Transgender is a Mental Disorder

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder. Dr. McHugh, the author of six books and at least 125 peer-reviewed medical articles, made his remarks in a recent commentary in the Wall Street Journal, where he explained that transgender surgery is not the solution for people who suffer a “disorder of ‘assumption’” – the notion that their maleness or femaleness is different than what nature assigned to them biologically.
He also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgendered people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people. Dr. McHugh further noted studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic of children who had expressed transgender feelings but for whom, over time, 70%-80% “spontaneously lost those feelings.”
While the Obama administration, Hollywood, and major media such as Time magazine promote transgenderism as normal, said Dr. McHugh, these “policy makers and the media are doing no favors either to the public or the transgendered by treating their confusions as a right in need of defending rather than as a mental disorder that deserves understanding, treatment and prevention.”
“This intensely felt sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder in two respects. The first is that the idea of sex misalignment is simply mistaken – it does not correspond with physical reality. The second is that it can lead to grim psychological outcomes.”
The transgendered person’s disorder, said Dr. McHugh, is in the person’s “assumption” that they are different than the physical reality of their body, their maleness or femaleness, as assigned by nature. It is a disorder similar to a “dangerously thin” person suffering anorexia who looks in the mirror and thinks they are “overweight,” said McHugh.
This assumption, that one’s gender is only in the mind regardless of anatomical reality, has led some transgendered people to push for social acceptance and affirmation of their own subjective “personal truth,” said Dr. McHugh. As a result, some states – California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts – have passed laws barring psychiatrists, “even with parental permission, from striving to restore natural gender feelings to a transgender minor,” he said.
The pro-transgender advocates do not want to know, said McHugh, that studies show between 70% and 80% of children who express transgender feelings “spontaneously lose those feelings” over time. Also, for those who had sexual reassignment surgery, most said they were “satisfied” with the operation “but their subsequent psycho-social adjustments were no better than those who didn’t have the surgery.”
“And so at Hopkins we stopped doing sex-reassignment surgery, since producing a ‘satisfied’ but still troubled patient seemed an inadequate reason for surgically amputating normal organs,” said Dr. McHugh.
The former Johns Hopkins chief of psychiatry also warned against enabling or encouraging certain subgroups of the transgendered, such as young people “susceptible to suggestion from ‘everything is normal’ sex education,” and the schools’ “diversity counselors” who, like “cult leaders,” may “encourage these young people to distance themselves from their families and offer advice on rebutting arguments against having transgender surgery.”
Dr. McHugh also reported that there are “misguided doctors” who, working with very young children who seem to imitate the opposite sex, will administer “puberty-delaying hormones to render later sex-change surgeries less onerous – even though the drugs stunt the children’s growth and risk causing sterility.”
Such action comes “close to child abuse,” said Dr. McHugh, given that close to 80% of those kids will “abandon their confusion and grow naturally into adult life if untreated ….”
“’Sex change’ is biologically impossible,” said McHugh. “People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.”


Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: Transgender is ‘Mental Disorder;' Sex Change ‘Biologically Impossible’ | CNS News
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,567
7,076
113
Washington DC
This is news?
The best part is that nobody, and I mean NOBODY, has fewer rights than a mental patient. Guantanamo detainees have more rights. You can torture mental patients at will. Call it "therapy," and it's all good. Hell, you can murder them. Call it an "unfortunate outcome," and there'll be no questions.

Look up "Natalia Gorbanevskaya."

Interesting how people who claim to love freedom and democracy are so hot to use Soviet tactics to control people who fail to conform.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
The best part is that nobody, and I mean NOBODY, has fewer rights than a mental patient. Guantanamo detainees have more rights. You can torture mental patients at will. Call it "therapy," and it's all good. Hell, you can murder them. Call it an "unfortunate outcome," and there'll be no questions.

Look up "Natalia Gorbanevskaya."

Interesting how people who claim to love freedom and democracy are so hot to use Soviet tactics to control people who fail to conform.

I absolutely agree.

My best friend, who died in 2006, spent 30 years in "treatment" of one form or another. I asked him once what kind of crazy he was.

"Well", he told me, "I was schizophrenic when that was cool, then I was manic depressive, now I guess I'm bi-polar, and I'll have the new mental disease of the week next Wednesday"

He was a smart guy.

He drank himself to death.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,567
7,076
113
Washington DC
I absolutely agree.

My best friend, who died in 2006, spent 30 years in "treatment" of one form or another. I asked him once what kind of crazy he was.

"Well", he told me, "I was schizophrenic when that was cool, then I was manic depressive, now I guess I'm bi-polar, and I'll have the new mental disease of the week next Wednesday"

He was a smart guy.

