Tory G8 abortion stance

petros
#571
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

On a side issue where is Old Yukon Jack these days???????????

Hopefully rehab or a an exorcism or both.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#572
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

A baby is very much human. Were you human when you were a baby?

Is he one now?
 
petros
#573
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Is he one now?

A baby or a human?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#574
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

And you liberals are always trying to push your views on everyone else. Isn't that a coincidence?

It's called hypocrisy
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#575
Quote: Originally Posted by SirJosephPorterView Post

'Kill' is a matter of opinion. I don't think abortion kills a human being. Nobody can prove that it does.

It does after viability. And some say even from about 10 or 12 weeks when the embryo looks like a primate.
You should quit getting your "facts" from Reader's Digest LITBM and the New Yorker cartoons.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#576
Quote: Originally Posted by SirJosephPorterView Post

I have raised the same issue before. If pro lifers are so concerned about the fetus (which I don’t think they are, to them, banning abortion is just another way of oppressing women), they should demand that every miscarriage be thoroughly investigated to see if women, doctor, nursing staff etc. was in any way responsible and charges should be filed against those who were responsible.

Actually, BUMBLE bee, there are real people who actually care about life in whatever form it is in. Apparently the only one you care about is yours. As wifey says, that's very sad.

Quote:

They should demand that miscarried fetus should be given proper funeral, burial service, with a proper casket and everything. Are they demanding that such a law be passed? No. Or forget about the law, do pro lifers do this voluntarily for any miscarriage pro life women may have? Do they take the miscarried fetus to a funeral home? Again, no.

Why would they unless they'd already had named it? Some don't even want to know what gender their child is until they see him/her.
Strawman.

Quote:

Nowhere is the pro life hypocrisy so evidence as in the issue of miscarriage.

 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#577
Quote: Originally Posted by SirJosephPorterView Post

Quite so. If the law did not penalize anybody for miscarriage (when abortion was illegal), then the law was an ass. Fetus was treated as a human being when it was aborted, but not as one when it was miscarried. It was an unjust, hypocritical law, and Supreme Court was well advised to scrap it.

Unf'nbelievable. Do you ever listen to yourself? THINK;

abortion = In medicine, an abortion is the premature exit of the products of conception (the fetus, fetal membranes, and placenta) from the uterus. It is the loss of a pregnancy and does not refer to why that pregnancy was lost.

Miscarriage = Inadvertent loss of a pregnancy before the fetus is viable. A considerable proportion of pregnancies end in a --.

I bolded the key word there to give you a clue.

You can't see a difference?
Last edited by Ron in Regina; May 29th, 2010 at 09:48 AM..
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#578
Quote: Originally Posted by SirJosephPorterView Post

It is not OK to kill, abortion does not kill any human being.

rofl If a human has sex with another human and gets pregnant, they produce the beginnings of another, genetically separate human; not cape buffaloes, not platypuses, etc. So you are saying that human zygotes, embryos etc. are dead? How can you kill dead things?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#579
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Actually, BUMBLE bee, there are real people who actually care about life in whatever form it is in. Apparently the only one you care about is yours. As wifey says, that's very sad.

Why would they unless they'd already had named it? Some don't even want to know what gender their child is until they see him/her.
Strawman.

I think Gerry hit the nail on the head when he (tongue in cheek) noted that the convenience of the woman trumps everything else...............
 
TenPenny
#580
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Unf'nbelievable. Do you ever listen to yourself? THINK, if you can;

abortion = In medicine, an abortion is the premature exit of the products of conception (the fetus, fetal membranes, and placenta) from the uterus. It is the loss of a pregnancy and does not refer to why that pregnancy was lost.

Miscarriage = Inadvertent loss of a pregnancy before the fetus is viable. A considerable proportion of pregnancies end in a --.

I bolded the key word there to give you a clue.

You can't see a difference?

As AnnaG always says to me: where did you get that definition from?
 
petros
Avatar
#581
All I can say is the excuses given for abortion parallel stupid excuses for rape.

I was drunk.

I couldn't control myself.

I forgot it was illegal.

She was too hot.

She wanted it.

the all time number one stupid excuse to rape or kill .... "My pills weren't working."
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#582
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

rofl. So you are saying that zygotes, embryos etc. are dead? How can you kill dead things?

Careful Les, you are going to get the "ignore" switch flicked on you..........
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#583
Quote: Originally Posted by SirJosephPorterView Post

'Kill' is a matter of opinion. I don't think abortion kills a human being. Nobody can prove that it does.

Then quit thinking. It seems to make you wrong a lot.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#584
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

The fetus is a human being but is not a legal person.
You've really got to learn that once and for all. But that is irrelevant when it comes to legal OPINIONS and reality. Reality says a baby lost it's life not a human being or a legal person buut a wee little defenseless baby.

Pretty much.
Sorting out SJP's confusion is a toughie, isn't it?
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#585
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

They start as goats?

