Oldest evidence of human cremation in Britain unearthed

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,430
1,668
113
It has long been thought that Stone Age man abandoned their dead with little thought or respect.

But the discovery of cremated bone, thought to be the earliest ever identified in Britain, could re-write the history of Mesolithic, or Middle Stone Age, burial practices.

The deposit containing the bone was discovered during excavations ahead of a new pipeline in Langford, Essex and is thought to date to 5,600 BC.

The burnt material, which includes approximately just over four ounces (118g) of cremated bone, was uncovered by Oxford Archaeology.

It was placed into a pit with a diameter of about three feet (one metre) and then backfilled with soil.

Three radiocarbon dates, two from bone fragments and one from charcoal, have confirmed the remains are around 7,614 years old and fall within the the late Mesolithic, between 6,000 BC and 4,000 BC.

Nick Gilmour, who lead the excavation, said ‘We were expecting this cremation to date to the Bronze Age - we were so surprised when the first radiocarbon date came back as Mesolithic that we did two more to double-check.’

Oldest evidence of human cremation in Britain unearthed: Stone Age men placed bodies on funeral pyres 7,600 years ago


Bone from more than one human dates to the Late Mesolithic in 5,600 BC

It was recovered from a pit with charcoal remains, in Langford, Essex

Evidence suggests ancient people respected and cremated their dead

It was previously thought that nomadic people simply abandoned them

By Sarah Griffiths for MailOnline
15 April 2015
Daily Mail

It has long been thought that Stone Age man abandoned their dead with little thought or respect.

But the discovery of cremated bone, thought to be the earliest ever identified in Britain, could re-write the history of Mesolithic, or Middle Stone Age, burial practices.

The deposit containing the bone was discovered during excavations ahead of a new pipeline in Langford, Essex and is thought to date to 5,600 BC.


The discovery of cremated bone (pictured), thought to be the earliest ever identified in Britain, could re-write the history of Mesolithic, or Middle Stone Age, burial practices


The burnt material, which includes approximately just over four ounces (118g) of cremated bone, was uncovered by Oxford Archaeology.

It was placed into a pit with a diameter of about three feet (one metre) and then backfilled with soil.

Three radiocarbon dates, two from bone fragments and one from charcoal, have confirmed the remains are around 7,614 years old and fall within the the late Mesolithic, between 6,000 BC and 4,000 BC.

Nick Gilmour, who lead the excavation, said ‘We were expecting this cremation to date to the Bronze Age - we were so surprised when the first radiocarbon date came back as Mesolithic that we did two more to double-check.’


The burnt material, which includes approximately just over four ounces (118g) of cremated bone, was uncovered by Oxford Archaeology. It was placed into a pit (pictured) with a diameter of about three feet (one metre) and then backfilled with soil



Little is known about Mesolithic man's beliefs, but the pit shows that ancient people understood how to create a pyre that was hot enough at over 600 °C to completely burn a corpse and appeared to respect the dead. This image is a still from a BBC TV show called Meet the Ancestors showing what a Mesolithic hut may have looked like


Dr Louise Loe, head of burials at Oxford Archaeology, analysed the bone to find that it represents the remains of at least one adult, despite the total weight being around seven per cent of what would be expected from a complete individual.

Taken alongside evidence of a large amount of charcoal in the pit, it’s thought the material represents a deposit of some of the remains from a pyre, and not all of the cremated bone from it.

The find is significant because it sheds light on early human society in Mesolithic Britain, when people were largely nomadic hunter gatherers before the arrival of farming.

While little is known about their beliefs, the pit shows that ancient people understood how to create a pyre that was hot enough - at over 600°C - to completely burn a corpse.

It hints that people respected the dead enough to cremate them and not simply abandon them, as has been previously believed.


The deposit containing the bone was discovered during excavations ahead of a new pipeline in Langford, Essex (shown on the map) and is thought to date to 5,600 BC



Three radiocarbon dates, two from bone fragments and one from charcoal, have confirmed the remains are around 7,614 years old. Here, the bone fragments are sorted into types

Time and resources were invested in funerary practices despite a mobile hand-to-mouth existence, the experts explained.

Before the discovery, just 20 examples of human bone dating from the British Mesolithic, which spans from 10,000 to 4,000BC, were found – and none of them had been cremated.

But a group of three cremations from the period have been found in Ireland, so the ‘new’ site seems to fit into a wider European pattern of behaviour.

Three Mesolithic flints were also discovered in the pit and while none are finished tools, they are sharp enough to have been used for cutting.

More flints were found nearby, as well as a Bronze Age barrow, Early Roman site, Saxon settlement and a medieval building all where the Essex and Suffolk Water pipeline is planned.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FIND

The find is significant because it sheds light on early human society in Mesolithic Britain, when people were largely nomadic hunter gatherers before the arrival of farming.