He drank himself to death.
And I salute him. At least he went out on his own terms. I'm totally serious. Your friend, for all his pain and confusion, seized control of his own life. He died a free man.

Who can ask for more?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
He also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgendered people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people.

That is a really stupid comparison...if you want to use statistics to evaluate the danger of reassignment surgery, then you campare apples to apples, that is, those transgenders who had the surgery and those who did not. That gives you an odds ratio with a meaningful evaluation of the risks.

Sheesh. One hundred and twenty-five peer reviewed articles? See this is what happens when scientists go emeritus. That statement would never pass review. But there's nothing to stop it from appearing credible in the popular press.

This same man thinks that because the response to trauma isn't always post-traumatic stress disorder, that somehow it invalidates the diagnosis. Which is utter foolishness.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,567
7,076
113
Washington DC
That is a really stupid comparison...if you want to use statistics to evaluate the danger of reassignment surgery, then you campare apples to apples, that is, those transgenders who had the surgery and those who did not. That gives you an odds ratio with a meaningful evaluation of the risks.

What's stupid is your presumption that Copy is interested in a valid comparison.

Sorry, Ton, you're a world away from stupid, but c'mon. Talking to a propagandist about legitimate argumentation? Please.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
That is a really stupid comparison...if you want to use statistics to evaluate the danger of reassignment surgery, then you campare apples to apples, that is, those transgenders who had the surgery and those who did not. That gives you an odds ratio with a meaningful evaluation of the risks.

Sheesh. One hundred and twenty-five peer reviewed articles? See this is what happens when scientists go emeritus. That statement would never pass review. But there's nothing to stop it from appearing credible in the popular press.

This same man thinks that because the response to trauma isn't always post-traumatic stress disorder, that somehow it invalidates the diagnosis. Which is utter foolishness.

Actually, no it is not.

The comparison is to the baseline of "normal" people.

Comparing it to other crazies that simply haven't had surgery would be misleading.

And I doubt such stats exist, as most transgenders that have not had surgery fly beneath the radar, so to speak.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Actually, no it is not.

The comparison is to the baseline of "normal" people.

Comparing it to other crazies that simply haven't had surgery would be misleading.

And I doubt such stats exist, as most transgenders that have not had surgery fly beneath the radar, so to speak.

You mean if a guy is transgender, it is often in his head.....:roll:
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Actually, no it is not.

The comparison is to the baseline of "normal" people.

Comparing it to other crazies that simply haven't had surgery would be misleading.

Do you understand what a population is, and how to evaluate treatment outcomes? You obviously do not.

I'll tell you why the doctors stats are misleading and the comparison is stupid. He is contending that the surgery is dangerous, and that the people who offer the surgery are promoting mental disorder. To bolster his case, he compares people who are transgenedered and have had the surgery, to people who are not transgenedered, so the surgery isn't even an option for treating.

Here, let's put in other terms which maybe you'll understand. Heart disease. If you want to establish the efficacy, or harm of a treatment, you would look to make comparisons between a similar population that only differs by treatment. Some kind of heart disease diagnosis, and then split that population into those that received the treatment and those that did not. Evaluate outcomes for both groups. Comparing the harm of a treatment to a population to which it doesn't apply is illogical.

Thus, I call it stupid. I had considered replying to Tbone to say that I'm sure you overlooked it. Glad I did not.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Do you understand what a population is, and how to evaluate treatment outcomes? You obviously do not.

I'll tell you why the doctors stats are misleading and the comparison is stupid. He is contending that the surgery is dangerous, and that the people who offer the surgery are promoting mental disorder. To bolster his case, he compares people who are transgenedered and have had the surgery, to people who are not transgenedered, so the surgery isn't even an option for treating.

Here, let's put in other terms which maybe you'll understand. Heart disease. If you want to establish the efficacy, or harm of a treatment, you would look to make comparisons between a similar population that only differs by treatment. Some kind of heart disease diagnosis, and then split that population into those that received the treatment and those that did not. Evaluate outcomes for both groups. Comparing the harm of a treatment to a population to which it doesn't apply is illogical.

Thus, I call it stupid. I had considered replying to Tbone to say that I'm sure you overlooked it. Glad I did not.

Baloney.

Even if you could pin down the population of pre-operative transgenders, the stats would be so very skewed........say if that population had a suicide rate of 50% more than those that completed the operation, the conclusion would be that the operation was an effective treatment, and THAT is BS..........as the rate of post operative suicides would STILL be 20 times the norm.

Both pre and post operative transgenders suffer from a mental disease. Engaging in surgery to support their delusions is NOT a treatment, it is abuse. Same as EST. A fad that destroys the patient.

That simple.

BTW, the John Hopkins Medical School is the second best on earth, only the Harvard Medical School is better.

Perhaps you should argue with them.