If Chretien would've stayed as PM in 2004

Stephenharper

New Member
Nov 23, 2006
1
0
1
Would he have won his 4th majority government? I mean Paul Martin was the Finance Minister. So it's safe to say that Martin held 100% responsibility for the Sponsership scandal. Chretien had nothing to do with it, and wouln't have lost as many seats as Martin has due to the scandal.

Too bad Chretien stepped down. All these elections are wasting our tax money.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Would he have won his 4th majority government? I mean Paul Martin was the Finance Minister. So it's safe to say that Martin held 100% responsibility for the Sponsership scandal. Chretien had nothing to do with it, and wouln't have lost as many seats as Martin has due to the scandal.

Too bad Chretien stepped down. All these elections are wasting our tax money.
I would hope that we would have had the regime change we did anyways. It was time, we needed to rid the stench of liberal elitism from the hill.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Hello? Martin took the fall for Chretien. The Sponsorship mess was a Chretien disaster. His ignominy in the province is legion. Shame on Jean for turning a blind eye to such blatant and widespread corruption.
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
Cough choke, gag me with a spoon pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee I liked Martin but Chretien was a choke cough can't speak without choking I pass the torch to those who can. Stevie why do you look like Mr. Bobble Head?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Hello? Martin took the fall for Chretien. The Sponsorship mess was a Chretien disaster. His ignominy in the province is legion. Shame on Jean for turning a blind eye to such blatant and widespread corruption.
Turning a blind eye?

I think he led the way, lol.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Would he have won his 4th majority government? I mean Paul Martin was the Finance Minister. So it's safe to say that Martin held 100% responsibility for the Sponsership scandal. Chretien had nothing to do with it, and wouln't have lost as many seats as Martin has due to the scandal.

Too bad Chretien stepped down. All these elections are wasting our tax money.

If you REALLY think Jean Chretien had nothuing to do with the sponsorship scandal..........do I have a swamp.....I mean a LAND deal for you!

AND, you must be a Liberal, because damn near nobody outside the Liberal Party would make such a dumbass statement.:laughing7:
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I think theres probably even Liberals who wouldn't claim that. No way would Chretien have won another majority, or even minority.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Chretien carrying on after 2004? Now there's a scary thought. The Liberals would have been slaughtered even worse than they were, perhaps even to the point of a Conservative majority. The sponsorship scandal happened on Chretien's watch, and it was run out of the PMO, *his* office. Martin at least had some credibility in claiming he didn't know about it, Chretien would have had none and he and his party would have gone down in flames. Besides, it was time for a change, and a Conservative minority is a lot less alarming to me than a Conservative majority. I remember that smarmy Mulroney too clearly, and the Conservative government of Grant Devine in my home province too clearly. After that I am unable to trust people who call themselves Conservative, and please note that the upper case C matters. There are some thoughtful and intelligent conservatives on this board, but thoughtful and intelligent Conservatives are, since Dalton Camp died, an endangered species. Joe Clark may be the last of them. I regret to say that my understanding of Canadian politics over the last 25 years strongly suggests that the modern political right is ethically bankrupt and intellectually sterile. I am not, and cannot be, a Conservative.

I'm not a LIberal either. I'm sorry that Harper's going to make that motion in the House about the Québécois being a nation, because it removes the sting from Ignatieff's ill-considered remarks about it a few weeks ago and makes the debate at the upcoming Liberal leadership convention on a similar resolution moot. The Liberals deserved to squirm a bit; Harper's motion makes it too easy for them.

Nor am I an automatic NDP supporter. Most days I think the current version of the NDP is stuck in the 1960s: promise them pie in the sky and scare them with depression talk.

What I hope for is an intelligent and thoughtful candidate running in my riding, for *any* party. I haven't seen one of those for a long time. Makes me wish I'd bought a house in Regina a few kilometres south east of where I did. Then I'd be in Ralph Goodale's riding; that's somebody I could vote for with a clear conscience. But most of the time when I vote I hold my nose and vote for the least offensive alternative. And that's not the way it should be.