The so called Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the worst amendment to the Constittution and should be abolished.
It limits police and government power.IT allows illegal immigant criminals to stay in
Canada, It is redundant and is totally unclear.It has mired the supreme court in trivial decision making.
It brings the administration of justice into disrepute.
In the pre charter days if you had a warrant for your arrest the police could enter any residence at any time and get you.
No. That doesn't mean that the police would destroy the property of Canadian citizens in the process. Historically, the police would knock on the door and say to a homeowner that there is a wanted person inside and the homeowner would either give him up or the police would come in by force(and then possibly bash a door or two) if the homeowner refused to cooperate.
Canada worked fine prior to 1982.
Nowadays if a person is arrestable but they are in a home you have to apply for a "Feeney " warrant. Sorry. But I don't agree.If you are wanted by the government They should be able to come and get you.Anywhere. Anytime. I don't care how trivial the charge is. Accountability is accountability.Do the crime expect the police to come and get you.
Too many criminals and immigrants have "gotten off" as a result of a Charter argument.
Do you think the same applies for countries like Singapore?
Get rid of the Charter and you get rid of our weak Justice system.
And yes this argument applies to the sections covering gay rights, immigration, marriage, etc.. There was and is still in place mechanisms to prevent and address prejudice and bigotry. The Charter is not necessary.
It limits police and government power.IT allows illegal immigant criminals to stay in
Canada, It is redundant and is totally unclear.It has mired the supreme court in trivial decision making.
It brings the administration of justice into disrepute.
In the pre charter days if you had a warrant for your arrest the police could enter any residence at any time and get you.
No. That doesn't mean that the police would destroy the property of Canadian citizens in the process. Historically, the police would knock on the door and say to a homeowner that there is a wanted person inside and the homeowner would either give him up or the police would come in by force(and then possibly bash a door or two) if the homeowner refused to cooperate.
Canada worked fine prior to 1982.
Nowadays if a person is arrestable but they are in a home you have to apply for a "Feeney " warrant. Sorry. But I don't agree.If you are wanted by the government They should be able to come and get you.Anywhere. Anytime. I don't care how trivial the charge is. Accountability is accountability.Do the crime expect the police to come and get you.
Too many criminals and immigrants have "gotten off" as a result of a Charter argument.
Do you think the same applies for countries like Singapore?
Get rid of the Charter and you get rid of our weak Justice system.
And yes this argument applies to the sections covering gay rights, immigration, marriage, etc.. There was and is still in place mechanisms to prevent and address prejudice and bigotry. The Charter is not necessary.