I was wondering what is the difference between the Prime Minister and the Governor General? Who is more powerful and influential between these two?
I was wondering what is the difference between the Prime Minister and the Governor General? Who is more powerful and influential between these two?
Toro, the prime minister certainly does not “ha[ve] all the power”.
Governors General in Canada have refused to act on the advice of their prime ministers, and even as recently as the 38th Parliament of Canada, it was reported by her office that The Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson P.C., C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D., the 26th Governor General of Canada was watching the minority legislature extremely closely for abuses by the previous Government of Canada that may have required Ms. Clarkson’s intervention.
Moreover, our Governors’ General reluctance to exercise their constitutional prerogatives does not in any way diminish the powers at their disposal. Our vice-regal representatives of The Queen has a vast armament of constitutional powers for use during an emergency, in order to protect and kick-start democracy where needed. (For example, if a prime minister acts in clear and flagrant violation of the Constitution Acts, 1867–1982—for example, refusing to advise the dissolution of the legislature once the five-year term has expired, the Governor General can quite simply fire the prime minister.)
The constitutional framework of Canada is quite clear.
Toro, the prime minister certainly does not “ha[ve] all the power”.
Governors General in Canada have refused to act on the advice of their prime ministers, and even as recently as the 38th Parliament of Canada, it was reported by her office that The Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson P.C., C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D., the 26th Governor General of Canada was watching the minority legislature extremely closely for abuses by the previous Government of Canada that may have required Ms. Clarkson’s intervention.
Moreover, our Governors’ General reluctance to exercise their constitutional prerogatives does not in any way diminish the powers at their disposal. Our vice-regal representatives of The Queen has a vast armament of constitutional powers for use during an emergency, in order to protect and kick-start democracy where needed. (For example, if a prime minister acts in clear and flagrant violation of the Constitution Acts, 1867–1982—for example, refusing to advise the dissolution of the legislature once the five-year term has expired, the Governor General can quite simply fire the prime minister.)
The constitutional framework of Canada is quite clear.