Greatest Empire Ever (Greatest Empire)


Jersay
#1
Now who do you think were the greatest empires ever in the history of the world. And I must admit that there have been some pretty good ones over time.

I say first off

1. Viking Empire; it was big, and it the Vikings were the dominant people for many hundreds of years. They were the ones that destroyed the Romans weren't they?

2. British Empire

3. Roman Empire

4. Ottoman Empire

5. American Empire
 
Colpy
Avatar
#2
Sorry Jersay, the Roman Empire collapsed a few hundred years before the rise of the Vikings.

Huns, Visigoths and other barbarian tribes, mostly Germanic, did away with Rome.
 
Jersay
#3
The Viking people are believed to have started in Scandanavia connected to Germanic people

Could the Visigoths be the Vikings later on, because the Vikings are just a romantic name.
 
Colpy
Avatar
#4
The word "Viking" does not really refer to a people as such, although it has come, in common usage, to mean the Norsemen of the eighth to eleventh centuries. Actually, "viking" refered only to Norse raiders, something like "pirate" from English.

The first raids into the British Isles, which were the first steps of Norse expansion, were made in the 790s, almost 400 years after the collapse of the Roman Empire.

The Norse "vikings" did settle in Normandy in France, intermingled with the locals, and became the Normans, who conquered Britain (1066), and spread into Russia, and south to Sicily.
 
Jersay
#5
Anyone else?
 
the caracal kid
#6
My personal choice is the Hun Empire.
 
I think not
Avatar
#7
I think you should define "greatness" first. And I have no idea why you added American Empire in that mix.
 
Daz_Hockey
Avatar
#8
because my American friend, I know you guys will NEVER admit this, but freedom & Liberty are all well and good, and so is hating Colonialism, but here's where it falls down:

WHEN UR SITTING ON A BLOODY CONTINENT THAT YOU STOLE FROM ANOTHER RACE AND C-O-L-O-N-I-S-E-D IT!!!

Ahem, besides which, when the war of independence (or as we like to call it in england, "the second civil war", or "The continent that wanted to be like the channel islands" happened, and we left ya, you did'nt say "oh gosh, this isnt our land, those nasty colonials took, lets give it back", no you were worse than we EVER were, thats why the natives sided with us.

So indeed, You are a despotic, two-faced imperialist country, whatever way you cut it.

sorry just the facts
 
The Gunslinger
#9
I'm going to go with the British Empire.

1)When the British conquered India, India had well over 150 million people, Britain had about 5-10 million. How much of the worlds population lived under British rule near the end?
2) A logistical nightmare by any stretch of imagination. Keeping all those troops supplied, etc. is a feat all its own.
3) The size of it for the time. This was all done in the age of steam or earlier. These were the days before satellites, cell phones, or even normal phones.

I'm going to give a nod to China for sheer longevity though. And a second nod to the Ottomans, just a bad location and bad luck brought them down.
 
Jersay
#10
Quote:

I think you should define "greatness" first. And I have no idea why you added American Empire in that mix.

Greatness;

How long it lasted, what kind of mark it left on the world, how big it was, what kind of achievements did it complete.

Stuff like that.

And I added America because of that reason, you've got those large chunks of native land that has been colonized, Canada the same but we are not an empire.
 
I think not
Avatar
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

WHEN UR SITTING ON A BLOODY CONTINENT THAT YOU STOLE FROM ANOTHER RACE AND C-O-L-O-N-I-S-E-D IT!!!

WE stole it? WE didn't steal a thing, the Dutch STOLE it, and then you STOLE it from the Dutch, and then your ancestors (WE) took the rest of it.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

Ahem, besides which, when the war of independence (or as we like to call it in england, "the second civil war"

And you would be correct in saying so because the colonialists were traitors.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

or "The continent that wanted to be like the channel islands" happened

Never heard of that before, British humor?

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

and we left ya

Correction, you got your asses kicked out of the US.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

you did'nt say "oh gosh, this isnt our land, those nasty colonials took, lets give it back", no you were worse than we EVER were

Please dude, the Brits have slaugthered people all over the world by the millions, in the name of the MONARCHY! How nobel!

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

thats why the natives sided with us.

Poor fools, they had no idea what a backstabbing empire you were, luckily it didn't fly.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

So indeed, You are a despotic, two-faced imperialist country, whatever way you cut it.

You're entitled to say that and have your opinion, I'm sure it makes you feel better there is someone else out there worse than the Brits.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

sorry just the facts

Just your opinion.
 
Jersay
#12
Quote:

I'm going to go with the British Empire.

