
One of the things that annoys me most about Maritime whine is that there are ways to help themselves but they can't or won't look at them. Instead, they complain about what the rest of the Country is or isn't doing.

A perfect example would be the size of government. For just over 2.3 million people, they have 181 legislative members and four bureaucracies with close to 100,000 public servants, many providing duplicate services.
If Maritimers really wanted to help themselves, they could start by amalgamating the four provinces into one and cut the cost of managing their affairs by a significant amount. Of course, that'll never happen. There are far too many feeble excuses why it can't and it's easier to whine than it is to git er done.

However, you could also throw in Saskatchewan and Manitoba as the same - population of 2.2 Million (or so) with combined MLAs of 115...but that would never happen either.

Yup, it should. The one difference would be the size. The distance between Uranium city and Winnipeg would be problematic. Heck even the folks in Northern Ontario have been complaining about the distances to TO and there have been rumblings about splitting and joining Manitoba.
Merging Atlantic Canada a tax boon?
Telegraph Journal • By Joshua Errett • Dated: 30/3/07
Municipal amalgamations, for instance, have never realized huge savings," Cirtwill says. "And the vast majority of the staff are on the ground delivering services. You're still going to see education branch officers, hospital and health board staff. The only thing you'll get rid of is three sets of ministers, three sets of ministerial staff, and maybe some policy branches. "The core cost-drivers are still going to be there."

-- tells me work has already begun on the hydromet plant in Long Harbour. What's the deal with BC? Is some of the work happening there? I'm sure some of the engineering work will be done off the island.
As for --, we're not too concerned at the moment.
Alberta least attractive province for energy investment:
It's behind Man. and Sask., and even trails N.S. and N.L.
June 24, 2009 • CBC News
A new Fraser Institute report says Alberta is now the least attractive province in Canada when it comes to oil and gas investment.
The right-wing think tank, based in Calgary, released the report on Wednesday morning.
Research for the report included surveying petroleum executives and managers from around the world.
According to the institute's rankings, Alberta has dropped below Manitoba and Saskatchewan, and even trails Nova Scotia and Newfoundland.
The institute blames Alberta's poor showing on the industry's dissatisfaction with changes to the province's royalty regime, a lack of consultation and what it calls "a growing anti-energy bias."
The Alberta government is set to announce new drilling incentives for natural gas producers on Thursday morning.
Premier Ed Stelmach believes they're needed partly because of a threat to the province's biggest market, the United States. Stelmach said producers in Texas and Louisiana are poised to ramp up shale gas extraction, something that he worries could bump Alberta gas out of the picture.