Login

Reforms to EI

  • Reforms to EI

jjaycee98
Conservative
#1Jun 18th, 2009
So what needs to change in regards to EI? 45 days is ludicrous! At $15/Hour a worker would have paid in less than $100 in that time.

The 2 week waiting period means you get no money for 4 weeks and are already seriously behind on bills and groceries. That needs to change IMO.

I think CRA needs to look at making a National Payroll system available on the Internet. As an employer I could do payroll on my computer and print my cheques and then upload to CRA-same as we do T4s now. This would eliminate having to do ROE's, would eliminate the cards for claimants, would eliminate the inquiries needed to check for fraudsters (and all that manpower). T4 info would be available on the "My Account" site at CRA.
 
pegger
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#2

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Yeah - I think shorting the number of days isn't the answer either. Seems to me the issue is;

1) Timeline to receive first EI cheque
2) Who qualifies
3) length of benefits
4) clawbacks

I would think that the issue in a recession is that people who have had jobs for a long time are losing them.

As to item 1) - I agree - I don't see why it takes so long for someone to get their first cheque. In this day and age, they should be able to process that faster.

item 2) IMHO - anyone who contributes should be able to collect - so either self-employed people should be able to collect - or should not have to contribute.

item 3) I'm not sure what the current length of benefits is...so I can't comment - perhaps someone else can?

item 4 - I don't understand the clawback rational. I had a friend that was laidoff - and received a payout - which of course, is clawed back from his EI. However, that payout was used to cover the length of time it took to recieve the first payment....seems to me that if someone receives a pay-out that should not affect your EI payment.
 
#juan
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#3

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
EI had a huge surplus. Something in the order of fifty billion dollars. Now I may be ignorant but either the premiums were too high or the benefits were too low. Ignatieff has been trying to get the rules relaxed so people who need it could get some benefits without the long wait times and to extend the time of those benefits during this recession. Has Harper already spent that surplus?
 
DurkaDurka
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#4

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Looks like the EI surpluses flow back into the general revenue and is spent like all other government revenue.


EI surplus balloons to $51 billion


"With Ottawa taking in more in premiums and interest than it pays out, the excess money from EI has gone in the federal government's main piggybank for use for other purposes, be that new spending or tax breaks."


"The EI system is being used as a tax grab by the federal government to spend more money elsewhere," said Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director John Williamson. "It should operate more as an insurance program, and not be used as a revenue generator by the government."
 
mt_pockets1000
Avatar
#5

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
So Harper has drained the $50B EI surplus AND is about to run a $50B deficit? May god have mercy on my taxpaying soul.
 
#juan
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#6

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Quote: Originally Posted by DurkaDurkaView Post

Looks like the EI surpluses flow back into the general revenue and is spent like all other government revenue.


EI surplus balloons to $51 billion


"With Ottawa taking in more in premiums and interest than it pays out, the excess money from EI has gone in the federal government's main piggybank for use for other purposes, be that new spending or tax breaks."


"The EI system is being used as a tax grab by the federal government to spend more money elsewhere," said Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director John Williamson. "It should operate more as an insurance program, and not be used as a revenue generator by the government."

Since the money is there and people are not going bankrupt paying the premiums, that money should only be used on the people who paid into it. The fifty billion was amassed over a ten year period so using some of it to help people through the recession sounds completely reasonable.
 
DurkaDurka
No Party Affiliation
#7

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

Since the money is there and people are not going bankrupt paying the premiums, that money should only be used on the people who paid into it. The fifty billion was amassed over a ten year period so using some of it to help people through the recession sounds completely reasonable.

I agree 100%, there is little accountability in where our EI premiums are spent.
 
#juan
No Party Affiliation
Avatar
#8

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Quote: Originally Posted by DurkaDurkaView Post

I agree 100%, there is little accountability in where our EI premiums are spent.

Spending that money on any other government purpose would be akin to a company spending the employee's pension money.
 
YukonJack
Conservative
#9

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Last time I drew EI was in 1962. Weekly benefits were $26.00.

I am unemployed now. Time for a change. I need a return on my investment.
 
DurkaDurka
No Party Affiliation
#10

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Quote: Originally Posted by YukonJackView Post

Last time I drew EI was in 1962. Weekly benefits were $26.00.

I am unemployed now. Time for a change. I need a return on my investment.

The military is always looking for a few good men....
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
Avatar
#11

Re: Reforms to EI

Jun 18th, 2009
Twelve weeks work for forty on pogey seemed generous to me - but then, I last worked seasonal stuff when it was six months for six months....
 

Similar Threads

23
Ei reforms
by VanIsle | May 16th, 2009
0
The U.N. reforms run amok.
by Sassylassie | Oct 13th, 2006
0
Gomery's Reforms Not Recommended
by FiveParadox | Mar 7th, 2006
0
UN outsourcing Reforms
by Jersay | Mar 6th, 2006
no new posts