Winston, we hardly knew thee

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
[FONT=times new roman,times,serif]British-Indian Holocaust[/FONT]

Churchill is our hero because of his leadership in World War 2, but his immense crimes, notably the WW2 Bengali Holocaust, the 1943-1945 Bengal Famine in which Churchill murdered 6-7 million Indians, have been deleted from history by extraordinary Anglo-American and Zionist Holocaust Denial.
In addition to his participation in British colonial war crimes in South Africa, the Sudan, Afghanistan and India as a soldier "just obeying orders", Churchill was deeply complicit as an Establishment politician, Minister and Leader in the political failures leading to World War 1; the disastrous WW2 Dardanelles campaign; the 1920s bombing of Iraqis and Kurds; political failure leading to World War 2; active promotion of Japanese entry into World War 2, pre-knowledge of the indefensibility of Singapore; pre-knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor; opposition to Indian Independence from the crippling obscenity of the British Raj; the 1943-1945 Bengal Famine; the anti-Arab anti-Semitic war-time decision to partition Palestine in favour of racist Zionist colonizers; and promotion of Hindu-Muslim antipathy with resultant Partition carnage and the present Pakistan-India nuclear standoff.
These core crimes will be outlined and documented below (for a very detailed and referenced analysis of Churchill's crimes see the revised and updated 2008 version of my 1998 book "Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History. Colonial rapacity, holocaust denial and the crisis in biological sustainability" (see: Jane Austen and ... ).
However Churchill's crimes through evil or incompetent involvement in these holocausts have been largely white-washed out of history by a huge body of Anglo-American, Zionist and Australian historians, journalists and politicians. Perhaps the most telling evidence for this entrenched UK, US and Zionist holocaust denial comes from a passage in Tariq Ali's recent book "Street Fighting". An Autobiography of the Sixties" (Verso, London, 2005).
In pages 96-98 of this "Street Fighting" book Tariq Ali describes an Oxford Union debate on a Condolence Motion occasioned by the death of Winston Churchill in 1966 and the response by a brilliant anti-Establishment, anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist socialist Richard Kirkwood who listed the following of Churchill's crimes in opposing the Motion [my added dates in square brackets]: "It was Churchill who had been the most vociferous proponent of the arme
MWC News - A Site Without Borders - - Media Lying over Churchill's Crimes
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
From 1945-49 the US and UK Planned to Bomb Russia into the Stone Age

He [Churchill] pointed out that if an atomic bomb could be dropped on the Kremlin, wiping it out, it would be a very easy problem to handle the balance of Russia, which would be without direction,”.

Unthinkable as it may seem, Churchill’s plan literally won the hearts and minds of US policy makers and military officials. Between 1945 and the USSR’s first detonation of a nuclear device in 1949, the Pentagon developed at least nine nuclear war plans targeting Soviet Russia, according to US researchers Dr. Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod. In their book “To Win a Nuclear War: the Pentagon’s Secret War Plans,” based on declassified top secret documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the researchers exposed the US military’s strategies to initiate a nuclear war with Russia.

https://canadiandimension.com/artic...-uk-planned-to-bomb-russia-into-the-stone-age
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
From 1945-49 the US and UK Planned to Bomb Russia into the Stone Age

He [Churchill] pointed out that if an atomic bomb could be dropped on the Kremlin, wiping it out, it would be a very easy problem to handle the balance of Russia, which would be without direction,”.

Unthinkable as it may seem, Churchill’s plan literally won the hearts and minds of US policy makers and military officials. Between 1945 and the USSR’s first detonation of a nuclear device in 1949, the Pentagon developed at least nine nuclear war plans targeting Soviet Russia, according to US researchers Dr. Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod. In their book “To Win a Nuclear War: the Pentagon’s Secret War Plans,” based on declassified top secret documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the researchers exposed the US military’s strategies to initiate a nuclear war with Russia.

https://canadiandimension.com/artic...-uk-planned-to-bomb-russia-into-the-stone-age

And he was quite correct.

And he would have saved a great many lives and liberated hundreds of millions of people.

And it didn't happen.

And so, is quite irrelevant.

It was the Japs who caused the Bengal Famine.

mmmmm....that's pushing it a bit.

But it certainly wasn't Churchill that caused it.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
pre-knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

And another myth states that Roosevelt had pre-knowledge of it, too; yet another states that Roosevelt planned Pearl Harbor.

It's just up up to you which myth you believe in.

And he was quite correct.

And he would have saved a great many lives and liberated hundreds of millions of people.

And it didn't happen.

And so, is quite irrelevant.



mmmmm....that's pushing it a bit.

But it certainly wasn't Churchill that caused it.

The Japanese invaded British Burma, the largest supplier of rice into neighbouring Bengal. They cut off that rice supply, thus causing the famine.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Churchill was deeply complicit as an Establishment politician, Minister and Leader in the political failures leading to World War 1; the disastrous WW2 Dardanelles campaign; the 1920s bombing of Iraqis and Kurds; political failure leading to World War 2; active promotion of Japanese entry into World War 2, pre-knowledge of the indefensibility of Singapore; pre-knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor; opposition to Indian Independence from the crippling obscenity of the British Raj; the 1943-1945 Bengal Famine; the anti-Arab anti-Semitic war-time decision to partition Palestine in favour of racist Zionist colonizers; and promotion of Hindu-Muslim antipathy with resultant Partition carnage and the present Pakistan-India nuclear standoff.
MWC News - A Site Without Borders - - Media Lying over Churchill's Crimes

Yeah, from MRW News, a site so credible they think the Dardanelles campaign was in World War Two (it was in WWI), and that Churchill was responsible for the lead up to WWII (he was out of Cabinet, and was almost alone in fighting appeasement and warning of the Nazi threat) etc etc etc

The Japanese invaded British Burma, the largest supplier of rice into neighbouring Bengal. They cut off that rice supply, thus causing the famine.

Oh I understand that, but the Japanese were not responsible for Bengali well-being, the British Raj was...........
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Oh I understand that, but the Japanese were not responsible for Bengali well-being, the British Raj was...........

It's easy to say that now, but this was WWII when Britain, unlike the US and Canada, was under direct attack and fighting for her very survival.

The British found it very difficult to feed the Bengalis after the Jap invasion of Burma. They had very little shipping to send supplies there as the Battle of the Atlantic was at its peak, with German submarine wolf packs sinking so many ships that shipping could not be spared for India. However, supplies from Australia managed to reach the region.

By August 1943 Churchill refused to release shipping to send food to India. Initially during the famine he was more concerned with the civilians of Nazi-occupied Greece (who were also suffering from a famine) compared with the Bengalis, noting that the "starvation of anyhow underfed Bengalis is less serious than that of sturdy Greeks".

Not only that, but the Government of Bengal - comprising Indians - did nothing originally to try and alleviate the famine.