Should Canadians pay a sugar tax on food and drinks?

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Should Canadians pay a sugar tax on food and drinks?



As health advocates push for Canada to adopt a tax on sugar, critics say such a move would unfairly target certain companies and wouldn’t necessarily spur a drop in obesity rates.

A group of Canadian dieticians is calling for the government to charge a 20 per cent tax on food and drinks with added sugar. Recent Statistic Canada reports suggest that about one in five Canadian adults are obese.

“The majority of sugar is coming from sugar-sweetened beverages. So it’s a place for us to start in terms of reducing consumption,” Kate Comeau, a dietitian and spokesperson for Dietitians of Canada, told CTV News.

The idea comes from Mexico, where over 70 per cent of adults are overweight or obese. In an attempt to curb the health crisis, the Mexican government brought in a 10 per cent tax on sugary foods in 2014.

One year later, sales of the taxed products dropped 12 per cent, according to one study. Mexico also saw a general increase in water consumption, an indicator that “is really positive in terms of preventing chronic disease,” Comeau said.

India, the U.K. and the Philippines have toyed with adopting a similar policy. The U.K. in particular has struggled with obesity, with one report suggesting that 66 per cent of men and 57 per cent of women over the age of 20 are obese.

But critics say that, while sales in Mexico dropped, there has yet to be a study that makes a definitive link between the country’s sugar tax and a drop in obesity rates.
One study found that Mexico’s tax only cut about six calories per citizen per day. (Mexico has a population of about 122 million.)

“A lot of this stuff basically makes them feel good that they’re actually doing something but it won’t help with reducing weight overall,” said Patrick Luciani, author of “XXL: Obesity and the Limits of Shame.”

Some companies say it’s unfair to blame one particular product for obesity rates, which could also be linked to inactivity levels or large portion sizes.
A few beverage companies have made efforts to cut sugar levels over the years.

“The beverage industry as a whole has also reduced the amount of calories Canadians consume by approximately 20 per cent in the last 10 years,” said Jim Goetz, president of the Canadian Beverage Association.

Consumption of high levels of sugar has been linked to diabetes, cardiovascular disease and weight-related conditions.

Source: Should Canadians pay a sugar tax on food and drinks? | CTV News
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,219
8,056
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Should Canadians pay a sugar tax on food and drinks?

As health advocates push for Canada to adopt a tax on sugar, critics say such a move would unfairly target certain companies and wouldn’t necessarily spur a drop in obesity rates.

A group of Canadian dieticians is calling for the government to charge a 20 per cent tax on food and drinks with added sugar. Recent Statistic Canada reports suggest that about one in five Canadian adults are obese......

...The idea comes from Mexico, where over 70 per cent of adults are overweight or obese. In an attempt to curb the health crisis, the Mexican government brought in a 10 per cent tax on sugary foods in 2014.

One year later, sales of the taxed products dropped 12 per cent, according to one study. Mexico also saw a general increase in water consumption, an indicator that “is really positive in terms of preventing chronic disease,” Comeau said....

Mexico does 10%, so Canada should do 20%???

An increase in water consumption (bottled I hope) in Mexico
to prevent chronic disease? Like Montezuma's revenge?

I guess it's not chronic, but it's no fun.
 

Scooby

Electoral Member
Mar 22, 2012
403
0
16
Alberta
Absolutely, there should be a high punitive tax on unhealthy foods and drinks. The very concept that huge food processing companies would take a hit to their bottom line should be a deciding factor in this decision is laughable. This is a health and safety issue like tobacco, or seat belts, or smoke detectors.
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
I think that is typical among most native Americans . I have heard that diabetes is prevalent among the tribes in Arizona.

Not sure why though.

A good question that deserves a truthful answer. White man gave it to them.


Native Americans and Diabetes - The Facts

This information on Native Americans and Diabetes is taken from the American Diabetes Association.

What is Diabetes?

Diabetes is a disease that affects the body's ability to produce or respond to insulin, a hormone that allows blood glucose (blood sugar) to enter the cells of the body and be used for energy. Diabetes falls into two main categories: type 1, which usually occurs during childhood or adolescence, and type 2, the most common form of the disease, usually occurring after age 45.

Diabetes is a chronic disease that has no cure.

How Does it Affect Native Americans?

