
True. But it is safer to model it on aproven model with some evolutionary modifications than to just invent something else out of the blue. Once a model is in place, then we can tinker with it bit by bit. It would be safer that way I think than to just create a whole new model from scratch all at once.

Honestly, I think there is the possibility that the US model could end up better than the Canadian one in future.
Though studies have shown that public health care models have proven more efficient than private ones, stats suggest that two-tier systems are even better.
If Canada sits back and glories in its past achievements in the marvels of the public system while the US starts looking at the more modern two-tier systems such as the one in Sweden, or the one in Singapore, etc., we may find the US vaunting its new health care success story come next generation.
I think Canada would be wise to look at how the better systems got to where they are now and learn form them.

If we are 30th and the yanks are 37th why is anyone even thinking of comparing our system with theirs? Unless they have a vested interest in a poor system and their only defense is ours is better than theirs. We want to be looking at better delivery models not worse ones.

I don't want no stinking commie health care system. It will collapse our society.
<grin>

According to the WHO in 2000 (--), Canada's health care ranks 30th worldwide:
1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
21 Belgium
22 Colombia
23 Sweden
24 Cyprus
25 Germany
26 Saudi Arabia
27 United Arab Emirates
28 Israel
29 Morocco
30 Canada
31 Finland
32 Australia
33 Chile
34 Denmark
35 Dominica
36 Costa Rica
37 United States of America

First of all. Canada is the second largest country in the world in Land area. Our system works very well for most Canadians but when the population gets too thin in some areas, those areas suffer a bit.....In some areas they suffer a lot. The best solution would be to shore up those areas as best we can to solve what we can. It will probably end up that we throw a bit more money at these areas. One thing we have to realise is that Sweden's system will have the same problems that our system has in the areas we mentioned. There is no magic answer.

First of all. Canada is the second largest country in the world in Land area. Our system works very well for most Canadians but when the population gets too thin in some areas, those areas suffer a bit.....In some areas they suffer a lot. The best solution would be to shore up those areas as best we can to solve what we can. It will probably end up that we throw a bit more money at these areas. One thing we have to realise is that Sweden's system will have the same problems that our system has in the areas we mentioned. There is no magic answer.