While little is known about their beliefs, the pit shows that ancient people understood how to create a pyre that was hot enough - at over 600 °C - to completely burn a corpse.

It hints that people respected the dead enough to cremate them and not simply abandon them, as has been previously believed.

Time and resources were invested in funerary practices despite a mobile hand-to-mouth existence, the experts explained.


The find is significant because it sheds light on early human society in Mesolithic Britain, when people were largely nomadic hunter gatherers before the arrival of farming. Here, excavator Malgorzata Kwiatowska records finds


 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,430
1,668
113
ever given any thought that this particular feller could have been lunch? Any petrified corn cobs in the area?


They'll be able to tell whether it may be cannibalism or not. There'll most likely be cut marks on the bones made by a stone tool which are consistent with the act of dismemberment.

In 2009, researchers at Oxford University said that a fragment of 9,000-year-old bone found in Kents Cavern in Devon in the late 19th Century may contain hints of cannibalism.

Dr Schulting told BBC News: "The cuts are along the top of the ulna, the top of the bone of the lower arm, right at the elbow. They look like they're made by stone tools rather than metal tools."

"They're just a series of fine parallel cuts as though you're trying to dismember, to remove the lower arm."

"The person must have been already dead at this time. So you're looking at post-mortem dismemberment for some reason."

So unless any of these partially cremated bones found in Langford have such cut marks on them then the experts will not consider them to be evidence of cannibalism.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
So your theory is meat thrown on a fire burns up faster if it is one piece, but if you are eating it the it is slice and dice time? Rather than saw marks how about teeth marks?

"They're just a series of fine parallel cuts as though you're trying to dismember, to remove the lower arm."

"The person must have been already dead at this time. So you're looking at post-mortem dismemberment for some reason."

So unless any of these partially cremated bones found in Langford have such cut marks on them then the experts will not consider them to be evidence of cannibalism.
Ever take a leg off a cooked bird, not much slicing involved, grab, twist and pull.
I'm pretty sure that by the time the 2nd limb is being removed that the body is dead, be it man or beast.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
they have also found evidence of acupuncture done with bones by early man...fascinating
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I would be firing the guy as that is meant for the nerves in the flesh is it not? (hard enough to leave a mark would be the doc's condition (body) if he hit a bone with me as his client.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
I would be firing the guy as that is meant for the nerves in the flesh is it not? (hard enough to leave a mark would be the doc's condition (body) if he hit a bone with me as his client.
no, no I'm speaking here of Otzi the Iceman...ya know the one they found whole (kinda)...



he was tatooed (inked) and had tons of ailments which they could identify...he was also very old for back then especially considering all of his physical ailments...

2. He had several health issues.



Since Ötzi's discovery in an alpine glacier more than two decades ago, scientists have subjected his mummy to a full-body health check. The findings don't make pretty reading. The 40-something's list of complaints include worn joints, hardened arteries, gallstones, and a nasty growth on his little toe (perhaps caused by frostbite).



Furthermore, the Iceman's gut contained the eggs of parasitic worms, he likely had Lyme disease, and he had alarming levels of arsenic in his system (probably due to working with metal ores and copper extraction). Ötzi was also in need of a dentist—an in-depth dental examination found evidence of advanced gum disease and tooth decay. (See video: "Iceman Autopsy.")

Despite all this, and a fresh arrow wound to his shoulder, it was a sudden blow to the head that proved fatal to Ötzi.



3. He also had anatomical abnormalities.



Besides his physical ailments, the Iceman had several anatomical abnormalities. He lacked both wisdom teeth and a 12th pair of ribs. The mountain man also sported a caddish gap between his two front teeth, known as a diastema. Whether this impressed the ladies is a moot point—some researchers suspect Ötzi might have been infertile.



4. The Iceman was inked.

Ötzi's frozen mummy preserves a fine collection of Copper Age tattoos. Numbering over 50 in total, they cover him from head to foot. These weren't produced using a needle, but by making fine cuts in the skin and then rubbing in charcoal. The result was a series of lines and crosses mostly located on parts of the body that are prone to injury or pain, such as the joints and along the back. This has led some researchers to believe that the tattoos marked acupuncture points.



If so, Ötzi must have needed a lot of treatment, which, given his age and ailments, isn't so surprising. The oldest evidence for acupuncture, Ötzi's tattoos suggest that the practice was around at least 2,000 years earlier than previously thought.


5 Surprising Facts About Otzi the Iceman


Otzi / Oetzi The Iceman from the Alps pictures images tattoos archaeology




 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,430
1,668
113
Ötzi was so well-preserved by the glacier he was found in on the Austria/Italy border in 1991 they could see his tattoos on his back and legs and hands.

Ötzi's tattoos are the only known examples of real-life ancient tattoos​

All his gear was well-preserved, including his bearskin hat with a cord which ties under the chin.

Yet this is a man who died between 3359 and 3105BC.