1)When the British conquered India, India had well over 150 million people, Britain had about 5-10 million. How much of the worlds population lived under British rule near the end?
2) A logistical nightmare by any stretch of imagination. Keeping all those troops supplied, etc. is a feat all its own.
3) The size of it for the time. This was all done in the age of steam or earlier. These were the days before satellites, cell phones, or even normal phones.

I'm going to give a nod to China for sheer longevity though. And a second nod to the Ottomans, just a bad location and bad luck brought them down.

I am not going to reject your British empire choice, I think it is a good choice because of the skill they used to conquer all these people, but

Britain was more than 10 million, at its smallest probably 20 or 30 million people.

And what about the Vikings.
 
Jersay
#13
Oh, I added the American empire anyway, just to get under the skin of our American posters.
 
I think not
Avatar
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by Jersay

Quote:

I think you should define "greatness" first. And I have no idea why you added American Empire in that mix.

Greatness;

How long it lasted, what kind of mark it left on the world, how big it was, what kind of achievements did it complete.

Stuff like that.

And I added America because of that reason, you've got those large chunks of native land that has been colonized, Canada the same but we are not an empire.

Ah ok then, as you wish, American Empire then, we have achieved much more than anyone else in the history of the world in the shortest amount of time. And if needs be, if we go down we can take everybody with us, like empires are supposed to do.
 
the caracal kid
Avatar
#15
my second choice is the Mongol Empire.

The following acomplishment of Ghengis outdoes anything the Brits did:

Genghis Khan a Prolific Lover, DNA Data Implies
--
 
The Gunslinger
#16
The Vikings were big, but I wouldn't call it an empire. If you said best raiders in history, I would have picked the Vikings. They found, the northern most point of Europe, they colonized Iceland (one of the few places on Earth to have been totally devoid of human life before they arrived), AND they discovered America centuries before Columbus was a gleam in his grandpa's eyes.
 
Daz_Hockey
Avatar
#17
1. you didnt kick our asses (what the hell is canada eh?), did you know the only time Europe has been united is when they fought, for you against us. you did none of it on ur own.

2. Washington was the traitor, begging to join us then throwing his toys out of the pram when we said no, could not tell a lie my backside.

3. You continued to colonise north american LONG after we left you, we did too, but we never claimed it as "freedom"

4. the channel islands were given to the soldiers of King William the first for taking new land .i.e. england, and because of this, they were allowed not to pay any taxes, and were answerable to only the crown, this was over 700 years before the US.

5. Oh yes, we have slaughtered countless millions, but strange, the facts about india above...if we were tht bad, they could easily kill us, and I think u'll find Canada was the first north american country to pay at least a little respect to the natives...Navanut I think.

6. Just an example but, Ghandi went and stayed in the east end of london with the poor to emphises that his people were just like a lot of ours, you had to have a certain amount of money to travel to the new world, so, compared to a lot of people in england at the time, it was indeed YOU who were the rich, so as I say, to many other countries, your little french/spanish/dutch kinda united Europe and little old USA against England + a few german mercinerys wasnt such a surprise victory after all.

These ARE facts
 
Jersay
#18
Quote:

The Vikings were big, but I wouldn't call it an empire. If you said best raiders in history, I would have picked the Vikings. They found, the northern most point of Europe, they colonized Iceland (one of the few places on Earth to have been totally devoid of human life before they arrived), AND they discovered America centuries before Columbus was a gleam in his grandpa's eyes.

No I think they were an empire, a loosely organized empire but an empire none the less. They raided, and took huge areas of Europe, some claim all the way to the mediterranian, took huge chunks out of Russia, founded Moscow, they colonized, Greenland and Iceland and parts of the American continent.
 
Alfie
#19
While you folks are trying to decide who has the biggest, can someone please pay the rent?
 
Jersay
#20
Several hundred years, how much do you think we have to pay. America and Canada might go broke.
 
The Gunslinger
#21
Daz_Hockey, America didn't colonize the continent. They pruchased Louisiana, won the Oregon territory through a peace treaty, united with Texas, and grabbed California from the Mexicans. All that land was under control of someone else, not indiginous peoples. And they didn't claim it as freedom, read up on Manifest Destiny. If it hadn't been them, it would have been somebody else.

And Britain may have been better than the United States at dealing with the natives, but the French were better than th English before the French and Indian Wars (7 Years War). The vast majority of the natives sided with the French in that litle war.
 
Daz_Hockey
Avatar
#22
Sorry anyway, I dont dislike America, or Americans, but you have to realise that most of the world doesnt see history from one point of view, I' came back a few months ago from a trip all around the USA, and I was shocked, it was almost like a cult, we question our authority here, of course so do you, but it's just different, we dont believe our historical figures were saints...no pun intended....but you are an empire
 
The Gunslinger
#23
Jersay, I believe that the Vikings did do all that, I think it just lacks the cohesion of an empire.
 
