Re: The Christian Lie :)
Oct 7th, 2011Remember vi
You said if someone breaks a commandment they are not a Christian.
So to counter his assertion, you invoke the same fallacy?

I never said I agreed with it (because I don't). I was merely bringing it up to show that he's not the only religious person to invoke that same fallacy to defend their religious faith.
Mentalfloss gets it.

Just my two cents, but it seems to me there would be a lot less terrorist in the world when people admit that religion is BS.

A common mistake by the religious is that just because people think religion is bunk doesn't mean they are atheists. I believe in the Creator and spirituality but I think religion breeds contempt for everybody who doesn't believe their brand of belief system. In other words: separation. To me spirituality is a belief in a deity without religious dogma. It is the dogma that is dangerous not the teachings behind it.

He's insane. Surprised? Not me.
Norway mass killer deemed insane by psychiatrists - World - CBC News

Bull****.
His very actions belie that idea.
He is insane.....if he thought he was a duck, would you be blaming Mallards????

roflmao
Let it go man. Even if he was insane, it doesn't excuse the muslim-hating, medieval christianism.

Completely unlike political Islam......as Islam at its core is political, with exhortations to war, domination, extermination of unbelievers, and Jew murder, Muslim killers are expecting their reward in heaven. They are completely in line with Muslim theology. Read the Koran and the hadith.

You should probably stick to the topic instead of using this crazy man's ideology as an excuse to slander muslims.
You're starting to sound a lot like him.
Even if you considered him sane, the problem is he made a leap to political Christianity........a philosophy dead since shortly after the Middle Ages........
That has absolutely nothing to do with Christian theology....read the New Testament.
And he denies in his statement any connection to the philosophy of Christianity.......

Who is excusing it???
I think he should be hanged in the public square of Oslo.....sane or crazy. He knew it was wrong.
Even if you considered him sane, the problem is he made a leap to political Christianity........a philosophy dead since shortly after the Middle Ages........
That has absolutely nothing to do with Christian theology....read the New Testament.
And he denies in his statement any connection to the philosophy of Christianity.......
Completely unlike political Islam......as Islam at its core is political, with exhortations to war, domination, extermination of unbelievers, and Jew murder, Muslim killers are expecting their reward in heaven. They are completely in line with Muslim theology. Read the Koran and the hadith.
There has been a simple, peaceful non-political Christianity dominant in the world for hundreds of years.......while Islam spreads by the sword.
If you can't tell the difference.....well, never mind.
Atheists, in the guise of Marxists, murdered 100 million people in the twentieth century.....

It wouldn't bother me to see any/all Church Organizations pay a heavy price in money and have their door closed permanently as they really are a blight on society. That being said, I can't find any verse or passage that gave them the authority to do what they have done over the centuries right up unto today with their fear-mongering and other assorted mis-deeds that go unpunished. That being said, the ones in charge of doing such clean-ups are part of the same problem, no wonder the 'clean-up' just never seems to happen.

Hitler proclaimed himself a Catholic and Stalin was a seminarian at one time. Both claimed to be biblical adherents. I agree with you that they had no business calling themselves Christian. But then, neither did Queen Victoria or King Leopold and both killed even more people than either of these 20th century murderers while proclaiming themselves children of Christian Providence. There is no question that Marxist atheists like Mao, Pol Pot, and others committed atrocities. But this does not mean Christians or Christian professing types were not among those criminals.

Hitler proclaimed himself a Catholic and Stalin was a seminarian at one time. Both claimed to be biblical adherents. I agree with you that they had no business calling themselves Christian. But then, neither did Queen Victoria or King Leopold and both killed even more people than either of these 20th century murderers while proclaiming themselves children of Christian Providence. There is no question that Marxist atheists like Mao, Pol Pot, and others committed atrocities. But this does not mean Christians or Christian professing types were not among those criminals.

Hitler proclaimed himself a Catholic and Stalin was a seminarian at one time. Both claimed to be biblical adherents. I agree with you that they had no business calling themselves Christian. But then, neither did Queen Victoria or King Leopold and both killed even more people than either of these 20th century murderers while proclaiming themselves children of Christian Providence. There is no question that Marxist atheists like Mao, Pol Pot, and others committed atrocities. But this does not mean Christians or Christian professing types were not among those criminals.

A common mistake by the religious is that just because people think religion is bunk doesn't mean they are atheists. I believe in the Creator and spirituality but I think religion breeds contempt for everybody who doesn't believe their brand of belief system. In other words: separation. To me spirituality is a belief in a deity without religious dogma. It is the dogma that is dangerous not the teachings behind it.

Well, cliffy, you do have a problem then don't you? "It is the dogma that is dangerous, not the teachings behind it." That is a dogmatic statement if I ever heard one. The fact is, you have dogmas that you live by. Everyone does. If you had to re-think everything every morning when you got up you would never leave the house.
You just don't like the dogmas of certain organized religions. Fair enough. But dogma itself is not the problem. Perhaps you just want what C.S.Lewis described as a "tame" God. One that you can define for yourself and who doesn't interfere with your life and your particular moral values. A guilt free life perhaps for a time but if you really think about it long and hard, what's the point of believing in a God at all? That is where a lot of people have realized that agnosticism at minimum (hardly logically tenable) or atheism is probably the more realistic position to take. Perhaps that is why many just presume atheism where someone denounces religion.
But hey, the original Christians were denounced as atheists (cannibals too) by the Romans, so you are in good company.

Huh.....
Atheists, in the guise of Marxists, murdered 100 million people in the twentieth century.....
Wanna run that by me again?????