Sorry Obama: No SJC Hearing For You!

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
^ thanks for the validation


nyuk, nyuk, nyuk

I am sorry that you are no longer capable of following discussions and debates.

"It is my view that if a Supreme Court justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not, and not name a nominee until after the November election is completed," Then Senator Joe Biden (D) Delaware.

In fact, he said that if President Bush put forward a nominee, the Judiciary Committee - his committee - should "seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until after the political campaign season is over."

I am sorry you are unable to understand this statement and position by Joe Biden.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,746
7,041
113
B.C.
I am sorry that you are no longer capable of following discussions and debates.

"It is my view that if a Supreme Court justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not, and not name a nominee until after the November election is completed," Then Senator Joe Biden (D) Delaware.

In fact, he said that if President Bush put forward a nominee, the Judiciary Committee - his committee - should "seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until after the political campaign season is over."

I am sorry you are unable to understand this statement and position by Joe Biden.
But he votes his conscience and is a patriot don't you know ?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
I am sorry you are unable to understand this statement and position by Joe Biden.


The bigger pity is that you again FAIL to understand that he did conduct those hearings and put your hero Clarence Thomas into the court. Now it is time for your new hero McConnell to follow his example.

Any real patriot would say the same.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,838
7,206
113
Washington DC
The bigger pity is that you again FAIL to understand that he did conduct those hearings and put your hero Clarence Thomas into the court. Now it is time for your new hero McConnell to follow his example.

Any real patriot would say the same.
Excellent! Throw insinuations at his patriotism.

Man, you've got the fascist playbook down pat! Must be part of your conscience.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The bigger pity is that you again FAIL to understand that he did conduct those hearings and put your hero Clarence Thomas into the court. Now it is time for your new hero McConnell to follow his example.

Any real patriot would say the same.


I think you fail to understand that the Clarence Thomas Hearing was in 1991 and he was sworn in in October of 1991... George Bush was President until 1993.


So... as Biden said in 1992...


"It is my view that if a Supreme Court justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not, and not name a nominee until after the November election is completed," Then Senator Joe Biden (D) Delaware.







There were not any SJC hearings in 1992... the last full year of the Bush Presidency.



Now do you understand? Or would you like to continue to make an azz of yourself.
 
Last edited:

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
I think you fail to understand that the Clarence Thomas Hearing was in 1991 and he was sworn in in October of 1991... George Bush was President until 1993.


So... as Biden said in 1992...


"It is my view that if a Supreme Court justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not, and not name a nominee until after the November election is completed," Then Senator Joe Biden (D) Delaware.







There were not any SJC hearings in 1992... the last full year of the Bush Presidency.



Now do you understand? Or would you like to continue to make an azz of yourself.





A five month difference - big shtt.


Using your shtt for brains illogic, Obama is going to be president until January 2017 when the new pres is inaugurated. That means Congress has at least 11 months to play with since Scalia croaked last month.

Excellent! Throw insinuations at his patriotism.

Man, you've got the fascist playbook down pat! Must be part of your conscience.




WTF are you belly aching about? I wasn't even talking to you.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
A five month difference - big shtt.


Using your shtt for brains illogic, Obama is going to be president until January 2017 when the new pres is inaugurated. That means Congress has at least 11 months to play with since Scalia croaked last month.

Eleven months to play with what? Obama hasn't even sent a nomination. Can you count? You're sounding pretty upset.

The only right thing to do is to follow then Democrat Senator Joe Biden's advice.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Eleven months to play with what? Obama hasn't even sent a nomination. Can you count? You're sounding pretty upset.

The only right thing to do is to follow then Democrat Senator Joe Biden's advice.


On the contrary you clearly are the one who is upset and projecting again.

And what's the hurry for a nominee to the court when the average time for an initial nomination and approval is only 25 days.

The Republicans should vote their consciences.



I'm with you there even though you're being Eagle's fan boy ;)
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
On the contrary you clearly are the one who is upset and projecting again.

And what's the hurry for a nominee to the court when the average time for an initial nomination and approval is only 25 days.

You're the one that somehow said they have 11 months to work on it because Scalia died last month!

Geez wtf? Talk about moving the goal posts.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Just get it done before the election. And make sure to the nominee is as librul as possible so that the right wingers will get their panties all a-twisted. ;)

GOP Senator "Of Course We Would Consider SCOTUS Nom if Obama were Republican"

Source: Talking Points Memo

During a Thursday morning radio interview, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) candidly explained that Senate Republicans would take a different approach to a Supreme Court nominee if a Republican president were in office and replacing a conservative justice.

