Was God using a human to reproduce appropriate reproductive conduct?


French Patriot
#1
Was God using a human to reproduce appropriate reproductive conduct?

All other known entities, except for God, use one of their own speciesto reproduce.

One would think that an almighty God could find his own woman andreproduce purely instead of fathering a half breed hybrid and act as a deadbeatdad and take off without doing his duty as a father.

Archeological evidence show that he had a wife, Asherah, and one mustwonder what she thought of God was using inappropriate reproductive methods andcoveting another manís woman, Mary, andbreaking his own commandment.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42154769/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-god-have-wife-scholar-says-he-did/ (external - login to view)

Any other time that a human would do as God did we would brand hischild a bastard and have a few choice labels for the father who abandoned himas well Christians would brand him a sinner yet we praise God for the samesin Showing that Christians have a double standard of morality and are whatsome would call hypocrites



In Jesuss case we somehow respectJesus the chimera half breed even though he was a product of inappropriatereproduction Some would also call it bestiality if they see God as one speciesand mankind as another



We see God coveting, we see him using another manís wife, and we see God abandoning the child he laterwill use as a ransom and condemn to death for sins that would include his own.

If God cannot reproduce anything other than a chimera half breed thenthat shows that he cannot be omnipotent or all powerful as Christians believehim to be.

Was God using humans to reproduce appropriate reproductive conduct?

Regards
DL
 
Most helpful post: The members here have rated this post as best reply.
petros
#2
Go ___ yourself!
 
L Gilbert
+1
#3
Always moanin and groanin about "God". You must be a joy for your wife, mother, bf, or gf to live with. Or are you single?
 
French Patriot
#4
What's the matter gentlemen.

A Few Good Man quotYou Can39t Handle the Truthquot - YouTube



Regards
DL
 
petros
+5
#5  Top Rated Post
When you find what you're looking for in Religion, let us know. Until then, Merry Christmas.
 
Ron in Regina
+4
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Go ___ yourself!


Help? Go help yourself?
 
SLM
+2
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

Help? Go help yourself?

That's the beauty of the fill in the blank, can be almost anything!
 
darkbeaver
#8
God, the real one, by definition is allowed any fracking thing she wants and there's naught anybody can do about it. You're assuming God is male when logic dictates she's every bend imaginable and then some.
 
damngrumpy
+3
#9
Every time I see the title come up I think "Oh God" so there must be one.
At any rate, there is one thing to explore some questions but the only ones
that seem to come up are ones that someone has a preconceived idea
about.
There are all kinds of things that don't add up in most religious books in any
religion that is because they were never meant to be literal, they are stories
that bring a message of some kind and the reason that was done way
most people were not literate during those times. Symbolism is a powerful
thing it also has many interpretations.
 
JLM
+2
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Go ___ yourself!

I think he is already ___ed!-
 
SLM
+2
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

I think he is already ___ed!-

Helped???
 
petros
#12
He helped himself to a handful of something.
 
JLM
+1
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

Helped???

Well, of course.-
 
French Patriot
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

God, the real one, by definition is allowed any fracking thing she wants and there's naught anybody can do about it. You're assuming God is male when logic dictates she's every bend imaginable and then some.

Groove Coverage - God is a girl - YouTube



Gnostic Christians like me believe that God is in all of us so my belief is as the ancients thought. God is androgynous. All the natures out here, male, female, aphorodites, gay and all the others are covered that way.

Regards
DL

Quote: Originally Posted by damngrumpyView Post

Every time I see the title come up I think "Oh God" so there must be one.
At any rate, there is one thing to explore some questions but the only ones
that seem to come up are ones that someone has a preconceived idea
about.
There are all kinds of things that don't add up in most religious books in any
religion that is because they were never meant to be literal, they are stories
that bring a message of some kind and the reason that was done way
most people were not literate during those times. Symbolism is a powerful
thing it also has many interpretations.

I agree and that is why I do what I do.
My enemy is not the myths of God, it is those who have found one in a book and use that book for evil.

It is my view that all literalists and fundamentals hurt all of us whoare moral religionists as well as those who do not believe. They all hurt theirparent religions and everyone else who has a belief or not. They make us allinto laughing stocks and should rethink their position. There is a Godhead butnot the God of talking animals, genocidal floods and retribution. Beliefs infantasy, miracles and magic are evil.

They also do much harm to their own



African witches and Jesus

Jesus Camp 1of 9


Promoting death to Gays


For evil to grow my friends all good people need do is nothing


Fight them when you can. It is your duty to our fellow man.

Regards
DL
 
L Gilbert
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by French PatriotView Post

What's the matter gentlemen.

Regards
DL

Truth is fine. Facts are better. Either way, it's starting to sound to me as if you're protesting too much. Besides, I doubt very much anyone is going to change their views because of your posts.
 
French Patriot
#16

Open Your Mind - YouTube



Regards
DL
 
JLM
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Truth is fine. Facts are better. Either way, it's starting to sound to me as if you're protesting too much. Besides, I doubt very much anyone is going to change their views because of your posts.

You mean it's something someone would even have a view on?
 
L Gilbert
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

You mean it's something someone would even have a view on?

lol Sure.

Um, FP, gawds are transgendered hermaphrodites.
 
Johnnny
#19
People still talk about this kind of thing? Theology is still a thing?
 
French Patriot
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

lol Sure.

Um, FP, gawds are transgendered hermaphrodites.

Gawds by luck of the draw. Sweet.

Regards
DL

Quote: Originally Posted by JohnnnyView Post

People still talk about this kind of thing? Theology is still a thing?

Yep. A guessing game.

Regards
DL
 
Mowich
#21
"Was God using a human to reproduce appropriate reproductive conduct?"

Was he what? Sorry but your question is far from clear. If God is reproducing something, what the heck happened to the original? Oh, and what exactly was it, if he is using a human this time?
 
French Patriot
#22
Read the O P and answer or just go away instead of wasting both our time..

Regards
DL
 
petros
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by French PatriotView Post

Read the O P and answer or just go away instead of wasting both our time..

Regards
DL

Wasting time? She is correct in her query.
 
DaSleeper
#24
I only wasted my time in reading the last page of this thread, since I had to click on it to mark it read, and get rid of it.
 

Similar Threads

1
3
Reproductive Technologies Conference
by Kreskin | Apr 20th, 2007
17
Ethics and human conduct.
by Socrates the Greek | Aug 22nd, 2006
no new posts