Actually, they are undoubtedly primates after 10 or 12 weeks.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#586
Fetus at 11 weeks:


Fetus at 18 weeks:


Fetus at 25 weeks:

 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#587
ooops I slipped.
Last edited by L Gilbert; May 29th, 2010 at 09:27 AM..
 
Kreskin
Avatar
#588
Les, lets use the miscarriage topic and relate it to the right to life argument. Approximately 1 in 300-400 amnio procedures result in miscarriage of viable pregnancies (or perhaps 1 in 200 with a CVS procedure). Would our society allow for a doctor to perform a routine regular examination of a delivered baby whereby by the examination procedure resulted in death of every 1 in 300-400? Of course not. If a fetus had the same rights as any delivered human then they would require protection from more than just abortion. Everything about prenatal care would need to change. If not, it's an admission that there is in fact a big difference between the rights of the born and the unborn.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#589
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

As AnnaG always says to me: where did you get that definition from?

Uh, click the blue word.
Last edited by Ron in Regina; May 29th, 2010 at 09:34 AM..
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#590
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Fetus at 11 weeks:


Fetus at 18 weeks:


Fetus at 25 weeks:


Looks pretty human to me. I think his nibs has got about 45 years of catching up to do.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#591
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Careful Les, you are going to get the "ignore" switch flicked on you..........

I think the poor fool did that a long time ago. I'm just having fun at his expense, where he can't see. Maybe one day he'll turn around and see me rofllmao at him.
Last edited by L Gilbert; May 29th, 2010 at 09:34 AM..
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#592
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

Les, lets use the miscarriage topic and relate it to the right to life argument. Approximately 1 in 300-400 amnio procedures result in miscarriage of viable pregnancies (or perhaps 1 in 200 with a CVS procedure). Would our society allow for a doctor to perform a routine regular examination of a delivered baby whereby by the examination procedure resulted in death of every 1 in 300-400? Of course not. If a fetus had the same rights as any delivered human then they would require protection from more than just abortion. Everything about prenatal care would need to change. If not, it's an admission that there is in fact a big difference between the rights of the born and the unborn.

Legally, I agree. The legal system thinks as SJP does, that a baby isn't a baby until it is physically free from the mother. Scientifically and logically (deductive logic that is), though, there is life from day 1. As most humans prefer sexual relations with other humans, the life inside humans is human, but up until viability it is not yet a developed human life.
BTW, I like what wifey said: an apple isn't an apple till it leaves the tree. lol
 
karrie
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#593
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

Humanity ought to grant a fetus the rights of common sense.

Common sense would dictate to me that punching a woman's pregnancy to death means you've done something beyond just punch her, and you know it. It would dictate that you are, indeed, one of the mentally unbalanced, the cruel, the unusual, that we do not want walking amongst the general population, and ought to be sentenced in that light. I don't care how law classifies it.

Common sense.

just felt since some people keep grasping at straws of absurdity, I'd bump this.

If only people had a smidgen of common sense.
 
TenPenny
Avatar
#594
You won't find much common sense when people are arguing about abortion.

It goes the the heart of many people's beliefs, and therefore many people become irrational.

I figure that if people want to have an abortion, they should be permitted to do so. End of story. I don't gussy it up with arguments about when life starts, etc, those arguments, while interesting, have nothing to do with abortion rights. In my opinion.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#595
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Looks pretty human to me. I think his nibs has got about 45 years of catching up to do.

Nah. He's just confusing his version of the legal view with his version of the scientific view and with his version of the religious view.
Last edited by Ron in Regina; May 29th, 2010 at 09:46 AM..
 
Kreskin
Avatar
#596
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

You won't find much common sense when people are arguing about abortion.

It goes the the heart of many people's beliefs, and therefore many people become irrational.

I figure that if people want to have an abortion, they should be permitted to do so. End of story. I don't gussy it up with arguments about when life starts, etc, those arguments, while interesting, have nothing to do with abortion rights. In my opinion.

I agree. The 'when does life begin' debate is a red herring and really doesn't have much to do with anything.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#597
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

You won't find much common sense when people are arguing about abortion.

It goes the the heart of many people's beliefs, and therefore many people become irrational.

I figure that if people want to have an abortion, they should be permitted to do so. End of story. I don't gussy it up with arguments about when life starts, etc, those arguments, while interesting, have nothing to do with abortion rights. In my opinion.

Yep, it's just a matter of whose rights are more important, or how broad those rights should be extended.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#598
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

just felt since some people keep grasping at straws of absurdity, I'd bump this.

If only people had a smidgen of common sense.

I'd have bumped it but I didn't see it.
 
L Gilbert
No Party Affiliation
#599
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

I agree. The 'when does life begin' debate is a red herring and really doesn't have much to do with anything.

Except to those involved in it from a medical POV or a legal POV.
 
petros
#600
Too bad aborted life couldn't be supported mechanically until reaching full term.
 

Similar Threads

9
Gun Control Stance Costs NDP
by Roy | Jan 1st, 2006
3
Conservative Stance on SSM
by SirKevin | Feb 25th, 2005
no new posts