How the most important wreck since the Mary Rose could disappear within five years

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,435
1,825
113
Conservationists are concerned that one of the most important shipwrecks since Henry VIII's Mary Rose could disappear within 5 years.

The Swash Channel Wreck lies at the entrance to Dorset's Poole harbour on the English Channel coast. It sank sometime between 1600 and 1620.

Its ornate timbers - the earliest known still to exist - have been preserved by sand. That is until the changing currents and tides have moved much of the sand, leaving it exposed to bacteria and aquatic ship worms.

The ship, believed to be of a relatively high status for its period, has a rudder that has the carving of a man's head on its upper portion.

In 2004 it was designated as a Historic Wreck under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973 and so now there is pressure to preserve it before it disappears.

The ship is to feature in a new BBC documentary series called Britain's Secret Seas which starts tonight at 9pm on BBC2.

Race against the tide: How the most important shipwreck since the Mary Rose could disappear within five years

By Richard Hartley-parkinson
8th May 2011
Daily Mail

It has been under seven metres of water off the Dorset coast for the last 400 years.

But now conservationists worry that one of the most important ships since the Mary Rose might disappear within five years.

The unidentified ship, known only as the Swash Channel Wreck, was found at the entrance to Poole harbour and it lies on a flat sand and shingle seabed where it sank some time between 1600 and 1620.

Its ornate timbers - the earliest known still to exist - have been preserved by sand. That is until the changing currents and tides have moved much of the sand, leaving it exposed to bacteria and aquatic ship worms.


Daily Mail grab from BBC of Swash channel wreck: The Swash Channel Wreck, which has been on the sea bed for the last 400 years, could disappear within five years if it is left to the elements


The intricate woodwork suggests that the ship was from the German-Dutch border and belonged to someone of a high status

The ship is believed to have been of a relatively high status for the period and one of the timbers was dated as being felled some time soon after 1585.

Among its features is a 8.4 metre long rudder that has the carving of a man's head on its upper portion.

In 2004 it was designated as a Historic Wreck under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973 and so now there is pressure to preserve it before it disappears.

'The damage there has increased dramatically since we first started studying it,' David Payton, senior lecturer in marine archaeology at Bournemouth University told the Independent on Sunday. 'It's a race - you've only got a certain amount of time before it's too late and there's no point.


It is hoped that part of the wreck can be lifted and put into Poole museum while the rest of it is reburied and left in the sea


Conservationists only have a certain amount of time before it is too late and there is no point in saving the wreck

'It's been buried until now, but in the last four or five years it's become exposed.

'The longer the wreck is exposed, the more damaged it will be. If nothing were done within the next five years there'd be nothing left.'

Despite scouring hundreds of records, nothing has been found to identify the ship but it is believed it came from the German-Dutch border.

The easiest way to preserve the ship would be to rebury it, but that would create a mound in the world's busiest shipping channel so historians hope to lift and preserve some sections at Poole Museum.

The ship is to feature in Britain's Secret Seas, a BBC series that starts tonight and will uncover some of the country's underwater treasures.

dailymail.co.uk
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
They have a much bigger shipwreck now, its called the current Tory/ Liberal coalition
Government. Seriously I agree it is a fine piece of history but if they want to save it
and the sand is gone, they should bring it to the surface and store it somewhere.
But who pays for that?
 

CUBert

Time Out
Aug 15, 2010
1,259
2
38
Canada
Fascinating, thanks for the heads up on the documentary, I will definitely be watching it..
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,676
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Nothing last forever, especially a wooden ship at the bottom of the sea.

Hmmm..... sure I agree with taking certain parts that can be salvaged to the surface and putting them in a museum, but other then that, there's nothing else you can do.

If being exposed from the sand will lead to its distruction & vanish so nobody else can see it..... what's the point in burying it in the sand again to preserve it...... so nobody else can see it?

It'll eventually become exposed again and the rot will begin again..... so then you either let it rot, or bury it again for another couple of years until you have to bury it again.

Eventually it'll just rot away completely over time, so continually burying the damn thing seems pretty pointless & a waste of resources..... like a Q-tip to an axe-wound.