Immigration will increase in Canada for 2007 and beyond

Researcher87

Electoral Member
Sep 20, 2006
496
2
18
In Monsoon West (B.C)
Ottawa has increased its annual immigration target to the highest level in 25 years, and aims to accept between 240,000 and 265,000 newcomers in 2007 -- human capital needed to fill Canada's "extraordinary" labour market requirements, Immigration Minister Monte Solberg says.
Mr. Solberg also acknowledged that Canada's current immigration model is flawed and pledged to introduce changes to address the enormous backlog of 800,000 applicants, as well as to adjust the selection process so that skilled tradespeople can qualify to come here.
"We were built on immigration and we think it wasn't just important in the past but is critical to the future," he said in an interview. "The numbers are big because we think they'll help the country."
The minister's annual report to Parliament, tabled yesterday, noted that Canada is on track to accept the high end of this year's target of 225,000 to 255,000 immigrants. There were 262,236 accepted in 2005, a higher-than-projected number. About 60 per cent of these are economic immigrants and their dependants (including skilled workers, those sponsored under provincial nominee programs and live-in caregivers), while the other 40 per cent are family members and refugees. In 2007, Ottawa aims to accept 15,000 more economic immigrants than it did last year, and will freeze the number of grandparents and parents at between 18,000 and 19,000.
Related to this article

Latest Comments


Follow this writer



The top source country for immigrants continues to be China, which represented 16 per cent of all newcomers in 2005, followed by India (13 per cent), the Philippines (7 per cent), Pakistan (5 per cent) and the United States (3 per cent).
Immigration policy analysts and lawyers applauded Ottawa's increased targets, but criticized the report for failing to set out specific solutions to the many problems that threaten to cripple Canada's immigration model, including the backlog, waiting times of four to five years and a selection model that favours white-collar professionals over skilled tradespeople while Canada's economy needs both.
Sharryn Aiken, a professor of refugee and immigration law at Queen's University, said the targets are meaningless "if the government doesn't ensure the tools to achieve them are put in place."
Added Sergio Karas, an immigration lawyer: "This is the highest level in 25 years. If we are bringing in the kinds of immigrants the economy needs, it is a good thing, but if we're bringing immigrants who cannot find jobs and get their credentials recognized, then we have a problem."
Mr. Solberg stressed the importance of giving immigrants the help they need to succeed in Canada, and noted that $307-million was pledged in last spring's budget for language training and other settlement services, and $18-million for an agency to assess and recognize foreign credentials.
"Obviously the system must be much more responsive to labour market needs than it is today. We are working on that, but not prepared to announce today," he said. "It is important to find a pathway for people who don't have university degrees who want to play by rules and want to make a contribution . . . we want to find a way to get them in and find a pathway to permanent residency."
Last week, Citizenship and Immigration Canada announced it would not support a plan to regularize the status of the estimated 200,000 undocumented workers in Canada, many of whom work in construction. Mr. Solberg said yesterday a program to allow in skilled tradespeople would address that.
Olivia Chow, an NDP MP, said the immigration target should be higher. "We need more immigrants because of our aging population. We need families and young people for productivity and economic growth," she said.
The report noted the comparatively low number of immigrants who speak French. In 2005, only 4.6 per cent of immigrants spoke French, compared with 50 per cent who speak English, despite the fact that Quebec took in 16.5 per cent of all immigrants. Quebec sets its own immigration targets and is in charge of selection. Thirty-six per cent of newcomers spoke neither French nor English.
In 2005, nearly 54 per cent of immigrants settled in Ontario, while 17 per cent went to British Columbia.
Lorne Waldman, a Toronto immigration lawyer, said that the skilled-worker program is in "total disarray" because of the long waiting times, and that he has many clients who decided to immigrate instead to the U.S. "Immigration policy has been completely neglected since the Conservatives came to power," he said.
*****
Immigration changes
Ottawa wants more immigrants and aims to accept up to 265,000 newcomers in 2007 - the highest level in more than a decade. Canada is on track to accept between 225,000 to 255,000 immigrants this year.
2005 immigrant breakdown*
Skilled workers: 130,242 - 49.67%
Business immigrants: 13,469 - 5.14%
Provincial nominees: 8,049 - 3.07%
Live-in caregivers: 4,552 - 1.74%
Spouses, partners, children and others: 50,881 - 19.40%
Parents and grandparents: 12,471 - 4.76%
Government-assisted refugees: 7,416 - 2.83%
Privately sponsored refugees: 2,976 - 1.13%
Protected persons: 19,935 - 7.6%
Dependants abroad: 5,441 - 2.07%
Humanitarian grounds: 6,653 - 2.54%
Permit holders: 143 - 0.05%
No category: 10 - 0.01%
*Numbers don't add up to 100 due to rounding.
Top 10 countries of origin, 2005
China: 42,491
India: 33,146
Philippines: 17,535
Pakistan: 13,576
U.S.: 9,262
Colombia: 6,031
U.K.: 5,865
South Korea: 5,819
Iran: 5,502
France: 5,430
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061101.wximmigration01/BNStory/National/home

