
LOL...Perhaps you would like to explain how the video (shot from a police cruiser) is spin....and yes, I agree with everything that happened in the video. A fire truck blocked a lane of traffic an an idiot cop got upset. What in the video did you disagree with?

I posted a video. If you are referring to the title of the video, I didn't write the title and the title has no relevance to the subject of the video.
That's probably a result of your frustration at being repeatedly PWNed by me.
Why does it bother you so much?

when you made claims about the Autobahn, then challenged your own claims (Which was really funny btw). But then again, you are known for lying.


I have no problem going to the DUI thread and explaining to you, how I have have not challenged my own claims that speed does not cause accidents. I'm not surprised you are confused and I can understand your need to drag other stuff into this thread when you start getting PWNed. Please, do carry on.


I have no problem going to the DUI thread and explaining to you, how I have have not challenged my own claims that speed does not cause accidents. I'm not surprised you are confused and I can understand your need to drag other stuff into this thread when you start getting PWNed. Please, do carry on.

So what you are saying is that if you enter a curve designed for 80 kmh at 130 kmh and go over the side, then speed wasn't the cause of the accident?

Ever have the wrong guy situation? I was once working at my work place when the
cops show up and take me to the station. They inform me that I am going to a town
somewhere in BC that I had never been to. I apparently, had ignored court appearances
on a paternity matter for months and they finally caught up with me. At first I was mad
as hell, partly because I didn't know anything about this and partly because no one was
listening to me. They just kept saying oh ya right you're out of excuses buddy and
you won't wiggle out of this one, etc etc.
It was becoming funny actually, as I imagined what it would be like when I arrived in
court the wrong guy with the same name and no connection to the incident. As luck
would have it a senior officer came by, one that I knew and asked what the hell I was doing
there. I told him to talk to the two clowns in there behind the glass. It wasn't long before
there was a lot of activity and people expressing how sorry they were, and did I need a ride
back to work. Yes there are jerks and there are some serious jerks but there are a lot of
good folks too.

So what you are saying is that if you enter a curve designed for 80 kmh at 130 kmh and go over the side, then speed wasn't the cause of the accident?

That's not why he was arrested.
But don't let reality get in the way of your spin. LOL.

As a person who was closely connected with highway design for 35 years, I can assure you that posted cautionary speeds on curves are decided with the capabilities of the vehicles in mind.

The highways are not built for exotic sports cars. The highways aren't built for the exceptions. Like I said, it depends on the vehicle.
As someone who was closely connected with highway design, could you describe the process for determining the advisory speed limits? Is there a model, a formula? Do they have test cars with gimble mounted gyros? A combination of factors?

The highways are not built for exotic sports cars. The highways aren't built for the exceptions. Like I said, it depends on the vehicle.
As someone who was closely connected with highway design, could you describe the process for determining the advisory speed limits? Is there a model, a formula? Do they have test cars with gimble mounted gyros? A combination of factors?

You're right, That's not why he was arrested,
When I had my training for ambulance attendant, one of the things you are taught,,you are in charge of the patient when the police let you, and you park your vehicle where they tell you to park it, since they are in charge of the safe flow of traffic around the scene. They also are responsible for the accident scene.
The fire truck was probably called in case of a fire, but since there was no visible fire, he should have stayed back until needed...
Just as in a case of fire in a vehicle we were instructed to wait until the scene was safe, even if I had fire training in the mill....things are the safest when each performs their specific duty...
A fireman should know that

You're right, That's not why he was arrested,
When I had my training for ambulance attendant, one of the things you are taught,,you are in charge of the patient when the police let you, and you park your vehicle where they tell you to park it, since they are in charge of the safe flow of traffic around the scene. They also are responsible for the accident scene.
The fire truck was probably called in case of a fire, but since there was no visible fire, he should have stayed back until needed...
Just as in a case of fire in a vehicle we were instructed to wait until the scene was safe, even if I had fire training in the mill....things are the safest when each performs their specific duty...
A fireman should know that

Firefighters are in charge of the scene. The police officer in the video had to pay $18,000 dollars because he (like you) was completely wrong.
Missouri Police Officer Fined $18,000 for Arresting Firefighter on Emergency Call

One could argue that he was because the truck was being placed to protect (or help) an injured person but I'm not really interested in playing your silly word games.
Clearly you have no defense of this idiot officer so you need to make it about me.
I'm flattered that I mean so much to you. Please continue.