As far as I'm concerned, when it comes to people like you, North America would have been far better off in the long run if my Native ancestors had sunk every ship that landed on these shores immediately.
Should Britain and the United States merge?
- Thread starter dumpthemonarchy
- Start date
As far as I'm concerned, when it comes to people like you, North America would have been far better off in the long run if my Native ancestors had sunk every ship that landed on these shores immediately.
Now that's a more reasonable answer.
That would have been smart, but being pre-modern people, they didn't have have the means in terms of technology or knowledge to do so. They were isolated and had no idea of the bigger world of Asia, Africa and Europe, so when strange white skinned people came, they were totally surprised. Ignorance is not bliss.
Every time aboriginals say, "We want to preserve our culture." They whack another nail in their coffin.
and every time you post anything you prove once again how much of a fu cking brainless moron you are with no idea of what you are talking about.
No no, you don't understand at all. But then, you sound like someone who never learns anything. Time for the mods to do some work.
I think you post these bigoted threads to get people's goat and then get upset when you get called on it. If you are going to troll, sometimes you are going to catch sharks. Don't whine if you lose some parts in the fight.
Says here a new NAFTA, the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement is getting some interest in UK. Also it states academics in Iceland have proposed adopting the Canuck buck-no joke. It was also mentioned in Macleans mag.
Countries are looking for alternatives and we can offer something. A new European club is waycool.
NAFTA: North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement?
Countries are looking for alternatives and we can offer something. A new European club is waycool.
NAFTA: North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement?
I find it quite comic that some Indians consider themselves "North Americans" and refrain from calling themselves Canadians. Could be the joke is on them because they must use English words to define themselves. Plus, it is the same kind of North Americans used by Don Cherry and many others to describe hockey players in the NHL who are not from Europe. Many many likes.
Fact is, if you don't prove I'm wrong, then I'm right. Please cite an example so I can read an answer more than one sentence long.
Fact is, if you don't prove I'm wrong, then I'm right. Please cite an example so I can read an answer more than one sentence long.
Given that logic, if a defendent can't be proved guilty that means he is definitely innocent! (O.J. would like that)
Are you trying to make a point based solely on semantics?
UK is looking for something new as the EU looks shaky. They can still trade with the EU like Norway or Switzerland does without few issues. Both countries have their own currency still.
Britain wishes to shed Northern Ireland, but would rather keep Scotland, and the latter likes British money.
There's much more to the Anglosphere than monarchial ties. I'm not quite sure why the UK has to rid itself of its Parliament for the Anglosphere.
There is no need to give them anything, declare them sovereign nations within Canada. By doing that you also five them to all mineral, oil rights as well as anything else found on their lands. If necessary charge them some form of tax for keeping Canada's military umbrella over them. Show them how to run a country and turn them loose.
What is wrong with Indians considering them "North Americans" first, what language they use is only a language of convince today. Look at the rest of the Canadians how many when asked where you are from say for example: I'm from Alberta, Manitoba or Nova Scotia and not say just Canada. I know some of you think of yourselves as Canadians first, but far to many still think of themselves as provincials first. The First people consider themselves from what ever tribe and nation they originated from, then Canadians.
Par for the course, the highlight of all his posts.
And yet he just keeps trolling along.
Yep. Thread after thread after thread of anti-immigrant, anti-aboriginal postings laced with bigoted, racist rhetoric. But we have a problem.
Wow, there's that impeccable logic we've all come to know and love. Ranks right up there with "na na na-na nah".
Been there, done that. You ignore it. Single sentences are all you deserve.
Plus no injuns!
You think he has a point to make?
I don't even give a damn anymore. Six threads on the live forum feed this morning that contain essentially the same negative rhetoric. Over and over and over again, ignoring the responses that he doesn't like, then having the audacity to demand proof that his "argument" is wrong.
Bitterness, anger, resentment. I have no patience for it.
I'm not anti-immigrant, I'm for smarter immigrants. About 65% of 250,000 immigrants that enter Canada yearly are family class, they are having a tough time assimilating and finding employment. So all the 250,000 each year, cost $6000 to support. I think that is a poor way to spend my tax dollars. My father came from Europe in the 1950s and got $0 from the govt to become a Canadian. He thought that was an awesome deal.
Doesn't Attawaspiskat seem like the old treaty system is broken? People suffer and nothing will change. Some people are heartless. Yes, call me a bigot for putting stories here that are from the mainstream media. You are the bigot, bully, and blind supporter of the politically correct because you just don't want to hear about it. The smug are irritating. But funny. But dull.