Roman man had to be 'bent double' to fit into his coffin

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Archaeologists have discovered the perfectly preserved skeleton of a Roman man who had to be squeezed into a stone coffin after blundering undertakers made it too small for him.

The feet of the dead male, found in a quarry in Dorset, had to be bent backwards for his corpse to fit inside the sarcophagus which had been made one inch too short of his 5ft 10ins body.

It would have been a costly error by the coffin-maker as sarcophagi were very expensive and only made for wealthy people.

Archaeologists discover perfectly preserved skeleton of a Roman man who had to be 'bent double' to fit into a stone coffin after blundering undertakers made it too small for him


The 25-year-old male was found in a quarry near Dorchester, Dorset

He was buried in a small cemetery about 2,000 years ago

Evidence of 11 other burials at the same site was also discovered

Site said to have been a sprawling farmstead where up to 50 people lived

By Harvey Day For Mailonline
25 September 2016

Archaeologists have discovered the perfectly preserved skeleton of a Roman man who had to be squeezed into a stone coffin after blundering undertakers made it too small for him.

The feet of the dead male, found in a quarry in Dorset, had to be bent backwards for his corpse to fit inside the sarcophagus which had been made one inch too short of his 5ft 10ins body.

It would have been a costly error by the coffin-maker as sarcophagi were very expensive and only made for wealthy people.


Archaeologists have discovered the perfectly preserved skeleton of a Roman man who had to be squeezed into a stone coffin after blundering undertakers made it too small for him

Experts believe the male was aged about 25 at the time of his death and would have been in good health.

He was buried in a small cemetery about 2,000 years ago but his is the only skeleton to have survived because the bones were so well preserved by the stone coffin.

Evidence of 11 other burials at the same site was also discovered but there is little left of the remains.

The skeleton was discovered by archaeologists working at the site of a quarry near Dorchester, Dorset.


The skeleton was discovered by archaeologists working at the site of a quarry near Dorchester, Dorset

Dr Steve Ford, director of Thames Valley Archaelogy Service, said: 'We have found 12 graves but 11 of them have gone because the ground is too acidic but one was buried in a sarchopagus and the bones were very well preserved.

'He was a man aged about 25 in relatively good health up until his death.

'In the Roman period, burial in a sarcophagus was moderately common in Italy but very unusual in Britannia, where even wooden coffins seem to have been rare.

'A stone sarcophagus was certainly a very prestigious item and only for the wealthy. Their distribution across the country is restricted.

'But the man's feet were folded underneath his legs on account of the sarcophagus being too short for the body, so someone made a bit of an error when it came to taking the measurements.'

The site was said to have been a sprawling farmstead where between 30 to 50 people lived at one time. It had lots of paddocks and enclosures for animals.

It had been used as far back at the Bronze Age - about 4,000 years ago - but the skeleton dates to the Roman period.

Andrew Liddle, divisional director of Hills Quarry Products which is behind the quarry being dug, said: 'After the skeleton is analysed by experts it will be donated, along with all of the finds from the site, to Dorchester Museum with kind permission from the landowner.'


Andrew Liddle, divisional director of Hills Quarry Products which is behind the quarry being dug, said: 'After the skeleton is analysed by experts it will be donated, along with all of the finds from the site, to Dorchester Museum (pictured) with kind permission from the landowner


 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Those incompetent bastids imagine having to be scrunched up for eternity that's bullshyt.

Being scrunched up a little bit is the least of his worries.

He's got no skin and muscles and internal organs, for a start. He doesn't have eyes, nor knob and bollocks.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
He's underweight.

It'll take a good doctor to revive the poor fellow.

We can at least clone him and make him a twin brother.

'Sorry kid, your twin brother died long, long ago, and we have no idea who your parents are. We're not even sure who your brother is either: we just found his bones and cloned you from him.'
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
We can at least clone him and make him a twin brother.

'Sorry kid, your twin brother died long, long ago, and we have no idea who your parents are. We're not even sure who your brother is either: we just found his bones and cloned you from him.'

In the future, when someone dies their family would recreate an exact replica of the deceased in hologram form, like Rimmer in Red Dwarf. Like Rimmer, this person will be exactly like the deceased - and will even have the deceased's memories - except they cannot touch solid objects and cannot be touched. For all intents and purposes, the deceased has been brought back. Hundreds of years from now most people will be doing it.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
What a cheap, niggly bunch of Roman skinflints who wouldn't spring for a full sized cadket.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I think the idea of a mistake by casket builders is quite far fetched. There's a number of more likely reasons for the percieved lack of space, in fact the deceased could have been squeezed into a much smaller casket if one had been available. The dead don't mind the folded squatting position, bones are even broken to make do with the space available.