The Liberal Golden Handshake..

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
72
Ottawa ,Canada
[SIZE=+3]S[/SIZE]ixty-seven MPs were either defeated or resigned voluntarily http://www.taxpayer.com/pdf/MP_Pensions_2006.pdf prior to the January 23rd contest. But their relationship with taxpayers is far from over.

[SIZE=+3]F[/SIZE]orty-seven of these former members go straight to GO and begin collection a pension. Thirty-five hit the lottery at FREE PARKING receiving a severance payout. Fifteen lucky members manage to land on both spots.

[SIZE=+3]S[/SIZE]everance totals come to just shy of $2.7-million while first year pension benefits total a cool $3.4-million. Indexed to age 75, these 46 former politicians can expect to accumulate — wait for it — $77.5-million in pension benefits. I'm sure they're grateful. After all, taxpayers contribute over $4 for every $1 MPs put into their pension kitty.

Severance
[SIZE=+3]I[/SIZE]magine taking a job, working for 18 months, deciding it's not for you and resigning. But wait - your employer hands you $72,150 in severance before you head out the door. Not realistic? In Ottawa it is. Despite voluntarily stepping aside, Canadian taxpayers will pay two former Bloc MPs $144,300 for their 18 months in parliamentary service dedicated to breaking up the country.

[SIZE=+3]A[/SIZE]ll former MPs are entitled to 50% of their pay in severance whether they are defeated or leave their positions voluntarily. Severance payouts range from a low of $72,150 to a high of $106,750.

Softening the Blow
[SIZE=+3]D[/SIZE]eparting MPs also receive a $15,000 — non-receiptable and no-taxable "allowance" that can be used to cover expenses that may result from any "clear throat— "outstanding constituency business". Also, all MPs who leave parliament have the option of retaining their supplementary health and life insurance benefits.

Pension
[SIZE=+3]MP[/SIZE] compensation reform in 2000 was a double-edged sword. The then Lumley Commission accepted a CTF recommendation for MPs to stop exempting one-third of their incomes from federal and provincial income tax. However, this meant their pension benefits would now be calculated on a best five year average’ with a base income of $131,000 instead of $69,000. MP's can earn up to a maximum of 75% of their total MP indemnity in annual pension income and begin collecting at the ripe age of 55.

[SIZE=+3]T[/SIZE]oday, base MP pay is up to $144,300. Add in indexation and additional tops ups for extra duties such as cabinet and your CTF calculates five former MPs (Don Boudria, Ethel Blondin-Andrew, Paddy Torsney, Stephane Bergeron and Tony Valeri) can each expect to collect over $3-million in benefits to age 75. Five former MPs fall into the $2-million club while 27 "paupers by comparison" will collect well over one million dollars.

Reforming compensation
[SIZE=+3]I[/SIZE]f the new Conservative government is serious about cleaning up Ottawa and the culture of entitlement, they might start by reforming MP severance and pension provisions that are completely removed from the reality of the taxpayers that pay for them. CTF campaigns in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Ontario successfully reformed politicians’ pensions to a sensible matching-contribution (dollar-for-dollar) RRSP-type plan. It's time Ottawa followed suit.

 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
These rules are uniform between members of all federal parties, not just the Liberal Party of Canada.

And you know what, I actually don't think it's that outrageous. We should be trying to attract the very best talent possible to serve in the Honourable the Senate of Canada, and the House of Commons. Particularly in relation to the elected Lower House, these members risk considerable personal resources, and often higher-paying jobs, in order to serve as a part of the Parliament of Canada.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
These rules are uniform between members of all federal parties, not just the Liberal Party of Canada.

And you know what, I actually don't think it's that outrageous. We should be trying to attract the very best talent possible to serve in the Honourable the Senate of Canada, and the House of Commons. Particularly in relation to the elected Lower House, these members risk considerable personal resources, and often higher-paying jobs, in order to serve as a part of the Parliament of Canada.
That would be nice if it were true but judging by the caliber of people who have occupied the house for several decades, it appears that in the real world we get the bottom of the barrel with few exceptions, present government in particular.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
Avro;

Avro

It seams you never have anything else to give .

I save it for rats like you.

Why not mention that back in the Reform days how Pweston (Elmer Fudd) Manning and the other public servants in his party ranted and raved about the exceses of the MP pension plan so they opted out......but....when they thought no one was looking they all opted back in including that lesbo cow Debra Grey.......heck...many of them are still at the public trough today.

Stick that in your hat ya right wing kook.:lol:
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
I save it for rats like you.

Why not mention that back in the Reform days how Pweston (Elmer Fudd) Manning and the other public servants in his party ranted and raved about the exceses of the MP pension plan so they opted out......but....when they thought no one was looking they all opted back in including that lesbo cow Debra Grey.......heck...many of them are still at the public trough today.

Stick that in your hat ya right wing kook.:lol:
But... but... China is communist.8O