DND Lied About Afghanistan Mission: Major Failure

Palestine87

Time Out
Jun 9, 2007
32
1
8
Canada
'Dramatic' Taliban resurgence detailed


June 14, 2007 at 4:34 AM EDT

OTTAWA — An analysis of the situation in Afghanistan last fall prepared for top levels of the Canadian government warned that the country was becoming "two Afghanistans" with the situation in the fractious South and West continuing to deteriorate and the position of President Hamid Karzai "weakening to a new low."
This grim assessment of Afghan reality was prepared last November by the International Assessment Staff of the Privy Council Office, which effectively acts as Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government department.
A series of heavily censored documents prepared by the PCO were obtained by The Globe and Mail after Access to Information requests by information expert Jeff Esau.
The briefing notes, with the author's name, were apparently intended for Gregory Fyffe, executive director of the 60-strong assessment unit, and were prepared after Canadian NATO troops based in Kandahar in the volatile southern region had suffered several bloody months of combat.
"The Taliban resurgence has been dramatic," stated a document dated Nov. 9, 2006.
It describes how the faltering insurgency was given a huge boost by support from sources in Pakistan, the Gulf states and "Jihadi-minded groups and individuals."
"The unpredicted success that suicide bombers and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) had in southern Afghanistan last winter further reinforced the spiralling growth of financial assistance, recruitment, training, equipping and morale improvement" of the Taliban, it said, noting that insurgent spirits were particularly raised with the high-profile shooting down of several helicopters.
The paper was slightly more upbeat when it came to analyzing the threat that the insurgency could spread throughout the country, noting that the Taliban lacked popular support in regions outside the South. But it did consider the consequences if NATO failed in its mission, mulling the possibility that the Taliban could "prevail in the South because of a successful propaganda effort that politically forces NATO out of that area."
Because of expanding poppy cultivation and the growing insurgency, the analysis noted, the deterioration of security had effectively created "two Afghanistans" with the North and West advancing while the South and East remain "fractious and relatively stagnant."
As for Mr. Karzai, the PCO analysis noted that his leadership is "continuously challenged and eroded by the many problems facing Afghanistan and the complex relationships over which he has no control. Consequently, Karzai's support may be weakening to a new low."
It adds that Mr. Karzai faces "questions of legitimacy for his governance team - both in Kabul and out in the provinces."
The blunt analysis of the situation is in stark contrast with other Afghan-related documents released at the same time by the PCO and which consist of upbeat "messages and storylines" about how well things were going in Afghanistan and how there were "signs of progress, unthinkable only a few years ago." These messages are clearly aimed at bolstering shaky public support for the mission.
"By supporting the rebuilding of institutions such as independent courts, police and the army, Canada is on the ground laying the foundation for Afghans to govern themselves and secure a better future," one of the documents said.
In contrast, the more candid PCO assessment notes only "mixed success" in reforming the Afghan justice system and addressing "a culture of immunity among major warlords, criminals, drug lords and political figures." And it calls Afghan security forces "weak and undeveloped."
TWO TAKES
On reconstruction
'We are making significant progress in Afghanistan. Canadian, Afghan and international reconstruction efforts have yielded positive results.'
Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor, Nov. 10, 2006
'The lack of tangible reconstruction in the South (but not in the North) only served to prove the point that the writ of the ... government in Kabul was weak ... in Pashtun areas.'
International Assessment Staff
report, Nov. 9, 2006
On Afghan institutions
'In the five years since the fall of the Taliban regime, Afghans have taken control of their destiny. They have done so by voting for it in peaceful presidential and parliamentary elections; by establishing institutions to provide services to Afghans ...'
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, in op-ed article signed with Dutch PM Jan Peter Balkenende, Nov. 28, 2006
'The five major elements of Security Sector Reform have had mixed success. Justice Sector Reform has been slow in making a difference that could demonstrate progress in addressing a culture of immunity among major warlords, criminals, drug lords and political figures.'
International Assessment Staff
report, Nov. 9, 2006
On illegal activity
'We will continue to vigorously support Afghan efforts to strengthen the rule of law, tackle corruption and take action against illegal narcotics.'
Mr. Harper and Mr. Balkenende, Nov. 28, 2006
'The expanding opium cultivation crisis is pervasive and increasingly linked to the rebounding insurgency, especially in southern Afghanistan.'
International Assessment Staff
report, Nov. 9, 2006

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070614.wafghanreport14/BNStory/Afghanistan/home
 

Palestine87

Time Out
Jun 9, 2007
32
1
8
Canada
So what does everyone think about this new revelation, well its not really new in the minds of people protesting the war in Afghanistan but has it shocked some people possibly??
 

mabudon

Metal King
Mar 15, 2006
1,339
30
48
Golden Horseshoe, Ontario
Probably not, sadly- the folks who are against the "war" are always wrong, the only things that change is what they're charged with being "wrong" about in the eyes of the cheerleaders
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Well it seems quiet on this forum. I guess people already know that the situation in Afghanistan is hopeless or they just don't want to listen to the truth as issued by the government's PMO's office.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Colpy offers fairly balanced opinions of things, he's hardly a neo-con, if thats what you think of him.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Nah, he isn't a neo-con but he is conservative in ideology and fun to debate. I was just using Colpy as an example because I was surprised to see not one person with a possible conservative leaning or support of a conservative party in Canada or the States stay something in defense of the mission.