Damage to sub much worse than navy let on last year


relic
#31
I have an idea to protect the subs,give the crew Ross rifles,they were good Canadian made weapons.Just check the history,just like the subs don't like to get wet,the Ross didn't like to get dirty,lots were thrown away,and Enfields taken from dead comrads.The funny thing about that is that the soldier could be charged,what a choice,go on charge for throwing away a useless weapon,or DIE.
 
EagleSmack
+1
#32
Quote: Originally Posted by damngrumpyView Post

Getting a thumbs down from Walter is like receiving a badge of honor. The military is so
lacking in competence they are likely being trained by the RCMP.

I do not think the ground forces lack competence. They may lack funding but we saw what Canadian Sniper teams can do.

Quote:

It is a good thing they
can't fire missiles hell they can't even maneuver in their own waters without hitting bottom.
I think we should have an accounting of the damage after all we paid for them didn't we.

Kind of like buying a used car. Once you buy it... you own it.

They should have asked...

"Show me the subfacts."
 
petros
#33
The ditz put too much mustard on my Spicy Italian and totally damaged my sub.
 
captain morgan
+1
#34
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Kind of like buying a used car. Once you buy it... you own it.

They should have asked...

"Show me the subfacts."


I'm almost certain that this particular sub was owned by a little old lady from Brighton that only used it on Sundays to go to church and for groceries.
 

Similar Threads

20
Can it get any worse?
by #juan | Mar 31st, 2006
28
Royal Navy ship damage probe.
by Blackleaf | Mar 7th, 2006
81
For Bush, it's from bad to worse
by #juan | Nov 28th, 2005
no new posts