NDP MP Pat Martin wants your help in paying his legal bills

Should Canadians help Pat Martin with his legal bills?

  • Maybe only this once, anyone can make a mistake

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Why now he gets my money now being elected to ottawa

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10

canuck50

New Member
Nov 11, 2011
49
0
6
Beside Ron in Regina
Hi all,
I'm sorry maybe this isn't the place or the arena for such, but being relatively new I hope you will forgive me.

I was online today and what pops up on my yahoo email whats new page is this headline...
NDP MP Pat Martin wants your help in paying his legal bills
Here's the link if you are interested...
NDP MP Pat Martin wants your help in paying his legal bills | Canada Politics - Yahoo! News Canada

Now I'm no political science major, not a lawyer, HELL I DRIVE A TOW TRUCK but now if I was to make his comments how many people would be running to my side to help me pay legal bills. Lets face it ENGAGE BRAIN BEFORE OPENING MOUTH.

I mean seriously? Who does he think he is? Why should people use their hard earned money to support an idiot like this?

Just a thought on my part....
 

canuck50

New Member
Nov 11, 2011
49
0
6
Beside Ron in Regina
How much damage did Pat Martin do to RackNine's business even opening his mouth? That is the point here, sure he apologized only because the canadian communist federation made him do it.
 

canuck50

New Member
Nov 11, 2011
49
0
6
Beside Ron in Regina
The point I'm trying to make is very simple, Why is he asking canadians to pay HIS legal bills? If you would have said it and you got sued would people pay your legal bills Lonewolf? I'm guessing not
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
In principle, legal councel ought to be free for all, otherwise justice if only for the rich.

That being said, depending on the person's financial situation, should he be found guilty, it might be responsible to then expect him to pay it back.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Pat 'the mouth' Martin let his false pride control his inaction on Racknine's demand and the rest is history man. From an April thread earlier this year:



NDP MP Pat Martin offers thorough, absolute apology to robocall company RackNine over fraud allegations

OTTAWA — Outspoken New Democrat MP Pat Martin gave on Monday an unequivocal apology to RackNine Inc. and its CEO Matt Meier, thereby avoiding a $5-million defamation lawsuit.

“I wrongfully accused them of being part of conspiracy to commit electoral fraud,” Martin told reporters. “I now know that the statements I made insinuating Mr. Meier and RackNine’s participation in an electoral fraud conspiracy were wholly and unequivocally false.”

Martin made the statements on Feb 23, amidst a political firestorm raging over fraudulent automated robocalls made during the 2011 general election.

A political operative using the pseudonym “Pierre Poutine” placed robocalls through RackNine’s automated calling service, drawing national attention to the firm, which was never itself under investigated.

Martin said Monday that RackNine is not to blame for the robocall scandal.

“RackNine provides a legitimate automated call service, similar to services used by many political parties,” he said. “RackNine was merely an innocent intermediary, not a participant in, electoral fraud.”

“I apologize for any damage my statements may have caused to Mr. Meier personally or to RackNine Inc.,” he added.

Martin said that neither RackNine nor any of its employees have ever been investigated for involvement in electoral fraud in the 2011 general election or otherwise.

In early March, RackNine served Martin with legal papers, giving notice they would proceed with a $5 million defamation lawsuit unless a fulsome apology was offered in the national media.

The statement of claim said Martin, during a Feb. 23 news conference, mentioned RackNine or Meier on seven different occasions and singled out their conduct in a negative light, referring to them on several occasions as “RackNine rascals.”

After receiving notice from RackNine, Martin told Postmedia News he might have to mortgage his home to finance a court battle, since those costs would not be borne by Parliament.

Below, Martin’s apology in full:Apology on Behalf of Patrick Martin and the NDP to Mr. Matt Meier and RackNine Inc.

“On February 23, 2012, I appeared before the national media to speak in response to the important issue of “Robocalls” in the 2011 general election. At that time I expressed my personal outrage along with the outrage of the caucus of the official opposition upon learning about the serious allegations of electoral fraud.

In making my statement on February 23, 2012, I singled out a private individual, Mr. Matt Meier along with his business RackNine Inc. and I wrongfully accused them of being part of a conspiracy to commit electoral fraud. In the days following, I repeated this accusation a number of times to the media and on national television. My party, the NDP, also raised concerns about the possibility of RackNine having committed electoral fraud through postings on its website. The NDP indicated on the party website that if news reports that seemed to draw a link between the calls and RackNine were true, these activities were prohibited by the Canada Elections Act and merited investigation.

I now know that the statements I made insinuating Mr. Meier’s and RackNine’s participation in an electoral fraud conspiracy were wholly and unequivocally false. In my rush to express my personal outrage and the outrage of the NDP caucus, I jumped to conclusions I now know are unsupported by fact. I would like to take this opportunity to correct several of my errors in order to clear Mr. Meier’s personal reputation along with the business reputation of RackNine.

To my knowledge, neither Mr. Meier, nor RackNine, including any employees of RackNine, has ever been investigated for involvement in electoral fraud in the 2011 general election or otherwise.

RackNine provides a legitimate automated call service similar to services used by many political parties.

RackNine was merely an innocent intermediary not a participant in electoral fraud.

I apologize for any damage my statements may have caused to Mr. Meier personally or to RackNine, and I have been specifically authorized by the NDP to apologize on behalf of the NDP for any similar damage the publications on the NDP website may have caused.”
— NDP MP Pat Martin


NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to robocall company RackNine over fraud allegations to defuse $5M defamation lawsuit | News | National Post


From this thread: http://forums.canadiancontent.net/canadian-politics/105587-ndp-mp-pat-martin-offers.html



And then,

Robocalls: NDP MP Pat Martin to spend summer fundraising for defamation defence - thestar.com


And Captain Morgan:
Too funny.
Pat ole coulda saved himself a lot of time and money but simply keeping his pie-hole shut;




Bear's perfect response:
Or apologizing when asked to.
What a boob!
Looks good on him.



http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/107410-ndps-pat-martin-spend-summer.html
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I'm suffering from a case of Schadenfreude.

The Book of Proverbs mentions an emotion similar to that now described by the word schadenfreude: "Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the LORD see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him." (Proverbs 24:17–18, King James Version).
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Karma's a bitch?

I would chip in for one of those Hannibal Lectur masks.

 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Racknine asked for an apology, got it Pat Martin apologizes to Racknine | Stephen Taylor then sued anyhow. If you smacked someone's fender with your towtruck, paid cash for the damage then got a claim filed against you, I can well imagine towtruck driver verbiage over that.....
If I'm not mistaken.

Racknine asked for an apology, Martin said no. They filed a suit in March, and he apologized in April?

Non?