Daz_Hockey
Avatar
#24
colonise is such a vast word, they "aquired", but then we "aquired" a lot of land too, dutch east india company, a lot of the land we had was from greements, hong kong for example, but they, ok canada and the rest of the america's are sitting on land that wasnt oridginally theres, so the argument against colonialsm flys out the window
 
Jersay
#25
Quote:

Jersay, I believe that the Vikings did do all that, I think it just lacks the cohesion of an empire.

Maybe, but what about a loose empire. Because there were incidents of Norse or Vikings siding against each other, Rollo as one of them, but i stillthink they had a structure that could be classed an empire, a loose empire.
 
Daz_Hockey
#26
I reckon were forgetting Rupert Murdoch's empire as well...that's bleedin global
 
The Gunslinger
#27
Nature abhors a vacuum Daz_Hockey. The increasing immigration from Europe naturally meant to a push on the frontier, and since there were only a few people they they got caught in the tide. It may not have been right at the time, but at the time, they viewed it as good as well as necessary.
 
I think not
Avatar
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

1. you didnt kick our asses (what the hell is canada eh?), did you know the only time Europe has been united is when they fought, for you against us. you did none of it on ur own.

That's Canadas problem, not ours. And yep, you were a problem to them, like you have been with just about everybody else you decided to conquer in the name of your monarchy. And nice try, the French didn't help till we got all the way North. I know it's hard for you to digest a puny colony with pitchforks stomped the Great British Empire, but hey, there it is.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

2. Washington was the traitor, begging to join us then throwing his toys out of the pram when we said no, could not tell a lie my backside.

He was a traitor to you, he liberated us from the oppressive evil British Empire. Jolly good man I tell ya.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

3. You continued to colonise north american LONG after we left you, we did too, but we never claimed it as "freedom"

That's correct, you think we were going to let you have it? There was no "freedom" back then, it was all an acquisition expansion. And, no, you shed blood in the name of your monarchy. What do you say? Time for your own revolution?

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

4. the channel islands were given to the soldiers of King William the first for taking new land .i.e. england, and because of this, they were allowed not to pay any taxes, and were answerable to only the crown, this was over 700 years before the US.

Ah, well next time your monarchy decides to GIVE something, make sure it's actually theirs, mmk?

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

5. Oh yes, we have slaughtered countless millions, but strange, the facts about india above...if we were tht bad, they could easily kill us, and I think u'll find Canada was the first north american country to pay at least a little respect to the natives...Navanut I think.

Really? How could the Indians kick you out, with famines as a result of destructive British policies?

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

6. Just an example but, Ghandi went and stayed in the east end of london with the poor to emphises that his people were just like a lot of ours, you had to have a certain amount of money to travel to the new world, so, compared to a lot of people in england at the time, it was indeed YOU who were the rich, so as I say, to many other countries, your little french/spanish/dutch kinda united Europe and little old USA against England + a few german mercinerys wasnt such a surprise victory after all.

The US was rich? Bwahahaha! Quit while you're ahead.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

These ARE facts

Your version.
 
Alfie
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by Daz_Hockey

colonise is such a vast word, they "aquired", but then we "aquired" a lot of land too, dutch east india company, a lot of the land we had was from greements, hong kong for example, but they, ok canada and the rest of the america's are sitting on land that wasnt oridginally theres, so the argument against colonialsm flys out the window

Do you folks mind if I 'aquire' it back?
 
Jersay
#30
Quote:

Daz_Hockey, America didn't colonize the continent. They pruchased Louisiana, won the Oregon territory through a peace treaty, united with Texas, and grabbed California from the Mexicans. All that land was under control of someone else, not indiginous peoples. And they didn't claim it as freedom, read up on Manifest Destiny. If it hadn't been them, it would have been somebody else.

And Britain may have been better than the United States at dealing with the natives, but the French were better than th English before the French and Indian Wars (7 Years War). The vast majority of the natives sided with the French in that litle war.

Now Britain didn't acquire all of its land through conflict but it still considered a colonial power. So therefore, America only begins from the Mississipi River East. Every thing else is colonized territory, either through trade and war.

And Mexico and France had small populations in Louisiana and their territory so the large population was indigenous. Which resulted in colonizing wars that resulted in the natives landing on reserves.
 

Similar Threads

0
How the moustache won an empire
by Blackleaf | Dec 31st, 2008
0
Empire or Freedom?
by JBeee | Aug 30th, 2007
5
Oil and the Empire
by darkbeaver | Mar 30th, 2007
0
Kasabian - Empire
by Blackleaf | Sep 9th, 2006
7
Bush and the empire
by moghrabi | Jun 14th, 2005
no new posts