| View Poll Results: Who will win the Next Election? | |||
| Dion |    | 20 | 52.63% |
| Harper |    | 15 | 39.47% |
| Layton |    | 1 | 2.63% |
| Duceppe |    | 2 | 5.26% |
| Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll | |||
Clever Clogs
Posts: 634 
Location: Quebec
Location: Quebec
February 7th, 2007, 10:14 PM
I don't have the faintest clue who I will vote for but whoever wins it will be a minority and that is the only way we the people can keep some resemblence of control. I sure would not like to see either the Cons or the Lib in a majority, I have had enough majority for a while. However here in Quebec we have to get through provincial elections. Here we do not have much choice either the Liberals or the seperatist party the Parti Quebecois. I sure hope the liberals win but it will be a nerve racking race.
I don't have the faintest clue who I will vote for but whoever wins it will be a minority and that is the only way we the people can keep some resemblence of control. I sure would not like to see either the Cons or the Lib in a majority, I have had enough majority for a while. However here in Quebec we have to get through provincial elections. Here we do not have much choice either the Liberals or the seperatist party the Parti Quebecois. I sure hope the liberals win but it will be a nerve racking race.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 6,651 
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
February 7th, 2007, 10:45 PM
when is the next election anyway? or when is the latest it can be called?
when is the next election anyway? or when is the latest it can be called?
Council Member
Posts: 1,202
Location: Montreal
Location: Montreal
February 7th, 2007, 11:02 PM
It would be kind of funny if the federal elections ended up overlapping the Quebec provincial elections... Maybe not that funny... things could get ugly... Imagine the PQ winning the election during a federal election campaign... The Conservatives and Liberals would suddenly start fighting over who can fight the seperatists the best...
Rumours seem to be pointing towards a Quebec election called for the 26th of Mars... If not that, probably some time in the first weeks of May...
Quoting hermanntrude
Technically, the latest it could be called would be sometime in 2010 (right?)... But with a minority government and with the state of politics in Canada you can be sure it will be much, much sooner then that... I would be very surprised if it didn't happen sometime during 2007... Harper already seems in pre-electoral mode...
when is the next election anyway? or when is the latest it can be called?
It would be kind of funny if the federal elections ended up overlapping the Quebec provincial elections... Maybe not that funny... things could get ugly... Imagine the PQ winning the election during a federal election campaign... The Conservatives and Liberals would suddenly start fighting over who can fight the seperatists the best...
Rumours seem to be pointing towards a Quebec election called for the 26th of Mars... If not that, probably some time in the first weeks of May...
Electoral Member
Posts: 107
Location: Calgary
Location: Calgary
February 7th, 2007, 11:14 PM
Quoting L Gilbert
Well said.........
Liberals don't stand for anything except whatever they interpret as public wish. Fickle would be an understatement.
Electoral Member
Posts: 107
Location: Calgary
Location: Calgary
February 7th, 2007, 11:20 PM
Lets talk you own policies Liberals.....not just what the others will (or won't) do!
Quoting westmanguy
You are right about the the clear platform that the Conservatives had and I like the way Stephen Harper stuck with his priorities. What I don't like about the Liberals campaigns are that not only do they switch their policies to "suit the tone of society" as you put it, but they also continue to just use scare tactics on the Canadian voters.
interesting your right. Conservatives always had a clear platform. Liberals ran with what they tought was the tone of the society.
Lets talk you own policies Liberals.....not just what the others will (or won't) do!
Senate Member
Posts: 5,583
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
February 8th, 2007, 01:02 AM
CHASTIZED!
They just elected a former cabinet minister in the most corrupt government in Canadian history as their leader.
Who just said those wonderful Quebec Liberals that ripped us off for 100 million should be welcomed back into the party.
And that SOB just played a very nasty political game in bringing forth a motion to force the gov't to live up to Kyoto, which he knows full well is IMPOSSIBLE without simply shipping off billions of our tax dollars to the UN and China......for NOTHING!
Chastized! au contraire.
The same old, same old.
I'd say eight to ten in the political wilderness would be appropriate.......
Quoting RomSpaceKnight
Kaff Kaff
The Liberals have been chastized. Lets get back to normal.
CHASTIZED!
They just elected a former cabinet minister in the most corrupt government in Canadian history as their leader.
Who just said those wonderful Quebec Liberals that ripped us off for 100 million should be welcomed back into the party.
And that SOB just played a very nasty political game in bringing forth a motion to force the gov't to live up to Kyoto, which he knows full well is IMPOSSIBLE without simply shipping off billions of our tax dollars to the UN and China......for NOTHING!
