Steven Hawking's Tutor
Posts: 4,604 
March 14th, 2008, 01:03 PM
The truly astounding component of this situation is the number of people who maintain their belief in the integrity of politicians! How many times do politicians have to be proven to be liars and theives before the true nature of the politician is acknowledged?
We've seen wars based on lies, we've seen multi-million dollar scams based on lies and sexual misconduct, drunken Preimiers, the list is endless and yet there are people still desperately clinging to their notions of honesty and integrity in Canadian and American government.
You can fool some of the people all of the time apparently....
The truly astounding component of this situation is the number of people who maintain their belief in the integrity of politicians! How many times do politicians have to be proven to be liars and theives before the true nature of the politician is acknowledged?
We've seen wars based on lies, we've seen multi-million dollar scams based on lies and sexual misconduct, drunken Preimiers, the list is endless and yet there are people still desperately clinging to their notions of honesty and integrity in Canadian and American government.
You can fool some of the people all of the time apparently....
March 14th, 2008, 04:59 PM
Quoting Poquas
And of course no one would investigate how he got a million dollar insurance payout? Come on, it doesn't pass the laugh test.
Any insurance company will underwrite the policy IF they are paid for it. The premium would be in excess of the million dollars and would then be paid out by someone other than the Conservative Party.
Additionally by filing a lawsuit, Mr. Harper can refuse to answer any questions by stating that it is before the courts.
Additionally by filing a lawsuit, Mr. Harper can refuse to answer any questions by stating that it is before the courts.
March 14th, 2008, 05:01 PM
Quoting MikeyDB
Are you contending we blindly believe the Liberals regarding what they say about the Conservatives because it must be true?
The truly astounding component of this situation is the number of people who maintain their belief in the integrity of politicians! How many times do politicians have to be proven to be liars and theives before the true nature of the politician is acknowledged?
We've seen wars based on lies, we've seen multi-million dollar scams based on lies and sexual misconduct, drunken Preimiers, the list is endless and yet there are people still desperately clinging to their notions of honesty and integrity in Canadian and American government.
You can fool some of the people all of the time apparently....
We've seen wars based on lies, we've seen multi-million dollar scams based on lies and sexual misconduct, drunken Preimiers, the list is endless and yet there are people still desperately clinging to their notions of honesty and integrity in Canadian and American government.
You can fool some of the people all of the time apparently....
Newbie
Posts: 8
March 15th, 2008, 02:03 PM
Besides, it's all moot now. Mr. Harper has been caught on tape admitting to a "financial consideration" for Mr. Cadman. Mr. Harpers denial just buried him.
Quoting Kreskin
I have a 750,000 policy. Who is going to question its payout? Why would anyone have questioned Chuck's widow receiving an insurance settlement he might have been paying into for years? You can bet a million dollar payment from the Conservative party would have raised some eybrows.
And of course no one would investigate how he got a million dollar insurance payout? Come on, it doesn't pass the laugh test.
Besides, it's all moot now. Mr. Harper has been caught on tape admitting to a "financial consideration" for Mr. Cadman. Mr. Harpers denial just buried him.
March 15th, 2008, 02:08 PM
Quoting Poquas
For the same reason people are even theorizing about it. Why would it be less public if it did happen than if it didn't?
I have a 750,000 policy. Who is going to question its payout? Why would anyone have questioned Chuck's widow receiving an insurance settlement he might have been paying into for years? You can bet a million dollar payment from the Conservative party would have raised some eybrows.
Besides, it's all moot now. Mr. Harper has been caught on tape admitting to a "financial consideration" for Mr. Cadman. Mr. Harpers denial just buried him.
Besides, it's all moot now. Mr. Harper has been caught on tape admitting to a "financial consideration" for Mr. Cadman. Mr. Harpers denial just buried him.
Steven Hawking's Tutor
Posts: 4,887
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
March 15th, 2008, 02:15 PM
My brother died in hospital shortly after brain surgery for a tumor first diagnosed 6 weeks before his operation......his insurance, for a LOT less than $700,000, investigated for 6 months before paying up to his widow.......
Would there be an investigation about a 1 million dollar payout? Oh yeah.
Insurance companies LOVE to collect premiums, they HATE to pay benefits.
Quoting Poquas
I promise you, from experience within my family, your policy will be thoroughly investigated before any payout is made.....
I have a 750,000 policy. Who is going to question its payout? Why would anyone have questioned Chuck's widow receiving an insurance settlement he might have been paying into for years? You can bet a million dollar payment from the Conservative party would have raised some eybrows.
Besides, it's all moot now. Mr. Harper has been caught on tape admitting to a "financial consideration" for Mr. Cadman. Mr. Harpers denial just buried him.
Besides, it's all moot now. Mr. Harper has been caught on tape admitting to a "financial consideration" for Mr. Cadman. Mr. Harpers denial just buried him.
My brother died in hospital shortly after brain surgery for a tumor first diagnosed 6 weeks before his operation......his insurance, for a LOT less than $700,000, investigated for 6 months before paying up to his widow.......
Would there be an investigation about a 1 million dollar payout? Oh yeah.
Insurance companies LOVE to collect premiums, they HATE to pay benefits.
Newbie
Posts: 8
March 15th, 2008, 03:05 PM
To quote my own insurance agent, "if there's no cost to us, you can buy a policy for your dying goldfish".
If an insurance policy is sold for a known to be dying man (Yes. It can be done) the payout amount and an "administration fee" would have to be paid up front to the issuing company. When it comes time to pay out on the policy there is not cost to the insurer and no issues to prevent payout.
As I said previously, the policy pays under the name of the insurer, not the Conservative party.
To quote my own insurance agent, "if there's no cost to us, you can buy a policy for your dying goldfish".
If an insurance policy is sold for a known to be dying man (Yes. It can be done) the payout amount and an "administration fee" would have to be paid up front to the issuing company. When it comes time to pay out on the policy there is not cost to the insurer and no issues to prevent payout.
As I said previously, the policy pays under the name of the insurer, not the Conservative party.
