The Dion Danger

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
I notice there's a new round of slick conservative ads attacking Stephane Dion. No opposition leader in Canadian history has faced such a concerted media blitz by the party in power and few oppositions have had to put up with such harsh partisanship as being carried out by the conservatives in Parliment. Not only are they refusing to allow longstanding priviledges tradtionally enjoyed by all MPs as part of their democratic role, the conservatives have actively tried to prevent the smooth functioning of Parliment for purely political reasons. All the conservative initiatives seem to have one purpose, the removal of any effective opposition from our Parlimentary system, to be replaced with one-party control of the country. The MP in my own riding has gone as far as appointing a government representative to the constituents in a riding already held by an MP from another party. The message is clear that unless you support the conservatives the government will not work for you, this is the opposite of democracy, it's totalitarianism.

Also another thing to keep in mind, if Stephane Dion is as ineffective as the conservatives and their media flaks proclaim so loudly, why are millions of dollars being spent to convince people not to support him. Clearly we're being sold a load of BS when it comes to Stephane Dion. The truth is he's the only politician that offers a real future for this country. If Harper and his minions have their way there will be no Canada in the near future in the same way the last conservative government almost destroyed the nation by being more concerned with meeting the needs of the far right in the US.

Only those who want to see the end of this great nation need to fear Stephane Dion, for the rest of us he stands for what this nation truely is at its core.
 
Last edited:

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
Aw crap ! When you spend more effort in bashing the other guy it just mean you have no substance to bring forth.
Dion looks lost by himself , isn't that bad publicity in its self?
I'm starting to hate this Party system we have here. Its street gangs fighting for territory at the expense for what really needs to be adressed.
Not a damn party seems to hold any integrity for me and I guess it never will.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
All too often, a person will say, I am voting for the conservatives because the liberals are a corrupt pack of morons.

It is my personal opinion that if you ever vote with that mentality, you are destroying the country. Vote for the person you think is a good candidate, the person you think is a good leader. If no one is qualified, cast an empty ballot, if you don't like our electoral system, don't show up, if you don't like some candidate, don't base your vote on that.

When the government is inept, we need a direct tool of accountability to right that, so that elections can be used for hiring the most qualified. Using it to enact retribution is the principal that legitimizes democracy. I had hoped the Conservative spawned accountability act would enable this, but I was disappointed on this.
 

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
I don't have that luxury from where i live....I'm totaly against the Bloc and my choices was for the one who has a better chance of winning over them...Glad to say theres one less Bloc candidate. I love my country and will do my part for it to stay together faults and all.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
To blame the conservatives for Dion's shortcoming is a stretch. I think the conservatives have pinpointed Dion's perceived weaknesses and hammered away at them. Dion, by not countering any sort of defense to this, has made him self to look like a spineless leader in my opinion.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The real winner out of all of this will be Layton, but even a win for the NDP will be a win for Conservatives too. It's going to be like what happened to the Conservatives and Reform all over again. Perhaps this is pushing us into a two partied system, hope not, but who knows.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON
If Dion had a backbone there is one very simple way to put an end to it. Force an election. By becoming patsies they are willing accomplices to everything you pin on the Conservatives.

As for the ads, have you ever seen a leader attacked using his own words? I've seen plenty of negative ads from both sides but this is the first that features the attacked leader saying something in their own voice. Quite ironic actually.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
I don't have that luxury from where i live....I'm totaly against the Bloc and my choices was for the one who has a better chance of winning over them...Glad to say theres one less Bloc candidate. I love my country and will do my part for it to stay together faults and all.

See but that's just the point. You think, hey it may be that the majority of the people support the Bloc Quebecois, so you decide to vote in such a way as to subvert the perceived outcome.

Everyone must vote for a person that best represents them and abide by the democratic decisions that the resulting government makes. Voting in such a way that your intention is to skew the results away from what would best represent the people is just bad for everybody.

When a sizable proportion of people vote in a subverting manner, three things happen:
  1. A party which does not well represent the people is overrepresented,
  2. A party (or parties) which would have well represented the people doesn't receive the votes that went to the first party,
  3. and the party that people are voting against get just as many votes and thus the same amount of representation.
 

