I have always lived by the rule, that as a man I have no right to tell a woman, what to do with her body. From looks to abortion, it is not my body, I have no right to force my beliefs on it.
But, something has gone wrong.
The rights of the one should not out weigh the rights of others. Should it?
My first example is, a young man dates a young lady for awhile. They do the deed and she ends up pregnant. She does not tell him she's pregnant and they break up, without him ever knowing.
Months go by and the youn man recieves a call from his ex's family. They explain she is to deep in to drugs and that she is messed up, completely unable to care for a child.
The young man, being a stand up guy, begins to put things in place to relieve the young lady of the responsiblity of motherhood, with the assistance of CAS and other government agencies. But unbeknowst to him, the young lady is in communication with a childless family and plans to give them the child.
The child is born. The young man goes to the hospital to bring home his little bundle, only to have his heart broken. The family with which the young lady had been talking, have come and claimed the child with legal documentation, signed by the childs mother.
Long story short. He's spent almost $50,000 in legal bills, proven he is the biological father, and still has limited visitation.
How have his rights as a father been up held?
Example two, same sinario, same sad ending to the relationship. But the young lady plans to abort the child. The young man finds out and pleads with her not to, and says he will take on all the responsiblity, and she can go on her marry way. She refuses and terminates the child.
How have his rights as a father been up held?
Example three, Same thing again, to the letter. But only this time, the young lady wants to keep the child. But the young man is not mentally or financially ready to take on fatherhood. He pleads with her to not go through with the pregnancy, but to no avail. She files a paternaty suit and wins, now hes paying for a child he can not afford to have.
How have his rights, not to be a father been up held?
Not only is there an inbalance in the justice system favouring women, but it seems that women are no longer responsible for their own actions and are able to have their cake and eat it too.
Where in the supposed equality here?
Where is justice here?
Or am I just getting cynical in my older age?
But, something has gone wrong.
The rights of the one should not out weigh the rights of others. Should it?
My first example is, a young man dates a young lady for awhile. They do the deed and she ends up pregnant. She does not tell him she's pregnant and they break up, without him ever knowing.
Months go by and the youn man recieves a call from his ex's family. They explain she is to deep in to drugs and that she is messed up, completely unable to care for a child.
The young man, being a stand up guy, begins to put things in place to relieve the young lady of the responsiblity of motherhood, with the assistance of CAS and other government agencies. But unbeknowst to him, the young lady is in communication with a childless family and plans to give them the child.
The child is born. The young man goes to the hospital to bring home his little bundle, only to have his heart broken. The family with which the young lady had been talking, have come and claimed the child with legal documentation, signed by the childs mother.
Long story short. He's spent almost $50,000 in legal bills, proven he is the biological father, and still has limited visitation.
How have his rights as a father been up held?
Example two, same sinario, same sad ending to the relationship. But the young lady plans to abort the child. The young man finds out and pleads with her not to, and says he will take on all the responsiblity, and she can go on her marry way. She refuses and terminates the child.
How have his rights as a father been up held?
Example three, Same thing again, to the letter. But only this time, the young lady wants to keep the child. But the young man is not mentally or financially ready to take on fatherhood. He pleads with her to not go through with the pregnancy, but to no avail. She files a paternaty suit and wins, now hes paying for a child he can not afford to have.
How have his rights, not to be a father been up held?
Not only is there an inbalance in the justice system favouring women, but it seems that women are no longer responsible for their own actions and are able to have their cake and eat it too.
Where in the supposed equality here?
Where is justice here?
Or am I just getting cynical in my older age?
Last edited: