Should Canada return to Imperial Measurements.

Should Canada return to Imperial Measurements.

  • Yes : Canada should ditch the Metric System

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • No; The Metric system is the world standard

    Votes: 10 38.5%
  • USA should join the rest of the world and go Metric

    Votes: 12 46.2%

  • Total voters
    26

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,172
8,025
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Metric System came into Canada in the mid-70's and if this opportunity came up
20yrs ago, it might have wings.....but not now. Close to 40yrs later, and potentially
two generations later....leave it well alone. There's a whole generation that really
doesn't know what 70mph or 72F means anyway.

I believe the American Military has been Metric for a long time now, & the USA does
deal with the rest of the planet quite well currently as things are. Anyone in almost
any trade is bilingual (Metric & Imperial) already in Canada, so that's not an issue either.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Sure.... Why not confuse another generation?



LOL I hear ya there.. I'm having a hell of a time.. I have to convert back to Ferinheight to know what the temp is outside..

To me 7C or 3C means absolutely nothing to me... you say 96F man that's nice and hot, say 63F I weather a sweater, 43F holy crap, it's getting cold out their..
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON
The old system was confusing as the Canadian gallon was different than the American gallon. At least now we are completely different so less confusion.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON


LOL I hear ya there.. I'm having a hell of a time.. I have to convert back to Ferinheight to know what the temp is outside..

To me 7C or 3C means absolutely nothing to me... you say 96F man that's nice and hot, say 63F I weather a sweater, 43F holy crap, it's getting cold out their..

7C = 7 * 9/5 + 32 = 44.6F
3C = 3 * 9/5 + 32 = 37.4F
96F = (96 - 32) * 5/9 = 35.6C
63F = (63 - 32) * 5/9 = 17.2C
43F = (43 - 32) * 5/9 = 6.1C

Easy Peasy.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
I believe the American Military has been Metric for a long time now, & the USA does
deal with the rest of the planet quite well currently as things are. Anyone in almost
any trade is bilingual (Metric & Imperial) already in Canada, so that's not an issue either.

That is true. I also believe the US Scientific community uses the metric system as well.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
And 3.8l / US gallon.
4.6l / Canadian gallon (not that this exists anymore).
The only thing I have problem with, since we went metric in the mill over 40 years ago is lthe liters per 100 kilometers doesn't seem to mean anything to me as MPG.
0C. is cold
-17C is damn cold
-40C is pissing icicles cold
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
Well, I am in my mid 40s and am a hybrid.

I am 5'11", not whatever cm. I am 220 lbs not 100 kg.

I work in oil and gas, so I learned early on, because of oil companies operating and equipment being manufactured on both sides of the border, to convert with volumes and pressures.

Temperature to me makes more sense in Celsius: water boils and 100 and freezes at 0... Fahrenheit almost seems kind of arbitrary, although I know its not. Living in the US I am learning to convert mentally to keep things in perspective.

Speed and distances really don't make that much difference to me, as I grew up with the dual scales on speedometers, and the difference between a yard and a meter not being that substantial.

In the end, for whatever little it is worth, I voted the US should convert, because in many ways their hold out doesn't seem to have much logic aside from a comfort zone behind it.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,172
8,025
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Well, I am in my mid 40s and am a hybrid.

I am 5'11", not whatever cm. I am 220 lbs not 100 kg.

I work in oil and gas, so I learned early on, because of oil companies operating and equipment being manufactured on both sides of the border, to convert with volumes and pressures.

Temperature to me makes more sense in Celsius: water boils and 100 and freezes at 0... Fahrenheit almost seems kind of arbitrary, although I know its not. Living in the US I am learning to convert mentally to keep things in perspective.

You really are a hybrid!!! Water boils at 100F & freezes at 0c. I switch back & forth too.
Nature of our similiar ages.
 

Toro

Senate Member
No.

It was stupid and pointless to do it then. It had no practical benefit. But it would be just as dumb to do it now.

I think in both, though now that I've been in America for 15 years, I'm thinking more in Imperial.

I still understand temperature better in celcius, though I relate more to hot temperatures in fahrenheit. All cold temperatures are in celcius. I know exactly how cold -20C is, but I have no idea how cold 5F is without calculating it in my head.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
I really don't understand difficulties with metric and Imperial measures, I've been using them both for more years than I care to remember (since long before Trudeau metrified us). High school physics and chemistry was all in metric in the 1960s and the only people who had any difficulty with it were also the ones who had difficulty with the basic subject matter, there's nothing about metric itself that's particularly difficult. And with a little thought you can easily invent shortcuts to comprehension. 60 mph, for instance, which used to be almost universally the speed limit on highways, is a mile a minute, so if you see a road sign that says "Podunk 42" you know it'll take about 42 minutes to get there. On the other hand, if you're going 100 km/hr and the sign says "Podunk 67" you know it'll take about 0.67 hours to get there, round that to 0.7, times 60 minutes, = 42 minutes. You can get a quick estimate of a Fahrenheit temperature from Celsius by doubling it and adding 30, and vice versa of course, Fahrenheit to Celsius, subtract thirty and halve the result, it'll be reasonably close over most temperatures you're likely to encounter. The liters per 100 km thing is confusing not because it's metric but because it's a bad choice of units and it reverses the scale of the old miles per gallon calculation, bigger is better for the latter, smaller is better for the former. Km/liter would have made more sense to me. And if you look closely at the labels on things you'll see that a lot of conversions are soft conversions anyway. Buy a jar of pickles, it might be a liter, it might be a U.S. quart labelled as 964 grams or 959 ml or an Imperial quart labelled as 1.14 liters, depending on where it came from. The government was a little bit sneaky about the conversion too, toothpaste sizes were converted before any announcement was made, and nobody noticed.

And scientific calculations are a LOT easier to do with metric units, you won't get confused about things like the difference between a pound force and a pound mass and the introduction of units you've never heard of, called slugs, to clear it up. Which doesn't work, it just adds another unit to remember that bears no neat factor of 10 relationship to other units the way metric units do.