Chastized! au contraire.
The same old, same old.
I'd say eight to ten in the political wilderness would be appropriate.......
Les
Posts: 6,139
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
Location: 50 acres in Kootenays BC
February 8th, 2007, 01:15 AM
Even Chretien said Kyoto was crap.
Quoting Colpy
But they don't do that very often. Lemmeesee, when was the last time they did that? Oh, yeah, long time ago when Martin took over from Chretien. Like I said, not very often. The time before Chretien/Martin? Hmmmm. Trudeau/Chretien. Happens so rarely. (all sarcasm really heavily stressed and sincerely meant).
Kaff Kaff
CHASTIZED!
They just elected a former cabinet minister in the most corrupt government in Canadian history as their leader.
CHASTIZED!
They just elected a former cabinet minister in the most corrupt government in Canadian history as their leader.
Quote:
And they actually get called right "honorable".
Who just said those wonderful Quebec Liberals that ripped us off for 100 million should be welcomed back into the party.
And that SOB just played a very nasty political game in bringing forth a motion to force the gov't to live up to Kyoto, which he knows full well is IMPOSSIBLE without simply shipping off billions of our tax dollars to the UN and China......for NOTHING!
And that SOB just played a very nasty political game in bringing forth a motion to force the gov't to live up to Kyoto, which he knows full well is IMPOSSIBLE without simply shipping off billions of our tax dollars to the UN and China......for NOTHING!
Even Chretien said Kyoto was crap.
Quote:
Makem pay it back with hard labor.
Chastized! au contraire.
The same old, same old.
I'd say eight to ten in the political wilderness would be appropriate.......
The same old, same old.
I'd say eight to ten in the political wilderness would be appropriate.......
Steven Hawking's Tutor
Posts: 4,612
February 8th, 2007, 05:36 AM
Marygaspe
Don't you know.....they're all pagans......
Under the shimmering of a full moon you can watch Paul Martin and Jean Chretien burning effigies of past Conservative Prime Ministers...Drenched in the blood of native children Chretien once the minister of Indian affairs and Paul Martin who's incapable of telling the truth compare notes on which is more fun....screwing over the Canadian people or hitting out on the lam with a bunch of stolen taxpayer cash....
Marygaspe
Don't you know.....they're all pagans......
Under the shimmering of a full moon you can watch Paul Martin and Jean Chretien burning effigies of past Conservative Prime Ministers...Drenched in the blood of native children Chretien once the minister of Indian affairs and Paul Martin who's incapable of telling the truth compare notes on which is more fun....screwing over the Canadian people or hitting out on the lam with a bunch of stolen taxpayer cash....
Hawkings former plumber
Posts: 10,253
Videos: 3
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
Videos: 3
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
February 8th, 2007, 06:15 AM
The transnationals will win.
The transnationals will win.
Time Out
Posts: 1,651
February 8th, 2007, 06:09 PM
People, go into the main Canadian politics forum, and read the thread "Priceless Liberals"
... very VERY informative.
I rarely see the Liberals follow through with stuff. The Conservatives HAVE followed through with many changes they promised during elections, and have accomplished alot for 1 year. The child care, GST, accountibility act, etc. The income tax was a lost promise, BUT what about Jean Chretien's promise to abolish the GST after Mulroney... ah hem?
I think alot of these "polls" are rigged somewhat. I think generally society is satisfied with the Conservatives work so far.
People, go into the main Canadian politics forum, and read the thread "Priceless Liberals"
... very VERY informative.
I rarely see the Liberals follow through with stuff. The Conservatives HAVE followed through with many changes they promised during elections, and have accomplished alot for 1 year. The child care, GST, accountibility act, etc. The income tax was a lost promise, BUT what about Jean Chretien's promise to abolish the GST after Mulroney... ah hem?
I think alot of these "polls" are rigged somewhat. I think generally society is satisfied with the Conservatives work so far.
Time Out
Posts: 1,651
February 8th, 2007, 06:41 PM
Bloc has had a opposition before.
See the problem is, that we are not a 2-party system. We have 4 main parties. If these parties each get certain drops in the pot, it could give the Bloc a minority.
Lets see
308 seats
Bloc is in minority with 75
233 seats left
3 other big parties
233 / 3 = 77 seats.
So its "very unlikely" the Bloc would ever get in, by some miracle that they got all their seats, and the other 3 parties got under 70, and the greens picked up some.
That would be a short lived gov. Cut themselves from Canada, and leave.
