017
241
0
16
Burlington
I never said I'm a libertarian, but rather that I have a libertarian streak. Even the Conservative Party isn't as libertarian as you think. In fact, they love to increase military and police spending, which libertarianism opposes.

Furthermore, I'm not a registered member of any political party. But for me, the problem of racism and attacks on multiculturalism are more pressing than any economic issues. This is why I prefer a Liberal or NDP government, even if I'm not exactly a fan of either's economic policies and platforms. As a racial minority that is South Asian and Muslim, I don't have the luxury to be immediately concerned about the budget, taxes or size of government. I will simply express support for that politician who is most beneficial to my community.

An open door immigration policy is what Canada needs. We need cheap labor and we also need skilled labor. We actually have one of the more restrictive and tough immigration systems of the developed world. We need to relax it and allow for millions of more immigrants, especially skilled immigrants from Asia. We could also benefit from more unskilled labor from Mesoamerica since America is closing its door to them. We will benefit from this economically and also socially. When you say what Canada wants, you are talking about the declining majority of old White people. That is the old Canada, we are working on strengthening a new Canada.
You've been spoon fed talking points on racism. Stop feeling sorry for yourself, you aren't being discriminated against. Multiculturalism doesn't work, it never has in any country.

No, racism and multiculturalism aren't as important as the economy. You can't excel and maximize your earning potential with a bad economy.

The Conservative Party aren't Libertarian either but they are the better option when it comes to minimizing the things you claim you want.

You want cheap labor? You want to keep people poor? Ridiculous. How about we train and employ those people already here.

I think you don't know what you want or are asking for.
 

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
You've been spoon fed talking points on racism. Stop feeling sorry for yourself, you aren't being discriminated against. Multiculturalism doesn't work, it never has in any country.

No, racism and multiculturalism aren't as important as the economy. You can't excel and maximize your earning potential with a bad economy.

The Conservative Party aren't Libertarian either but they are the better option when it comes to minimizing the things you claim you want.

You want cheap labor? You want to keep people poor? Ridiculous. How about we train and employ those people already here.

I think you don't know what you want or are asking for.

What makes you say multiculturalism doesn’t work? It works very well, it is essential for any nation to grow and be socially cohesive into the 21st century. Why do you think there are much worse social problems in the United States and Europe? Because none of them have adapted the policy of multiculturalism that originated in Trudeau’s era here in Canada. The U.S. is a land of race riots, and Europe is falling into the clutch of extremely far-Right White nationalist parties, because none of those places have genuine multiculturalism, with the exception of California, New York, Chicago, Boston and similar major urban centers. But you will find that those places are the most prosperous and best places in America precisely because of cosmopolitanism or multiculturalism.

If not multiculturalism, then what do you propose? Please be specific.
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Multiculturalism doesn't work, it never has in any country.


You want cheap labor.
If this ZulF fool likes multiculturalism so much and wants cheap labour, he should move to his native country of India, it's multicultural, cheap labour and most of all there are very few Whites there so he won't have much competition and no discrimination.

Mind you the lack of Whites there is one reason India is such a pure shit hole, but I think this is what he wants.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Some will argue that immigration hurts the economy more than benefits it. Firstly, research shows otherwise. Secondly, if cost were a legitimate concern, then no one would object to Svalbard-style open borders which simply grant visa-free access to work but not social services. Those that oppose that have no economic leg to stand on.
 

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
If this ZulF fool likes multiculturalism so much and wants cheap labour, he should move to his native country of India, it's multicultural, cheap labour and most of all there are very few Whites there so he won't have much competition and no discrimination.

Mind you the lack of Whites there is one reason India is such a pure shit hole, but I think this is what he wants.






Actually, India is rising fast and is an immanent superpower. It is a nuclear armed state with a powerful military which recently forced China to back off in the Doklam scuffle. True, India’s current BJP government is a disaster, since Modi is a Hindu bigot and further made the blunder of demonetizing. However, I’m confident the present BJP government won’t last beyond the next general election, it was rejected in Punjab, and before that in Bihar during State elections. The entire Asia-Pacific region is rising fast and is booming economically. Look at Malaysia in particular. Even Pakistan is experiencing steady GDP growth and has good prospects due to the CPEC project being coordinated with China. Meanwhile, the countries which are declining the fastest are European, like bankrupt Greece and Russia, countries experiencing labor shortage, social problems, an aging population without enough young people to fill the jobs let alone any potential for growth. Europe is declining and Asia-Pacific is rising. Even African countries are experiencing economic growth like never before.




But why should I move to India just because you want me to? You think someone will seriously decide to move to another country just because some racist told him to do so on an online discussion board? Don’t be so naïve and ridiculous. We are here to stay in Canada and we will make this country in our image. Why should we surrender when we are winning?


 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada






Actually, India is rising fast and is an immanent superpower. It is a nuclear armed state with a powerful military which recently forced China to back off in the Doklam scuffle. True, India’s current BJP government is a disaster, since Modi is a Hindu bigot and further made the blunder of demonetizing. However, I’m confident the present BJP government won’t last beyond the next general election, it was rejected in Punjab, and before that in Bihar during State elections. The entire Asia-Pacific region is rising fast and is booming economically. Look at Malaysia in particular. Even Pakistan is experiencing steady GDP growth and has good prospects due to the CPEC project being coordinated with China. Meanwhile, the countries which are declining the fastest are European, like bankrupt Greece and Russia, countries experiencing labor shortage, social problems, an aging population without enough young people to fill the jobs let alone any potential for growth. Europe is declining and Asia-Pacific is rising. Even African countries are experiencing economic growth like never before.




But why should I move to India just because you want me to? You think someone will seriously decide to move to another country just because some racist told him to do so on an online discussion board? Don’t be so naïve and ridiculous. We are here to stay in Canada and we will make this country in our image. Why should we surrender when we are winning?


Yes it's the best place for you, a country full of useless losers and you would fit right in. It has everything you want.

N America will always be a White Christian country, and you don't fit in. Plus we don't want losers like you here trying to make this country a loser like India.