Johnson was asked on Wisconsin radio show "Morning Mess" about Senate Republicans' refusal to consider President Obama's forthcoming nomination to the Supreme Court. The host hypothesized that things would be different if Mitt Romney were in the White House.


"It’s a different situation," Johnson said. "Generally, and this is the way it works out politically, if you’re replacing — if a conservative president’s replacing a conservative justice, there’s a little more accommodation to it."

"But when you’re talking about a conservative justice now being replaced by a liberal president who would literally flip the court — you know, let’s face it, I don’t think anybody’s under any illusion — President Obama’s nominee would flip the court from a 5-4 conservative to a 5-4 liberal controlled court," the senator continued. "And that’s the concern, is that our Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms, our First Amendment rights to free speech and religious liberty, will be threatened. And so it’s an incredibly serious moment in terms of what’s the composition of the court going to be."


Read more: GOP Senator: Of Course We'd Consider SCOTUS Nom If Obama Were Republican!
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Mitch McConnell Wakes Up To Nasty Surprise: 16 GOP Senators Defect And Will Meet With Obama’s SCOTUS Nominee





Mitch McConnell Wakes Up To Nasty Surprise: 16 GOP Senators Defect And Will Meet With Obama's SCOTUS Nominee






NBC News is reporting that some Republican senators are starting to change their “tone” about Obama’s Supreme Count nominee, Merrick Garland. In spite of the “wall of opposition” brought about by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell against any nominee President Obama puts forward, a quarter of Republican senators 16 in total – have stated that they will “meet” with Garland about his nomination.


Progress? Perhaps, but only slightly. The fact remains that a majority of Republican senators will not even meet with Garland to discuss his potential nomination. This doesn’t even include putting it to a vote. This is literally just sitting down and talking with the man about potentially filling the vacant seat left by Justice Antonin Scalia following his death. Most remain completely hell-bent on blocking anybody Obama sends forward, no matter who it is.
This opposition is in spite of the fact that, according to recent polling, 61 percent of Americans believe that Republican Senators should do their job and put Garland’s nomination to a vote. The Senators remain firmly opposed to the American people who elected them. Only 31 percent agree that the next president should appoint the new justice.


Mark Kirk, the first Republican senator who has officially met with Garland, is currently up for re-election in Illinois, a blue state. After his meeting earlier today, he told ABC News the following:
‘Obviously, I would consider voting for him. I think we should do our job’
Kirk hopes that his meeting will encourage other Republicans to “soften their position” on this issue. He has called for a “rational, adult and open-minded consideration” on Garland’s prospective nomination.
Some GOP strategists are claiming that many Republican Senators are now “softening their position” to improve their image. As NBC news notes, many want to avoid the now common perception that Republicans in Congress are “obstructionist” or “rude.” Now where would they have gotten that idea? A Gallup poll last November put the overall approval rating of Congress at 11%, only 2% above the all-time lowest on record.
Former McCain strategist Steve Schmidt claims that “Mitch McConell’s knee-jerk response after Justice Scalia’s death is a public relations debacle for the Republican Party.” He believes that the best way to defeat Obama’s nomination, if such a path were to be taken, would’ve been to “derail it slowly over time.” Mitch McConnell went wrong, apparently, by denying him outright and refusing to work with the president in any way on the nominee, right off the bat. Now they are having a “public relations debacle,” since it’s usually common for Americans not to like people who live lavishly on their tax dollars but refuse to do their jobs.
White House aides told NBC that their current nomination strategy is what they like to call a “game of inches.” Their goal is to get “a trickle of meetings” to eventually evolve into “a cascade,” which will then build pressure for Republicans to start holding hearings. From there, they are hoping to finally secure a vote. It is clear that the beginning of this process may now be underway.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
I don't understand how a group of nincompoops can just state that they won't 'do their job'. it is
the responsibility of the president to pick the nominee, and it is the responsibility of those
dim wits to also do their job, by meeting with him and fairly and respectively allow him to go
through the process of being nominated, unless there is something wrong him, and it seems from
what I have heard along the way, that he is very liked and respected by both parties.

what a bunch of children, who do they think they are, they have a job to do, 'DO IT'.

they make themselves look like idiots.