lol
I have an expanding Earth hypothesis, too.
There an invisible leprachaun using an invisible tube to blow into the middle of the planet.
"did not come from inside the Earth but from outer space"
That applies to every atom on earth. Some things carried mostly rocks or ice. Most matter can be solid, fluid, or gas just by a variance of the temperature.
Stardust should be made up of 'groups', an example would be the demize of the earth when the sun ceases. Most accounts say fire will be involved, our oceans would biol and the solar winds would carry that away. The water vapor would turn to ice at some distance away and stay that way until it enters another existing solar system or just a glob of matter that will one day become a solar system. By chance it may end up on a planet somewhat like earth but it would come as a blizzard of ice and nothing more. Earths rocks could take a similar path but on a slightly different time-line and trajectory so the same ice and the same rocks will never end up in the same solar system again.
Is it a 'published' work?
That seems to be a near and dear requirement for Dex.
I wonder why the history channel would promote rifting in North America, let alone promote it going the full length, the the rifting that will connect the Great Lakes to the Gulf is another spread. Course by that time the Yellowstone hot-spot will be under the Great Lakes themselves, That should be a good one.
Did you see the specific part about the river cutting through solid granite rather than follow another path of lesser resistance? The narrator also appeared to hold back a snicker at one point. lol
I can't see why you wouldn't believe water can cut through granite, yet you believe in burning bushes that talk, Noah's flood, etc. Especially after you think your god purportedly poofed itself and an entire universe out of nothing.
You do mean wear down right, I doubt you understand what I'm even referencing, what is the name of the river that flows in that 'cut'?
Poofed???? Must have been somebody else you were talking too, my God doesn't have to poof things. Humans actually come to think of Him as being slack so really, poof just doesn't seem to apply.
You seem to be talking like a scientist ...... with no data ... other than wishes
About weather patterns?? Already done.
History of the Sahara (including weather patterns)?? Already done.
--
History of the Rockies?? Already done.
--
Molten Earth is eps 3
About weather patterns?? Already done.
History of the Sahara (including weather patterns)?? Already done.
--
History of the Rockies?? Already done.
--
Molten Earth is eps 3
Are you claiming to be somehow professionally associated with those two videos, and involved in making a third one? Somewhat to my surprise, considering it was you who provided the links, they actually present good solid mainstream science and legitimate scientists. I've had time to watch them now, and they're very good, apart from a little too much hyperbole in the narration. But in no sense do they support any of your arguments in this thread, and if you think they do you haven't understood them or the implications of your arguments. They invoke, for instance, plate tectonics as a partial explanation of their theses, a theory you've pretty thoroughly dismissed in trying to argue for an expanding earth.
I was looking far into the future, the Mississippi is a fault line, since it is a river already the land has been sinking rather than being uplifted. With those two rifts North America should be getting wider over time and with the Atlantic and Pacific rifts also expanding the sea level will go down just from the Oceans getting wider. Those two American rifts could end up being dry shallow valleys.
No, I merely watched those shows. lol Specifically in the one on the Rockies do you accept the proposed theory about how the river came to flow at right angles to the natural valleys? The Rio Grand rift is a fift within 1,000 mi of what is claimed to be a subduction zone. That is an odity. Not in the program but some theories say the Great Lakes and the Gulf will share a common waterway, that also has to come from spreading that is another oddity. That was the whole of my question about the Rockies.
Do you remember seeing the expanding earth vid that covered the mood and the smooth areas that face the earth are claimed to be expansion areas. In that short vid there is a shot of the back side of the moon. That is what an area that is under compression looks like. There was no explanation for expansion on one side but not the other. The moon is not a true circle, there is a large bulge on the side that faces the earth, that bulge is the reason the moon has no rotation of it's own. If the moon slowly cooled from a molten or semi-molten state then would that not account for expansion only on the earth side of the moon?
There is nothing to cause a bulge on the far side of the moon, the only gravitational abnormality is the earth and only one side is bulging because of her gravity.