Toro

Senate Member
See but that's just the point. You think, hey it may be that the majority of the people support the Bloc Quebecois, so you decide to vote in such a way as to subvert the perceived outcome.

Everyone must vote for a person that best represents them and abide by the democratic decisions that the resulting government makes. Voting in such a way that your intention is to skew the results away from what would best represent the people is just bad for everybody.

When a sizable proportion of people vote in a subverting manner, three things happen:
  1. A party which does not well represent the people is overrepresented,
  2. A party (or parties) which would have well represented the people doesn't receive the votes that went to the first party,
  3. and the party that people are voting against get just as many votes and thus the same amount of representation.

N

It is not bad for everybody.

Democracy is the representative will of the people. It is no less subversive to the popular will if the primary motivation of a voter is to stop a candidate. If that is what people put the highest priority, then not voting in such a manner is far more likely to skew the outcome which best represents the will of the people.

Certainly you would agree that in the prior French election before the most recent one, most of the socialist supporters who voted for Mitterand in the run-off did so because they did not want Le Pen to be President as opposed to supporting Mitterand, and that was ultimately the most representative outcome of the French electorate?
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Attack me with my own words and beware.... If the attacker will manipulate words another has spoken to use them out of context for his gain, what will he do with the wishes of other people - or those of a population he is sworn to represent?

Woof!
 

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
If Dion had a backbone there is one very simple way to put an end to it. Force an election. By becoming patsies they are willing accomplices to everything you pin on the Conservatives.

As for the ads, have you ever seen a leader attacked using his own words? I've seen plenty of negative ads from both sides but this is the first that features the attacked leader saying something in their own voice. Quite ironic actually.

The Conservatives have taken this approach in the past with Chretien and offended many Canadians. I know I'm tired of seeing ads attacking the opposition leader when the minority government is doing everything it can to waste taxpayers money and the time of Parliment.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
It's hard to take a guy who acts like the spoiled rich kid in the sandbox seriously. Time for Harpo to put that needle nose to the grindstone and set those beady little eyes on the business of governing. He's milked it for all it's worth.

Woof!
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
It's hard to take a guy who acts like the spoiled rich kid in the sandbox seriously. Time for Harpo to put that needle nose to the grindstone and set those beady little eyes on the business of governing. He's milked it for all it's worth.

Woof!
Damn it Wolf with posts like that i might have to start liking you again :lol:Just quit calling me a parasite and we'll get along fine :p
 

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
It's hard to take a guy who acts like the spoiled rich kid in the sandbox seriously. Time for Harpo to put that needle nose to the grindstone and set those beady little eyes on the business of governing. He's milked it for all it's worth.

Woof!

Harper is hard at work.

Problem is he's not working for the country, like Mulroney before him his eyes are firmly fixed to the south dreaming about the Neo-con paradise he could turn Canada into if he ever got a majority.

Harris' "common sense revolution" would be a drop in the bucket compared to the changes we'd see.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Harper is hard at work.

Problem is he's not working for the country, like Mulroney before him his eyes are firmly fixed to the south dreaming about the Neo-con paradise he could turn Canada into if he ever got a majority.

Harris' "common sense revolution" would be a drop in the bucket compared to the changes we'd see.

Considering the number of former Harris Tories (Harris was asked to disassociate himself) in his caucus/cabinet, I can well imagine what he'd have lurking for Canadians.

Woof!
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
I know I'm tired of seeing ads attacking the opposition leader when the minority government is doing everything it can to waste taxpayers money and the time of Parliment.
I hate it when they tax me less.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
Harris' "common sense revolution" would be a drop in the bucket compared to the changes we'd see.
Hope you're right; Harris was the best leader we had in Ontario in my lifetime, and I ain't that young.
 

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
Hope you're right; Harris was the best leader we had in Ontario in my lifetime, and I ain't that young.

Several thousand people in Walkerton would disagree with you as would the family of Dudley George. The Harris government also left a several billion dollar defecit despite claiming the opposite and its social policies were a disaster. There's a difference between making war on povert and making war on the poor.

The "Common Sense Revolution" was a sham and so is Harpers kinder gentler government.