Bloc has had a opposition before.
See the problem is, that we are not a 2-party system. We have 4 main parties. If these parties each get certain drops in the pot, it could give the Bloc a minority.
Lets see
308 seats
Bloc is in minority with 75
233 seats left
3 other big parties
233 / 3 = 77 seats.
So its "very unlikely" the Bloc would ever get in, by some miracle that they got all their seats, and the other 3 parties got under 70, and the greens picked up some.
That would be a short lived gov. Cut themselves from Canada, and leave.
February 8th, 2007, 06:59 PM
Right but for all of the big three to get less than 75, thats 11 seats needed between the Greens, Independants and others, doesn't seem very likely. That's also assuming they win all their seats. Being the opposition party to me I guess would be a win for them I guess, and if we get another majority that's likely to be the case. Though I'm not sure which type of Parliament best benefits the Bloc, I would think minority government is better.
Right but for all of the big three to get less than 75, thats 11 seats needed between the Greens, Independants and others, doesn't seem very likely. That's also assuming they win all their seats. Being the opposition party to me I guess would be a win for them I guess, and if we get another majority that's likely to be the case. Though I'm not sure which type of Parliament best benefits the Bloc, I would think minority government is better.
Mighty Intellect
Posts: 1,897
Location: Quebec
Location: Quebec
February 17th, 2007, 07:57 PM
I don't ever remember voting for a party, but voting against one. Last election in my county the conservative were favored so I voted for them. Just didn't want to see the bloc get it . And they didn't. Wohoo ! But to actually believe there's a party that will do whats really needs to be done is being delusional.
I don't ever remember voting for a party, but voting against one. Last election in my county the conservative were favored so I voted for them. Just didn't want to see the bloc get it . And they didn't. Wohoo ! But to actually believe there's a party that will do whats really needs to be done is being delusional.
Clever Clogs
Posts: 670
February 17th, 2007, 09:41 PM
Quoting Tonington
I still do not understand how a regional party can qualify itself to win seats in the federal government.
Just wondering, what would a Duceppe win be? With 308 seats and 75 in quebec, they could never have a majority(cringes at thought). So what then, like 100% of the Quebec seats, 90% maybe?
Time Out
Posts: 1,651
February 17th, 2007, 10:55 PM
For once, I agree with marygaspe. I personally feel a party should have to be nation-wide, and have a candidate running in each riding, to qualify to be a valid party.
Or at least a party has to have coverage in each province.
The Bloc is in it for Quebec and Quebec only. If we vote a Conservative, Liberal, or NDP MP they are in it for their riding and for the entirety of Canada.
I don't like the Bloc-Quebec only party situation.
Oops, doesn't the Bloc have a riding in New Brunswick. NB has lots of French.. I think they do have a riding or 2 in NB for Bloc.. am I wrong?
For once, I agree with marygaspe. I personally feel a party should have to be nation-wide, and have a candidate running in each riding, to qualify to be a valid party.
Or at least a party has to have coverage in each province.
The Bloc is in it for Quebec and Quebec only. If we vote a Conservative, Liberal, or NDP MP they are in it for their riding and for the entirety of Canada.
I don't like the Bloc-Quebec only party situation.
Oops, doesn't the Bloc have a riding in New Brunswick. NB has lots of French.. I think they do have a riding or 2 in NB for Bloc.. am I wrong?
Senate Member
Posts: 5,583
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
February 17th, 2007, 11:35 PM
Quoting westmanguy
Yes, you are VERY wrong...........they do not have a seat, and the Acadiens of New Brunswick would be insulted that you think they would support the Bloc Quebecois
For once, I agree with marygaspe. I personally feel a party should have to be nation-wide, and have a candidate running in each riding, to qualify to be a valid party.
Or at least a party has to have coverage in each province.
The Bloc is in it for Quebec and Quebec only. If we vote a Conservative, Liberal, or NDP MP they are in it for their riding and for the entirety of Canada.
I don't like the Bloc-Quebec only party situation.
Oops, doesn't the Bloc have a riding in New Brunswick. NB has lots of French.. I think they do have a riding or 2 in NB for Bloc.. am I wrong?
Or at least a party has to have coverage in each province.
The Bloc is in it for Quebec and Quebec only. If we vote a Conservative, Liberal, or NDP MP they are in it for their riding and for the entirety of Canada.
I don't like the Bloc-Quebec only party situation.
Oops, doesn't the Bloc have a riding in New Brunswick. NB has lots of French.. I think they do have a riding or 2 in NB for Bloc.. am I wrong?