Prevalence :

Prevalence of type 2 diabetes among Native Americans in the United States is 12.2% for those over 19 years of age. One tribe in Arizona has the highest rate of diabetes in the world. About 50% of the tribe between the ages of 30 and 64 have diabetes.

Today, diabetes has reached epidemic proportions among Native Americans. Complications from diabetes are major causes of death and health problems in most Native American populations.

Of equal concern is the fact that type 2, or adult-onset diabetes, is increasingly being discovered in Native American youth.

Diabetes Rapidly Increasing Among Native Americans, Alaskans

Reported in the December, 2000 issue of Diabetes Care: Diabetes has been growing in prevalence among Native Americans and Alaskan Natives,according to a recent study by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The study found a nearly 30 percent increase in diabetes diagnoses among these populations between 1990 and 1997. During this time period prevalence among women was higher than among men, but the rate of increase was higher among men than women (37 percent v. 25 percent). The increase in prevalence was highest in Alaska, where it rose 76 percent during the 1990s, and lowest in the Northern Plains region of the United States, where it rose by 16 percent during this time period.

Obesity and Native Americans:

According to the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the "thrifty gene" theory proposes that African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Asian Americans and Native Americans inherited a gene from their ancestors which enabled them to use food more efficiently during "feast and famine" cycles. Today there are fewer such cycles; this causes certain populations to be more susceptible to obesity and to developing type 2 diabetes.

Native Americans and Diabetic Complications:

The serious complications of diabetes are increasing in frequency among Native Americans. Of major concern are increasing rates of kidney failure, amputations and blindness.

Ten to twenty-one percent of all people with diabetes develop kidney disease. In 1995, 27,900 people initiated treatment for end stage renal disease (kidney failure) because of diabetes. Among people with diabetes, the rate of diabetic end stage renal disease is six times higher among Native Americans.

Diabetes is the most frequent cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations. The risk of a leg amputation is 15 to 40 times greater for a person with diabetes. Each year 54,000 people lose their foot or leg to diabetes. Amputation rates among Native Americans are 3-4 times higher than the general population.

Diabetic retinopathy is a term used for all abnormalities of the small blood vessels of the retina caused by diabetes, such as weakening of blood vessel walls or leakage from blood vessels. Diabetic retinopathy occurs in 18% of Pima Indians and 24.4% of Oklahoma Indians.

What is Needed?

In ideal circumstances, Native Americans with diabetes will have their disease under good control and be monitored frequently by a health care team knowledgeable in the care of diabetes.

Patient education is critical. People with diabetes can reduce their risk for complications if they are educated about their disease, learn and practice the skills necessary to better control their blood glucose levels, and receive regular checkups from their health care team.

People with diabetes, with the help of their health care providers, should set goals for better control of blood glucose levels, as close to the normal range as is possible for them. Health care team education is vital. Because people with diabetes have a multi-system chronic disease, they are best monitored and managed by highly skilled health care professionals trained with the latest information on diabetes to help ensure early detection and appropriate treatment of the serious complications of the disease. A team approach to treating and monitoring this disease serves the best interests of the patient.

Knowledge is power. Learn what you can, talk to your health care provider and use what you learn to help yourself beat this horrible disease.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
Absolutely, there should be a high punitive tax on unhealthy foods and drinks. The very concept that huge food processing companies would take a hit to their bottom line should be a deciding factor in this decision is laughable. This is a health and safety issue like tobacco, or seat belts, or smoke detectors.

There won't be a hit on any companies bottom line. It will be paid by the consumer and mean they will have less disposable income.

But its just a cash cow. Because obviously the sin taxes on alcohol and cigs have stopped drinking and smoking right?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
The short answer is Yes, the long answer is Yes. Sugar is killing us!
Make it revenue neutral, deduct it off the hydro bill.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I laugh when some fit health nut jogger gets run over by a bus or dies of a heart attack. I have a Coca-Cola especially in their honour.


Where's the sense in that? Is it going to reduce sh*tty bus drivers? Heart attacks can happen to anyone.


But hey, fast walking or walking up hill is much healthier than jogging!
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
Where's the sense in that? Is it going to reduce sh*tty bus drivers? Heart attacks can happen to anyone.

I never said it was the bus drivers fault. The jogger could have been reading his latest diet tips on his/her cellphone and ran right in front of the bus.

