A modern nomad
Posts: 1,118 
Location: Berlin, Germany
Location: Berlin, Germany
January 24th, 2008, 05:07 PM
During the cold war the USSR tried to extend their influence and backed a certain movement in Afghanistan. As was their philosophy at the time, the USA began to support an opposing faction: the Mujahideen. When the USSR withdrew support, the Mujahideen overpowered the opposition and stormed the nation. The USA withdrew interest from the nation. The Mujahideen slowly degenerated into the type of government that warlords do best: despotic tyranny plagued by violence by the "officials". Out of this mess, Pakistan funded the Taliban with the premise of saving this nation from the barbarism. They chased the barbaric Mujahideen out, and various warlords, reportedly responsible for rapes, murders and acid throwing, regrouped into the Northern Alliance.
As the cycle continued, the Taliban became the barbarians they had tried to oppose. Now NATO has entered an area which drastically needs peace, with a manifest purpose of bringing peace to this region. But the Northern Alliance as their allies, is this going to be helpful? Why this region and not the Congo? Take a look at a map, is this the only region in the world that needs peace? Has a war of peace ever worked?
During the cold war the USSR tried to extend their influence and backed a certain movement in Afghanistan. As was their philosophy at the time, the USA began to support an opposing faction: the Mujahideen. When the USSR withdrew support, the Mujahideen overpowered the opposition and stormed the nation. The USA withdrew interest from the nation. The Mujahideen slowly degenerated into the type of government that warlords do best: despotic tyranny plagued by violence by the "officials". Out of this mess, Pakistan funded the Taliban with the premise of saving this nation from the barbarism. They chased the barbaric Mujahideen out, and various warlords, reportedly responsible for rapes, murders and acid throwing, regrouped into the Northern Alliance.
As the cycle continued, the Taliban became the barbarians they had tried to oppose. Now NATO has entered an area which drastically needs peace, with a manifest purpose of bringing peace to this region. But the Northern Alliance as their allies, is this going to be helpful? Why this region and not the Congo? Take a look at a map, is this the only region in the world that needs peace? Has a war of peace ever worked?
January 24th, 2008, 05:23 PM
Quoting Niflmir
WW II
During the cold war the USSR tried to extend their influence and backed a certain movement in Afghanistan. As was their philosophy at the time, the USA began to support an opposing faction: the Mujahideen. When the USSR withdrew support, the Mujahideen overpowered the opposition and stormed the nation. The USA withdrew interest from the nation. The Mujahideen slowly degenerated into the type of government that warlords do best: despotic tyranny plagued by violence by the "officials". Out of this mess, Pakistan funded the Taliban with the premise of saving this nation from the barbarism. They chased the barbaric Mujahideen out, and various warlords, reportedly responsible for rapes, murders and acid throwing, regrouped into the Northern Alliance.
As the cycle continued, the Taliban became the barbarians they had tried to oppose. Now NATO has entered an area which drastically needs peace, with a manifest purpose of bringing peace to this region. But the Northern Alliance as their allies, is this going to be helpful? Why this region and not the Congo? Take a look at a map, is this the only region in the world that needs peace? Has a war of peace ever worked?
As the cycle continued, the Taliban became the barbarians they had tried to oppose. Now NATO has entered an area which drastically needs peace, with a manifest purpose of bringing peace to this region. But the Northern Alliance as their allies, is this going to be helpful? Why this region and not the Congo? Take a look at a map, is this the only region in the world that needs peace? Has a war of peace ever worked?
Hawkings former plumber
Posts: 8,428
Videos: 1
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
Videos: 1
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
January 24th, 2008, 06:08 PM
"Bear poop"
"support bra without wires" "measures an erection as personal growth" "inflatable girlfriend" "circle jerk" "K-Y" "knob burn" "labeled on your knobs at birth"
I believe that your choice of course subject matter amply supports my thoughts about your value as a person. Psycology is not my main interest but I do know enough to suspect 'penile envy syndrome', I think that's quite a close preliminary diagnosis but you would of course have to make an appointment with a professional, and get a second opinion.
You are a hot head Bear, easy to ruffle, easy to predict, easy to deal with, just plain easy. Seems you've been insulted easily as well. Spilled my beer didn't you? Useless twit. You're not going to enjoy The New Socialist World Order.
"Bear poop"
"support bra without wires" "measures an erection as personal growth" "inflatable girlfriend" "circle jerk" "K-Y" "knob burn" "labeled on your knobs at birth"
I believe that your choice of course subject matter amply supports my thoughts about your value as a person. Psycology is not my main interest but I do know enough to suspect 'penile envy syndrome', I think that's quite a close preliminary diagnosis but you would of course have to make an appointment with a professional, and get a second opinion.
You are a hot head Bear, easy to ruffle, easy to predict, easy to deal with, just plain easy. Seems you've been insulted easily as well. Spilled my beer didn't you? Useless twit. You're not going to enjoy The New Socialist World Order.
