A mysterious image of a coiled snake has appeared in a 16th century painting of Queen Elizabeth I.
In the portrait, the Queen originally clasped the serpent in her fingers. But the serpent was eventually painted over to show a bunch of roses.
Deterioration over the years has meant that the serpent has revealed itself once more.
The gallery suggested the snake's removal may have been due to the ambiguity of the emblem.
Queen Elizabeth I was the daughter of King Henry VIII and reigned from 1558 to 1603.
Mysterious snake appears in painting of Queen Elizabeth I
04 Mar 2010
The Telegraph
The mysterious image of a coiled snake that appeared in a 16th century painting of Queen Elizabeth I Photo: PA
Artists impression of how a serpent may have looked in the painting Photo: PA
A mysterious image of a coiled snake has appeared in a 16th century painting of Queen Elizabeth I, according to the National Portrait Gallery.
The serpent was depicted being clasped in the Tudor monarch's fingers in the original version of the work - but it was painted over at the last minute and replaced with a more decorative bunch of roses.
Deterioration over time has meant the snake has revealed itself once more, with its outline now visible on the surface.
The portrait was created by an unknown artist in the 1580s or early 1590s.
The image has not been on display at the London gallery since 1921 but it will form part of an exhibition titled Concealed and Revealed: The Changing Faces of Elizabeth I, from March 13 to September 26.
A serpent was sometimes used to reflect wisdom, prudence and reasoned judgment, but the scaly creatures are also linked to notions of Satan and original sin.
The gallery suggested the snake's removal may have been due to the ambiguity of the emblem.
An artist's impression has been created of what the snake could have looked like, with infra-red technology revealing the changes in the initial design.
A statement from the gallery said: ''The snake is mainly black but has greenish blue scales and was almost certainly painted from imagination.''
The image of the monarch covers a portrait of another woman, whose identity is unknown.
X-ray photography showed a female head facing in the opposite direction and in a higher position than the queen.
The eyes and nose of the first face are visible where paint has been lost from Elizabeth's forehead.
The gallery believes the unfinished portrait was by a different painter, showing how 16th century panels were sometimes recycled by artists.
The unknown woman appears to have been wearing a French hood, fashionable in 1570-1580s, suggesting that there may have been a few years before the panel was re-used for the portrait of Elizabeth I.
telegraph.co.uk
In the portrait, the Queen originally clasped the serpent in her fingers. But the serpent was eventually painted over to show a bunch of roses.
Deterioration over the years has meant that the serpent has revealed itself once more.
The gallery suggested the snake's removal may have been due to the ambiguity of the emblem.
Queen Elizabeth I was the daughter of King Henry VIII and reigned from 1558 to 1603.
Mysterious snake appears in painting of Queen Elizabeth I
04 Mar 2010
The Telegraph
The mysterious image of a coiled snake that appeared in a 16th century painting of Queen Elizabeth I Photo: PA
Artists impression of how a serpent may have looked in the painting Photo: PA
A mysterious image of a coiled snake has appeared in a 16th century painting of Queen Elizabeth I, according to the National Portrait Gallery.
The serpent was depicted being clasped in the Tudor monarch's fingers in the original version of the work - but it was painted over at the last minute and replaced with a more decorative bunch of roses.
Deterioration over time has meant the snake has revealed itself once more, with its outline now visible on the surface.
The portrait was created by an unknown artist in the 1580s or early 1590s.
The image has not been on display at the London gallery since 1921 but it will form part of an exhibition titled Concealed and Revealed: The Changing Faces of Elizabeth I, from March 13 to September 26.
A serpent was sometimes used to reflect wisdom, prudence and reasoned judgment, but the scaly creatures are also linked to notions of Satan and original sin.
The gallery suggested the snake's removal may have been due to the ambiguity of the emblem.
An artist's impression has been created of what the snake could have looked like, with infra-red technology revealing the changes in the initial design.
A statement from the gallery said: ''The snake is mainly black but has greenish blue scales and was almost certainly painted from imagination.''
The image of the monarch covers a portrait of another woman, whose identity is unknown.
X-ray photography showed a female head facing in the opposite direction and in a higher position than the queen.
The eyes and nose of the first face are visible where paint has been lost from Elizabeth's forehead.
The gallery believes the unfinished portrait was by a different painter, showing how 16th century panels were sometimes recycled by artists.
The unknown woman appears to have been wearing a French hood, fashionable in 1570-1580s, suggesting that there may have been a few years before the panel was re-used for the portrait of Elizabeth I.
telegraph.co.uk