And yes, heart attacks happen to anyone with sugar or without.
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
The lazy and addle minded should be encouraged to consume mass quantities of sugar and empty calories.
With all the research and studies out there people should be able to come to the conclusion that too much sugar and other empty calories like white flour and processed foods are detrimental to your general well being.
If they can't figure this out by themselves then maybe they are part of the problem and should be culled.
Advertising for increased sugar and white flour consumption in countries like China and India will help to curb the surplus population problem we are now experiencing.
Plus, if your one of the smart ones, you'll put P&G, Kraft etc in your portfolio and enjoy a comfortable retirement on the backs of the lazy addle minded masses.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Absolutely, there should be a high punitive tax on unhealthy foods and drinks. The very concept that huge food processing companies would take a hit to their bottom line should be a deciding factor in this decision is laughable. This is a health and safety issue like tobacco, or seat belts, or smoke detectors.

May I respectfully point out that ALL of our foods are now unhealthy.
It is perfectly acceptable to doctor our meats with steroids, antibiotics and Heaven knows what else! It is acceptable to import dirty foods from other countries, namely China. Our fish supplies are polluted with mercury. Eggs come from chickens that never see the light of day. Vegetables and fruits are genetically altered, not at all natural.

I think only the most ignorant and poor consume those 'unhealthy' fast foods and sugary drinks without restraint. They are not likely to change their eating habits so it would only increase their poverty.

I'm afraid this would just be another tax grab and would have no signifigant beneficial result except to increase government income.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
Eggs come from chickens that never see the light of day.
The opposite is the reality. Chickens are kept in the light, they don't eat in the dark. Keeping the lights on keeps them feeding which makes them grow incredibly fast and lay more eggs
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Should Canadians pay a sugar tax on food and drinks?



As health advocates push for Canada to adopt a tax on sugar, critics say such a move would unfairly target certain companies and wouldn’t necessarily spur a drop in obesity rates.

A group of Canadian dieticians is calling for the government to charge a 20 per cent tax on food and drinks with added sugar. Recent Statistic Canada reports suggest that about one in five Canadian adults are obese.

“The majority of sugar is coming from sugar-sweetened beverages. So it’s a place for us to start in terms of reducing consumption,” Kate Comeau, a dietitian and spokesperson for Dietitians of Canada, told CTV News.

The idea comes from Mexico, where over 70 per cent of adults are overweight or obese. In an attempt to curb the health crisis, the Mexican government brought in a 10 per cent tax on sugary foods in 2014.

One year later, sales of the taxed products dropped 12 per cent, according to one study. Mexico also saw a general increase in water consumption, an indicator that “is really positive in terms of preventing chronic disease,” Comeau said.

India, the U.K. and the Philippines have toyed with adopting a similar policy. The U.K. in particular has struggled with obesity, with one report suggesting that 66 per cent of men and 57 per cent of women over the age of 20 are obese.

But critics say that, while sales in Mexico dropped, there has yet to be a study that makes a definitive link between the country’s sugar tax and a drop in obesity rates.
One study found that Mexico’s tax only cut about six calories per citizen per day. (Mexico has a population of about 122 million.)

“A lot of this stuff basically makes them feel good that they’re actually doing something but it won’t help with reducing weight overall,” said Patrick Luciani, author of “XXL: Obesity and the Limits of Shame.”

Some companies say it’s unfair to blame one particular product for obesity rates, which could also be linked to inactivity levels or large portion sizes.
A few beverage companies have made efforts to cut sugar levels over the years.

“The beverage industry as a whole has also reduced the amount of calories Canadians consume by approximately 20 per cent in the last 10 years,” said Jim Goetz, president of the Canadian Beverage Association.

Consumption of high levels of sugar has been linked to diabetes, cardiovascular disease and weight-related conditions.

Source: Should Canadians pay a sugar tax on food and drinks? | CTV News

Makes more sense than the carbon tax scam.

May I respectfully point out that ALL of our foods are now unhealthy.
It is perfectly acceptable to doctor our meats with steroids, antibiotics and Heaven knows what else! It is acceptable to import dirty foods from other countries, namely China. Our fish supplies are polluted with mercury. Eggs come from chickens that never see the light of day. Vegetables and fruits are genetically altered, not at all natural.

I think only the most ignorant and poor consume those 'unhealthy' fast foods and sugary drinks without restraint. They are not likely to change their eating habits so it would only increase their poverty.

I'm afraid this would just be another tax grab and would have no signifigant beneficial result except to increase government income.

Your food maybe. Ours doesn't.