Finally, one thing good out of the conservative government.
 

annabattler

Electoral Member
Jun 3, 2005
264
2
18
This number of 250,000 happens to be exactly the same as it was in the early 1980's.
Of course,with a huge backlog, slow immigration proceedings, and the "newish" family class of immigration. I doubt that the number will be reached.
I sure hope that our international embassies are very clear with potential immigrants, those with highly developed professional skills.
Until we get our act together here, those immigrants will continue to be disillusionned with their choice of Canada....and what a waste of human talent it is to have scientists,doctors,lawyers forced to take jobs in factories or driving cabs or porters at airports.
 

Vereya

Council Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,003
54
48
Tula
The increase in immigration sounds inspiring. I hope that I will finally be able to come. It is over two years now that I am trying to come to Canada, where my parents live, and nothing seems to be working so far... :(
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
This number of 250,000 happens to be exactly the same as it was in the early 1980's.
Of course,with a huge backlog, slow immigration proceedings, and the "newish" family class of immigration. I doubt that the number will be reached.
I sure hope that our internation.


I agree with the general idea, but I also believe we should be selective about what cultures and countries we allow immigrants in from. I think we should close our doors to certain areas of the world, the Middle East for one thing, Africa and other black nations for another. We have enough problems without importing them to our borders
 

Researcher87

Electoral Member
Sep 20, 2006
496
2
18
In Monsoon West (B.C)
I agree with the general idea, but I also believe we should be selective about what cultures and countries we allow immigrants in from. I think we should close our doors to certain areas of the world, the Middle East for one thing, Africa and other black nations for another. We have enough problems without importing them to our borders

I disagree entirely. Canada shouldn't b just for White people. It has grown to be mulicultural and we should accep anyone that wants to come into the country, especially on humanitarian grounds.
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
I disagree entirely. Canada shouldn't b just for White people. It has grown to be mulicultural and we should accep anyone that wants to come into the country, especially on humanitarian grounds.


Yes, and no. Blacks in general do not prove to be productive members of society-note the high rise of black on black crimes in Toronto. Muslims also insist on having the country succomd to their whims and allow them to overtake our own values. Note the numbers of them insisiting on sending their children to Catholic high schools.

I did not say we should be an all white country. I just think we should cease to be the dumping grounds for the downtrodden masses of the world and start to take care of our own people. With so many homeless people in our major cities, we hardly need to be exporting more people at this time.

I have, by the way, no issue with allowing Asians into the country since they seem to be productive citizens. It is not our job to take on the affairs of the world within our own borders. Nothing wrong with a Canadian government dedicated to the Canadian people for a change.
 

pensivesedition

New Member
Jun 29, 2008
2
0
1
Yes, and no. Blacks in general do not prove to be productive members of society...-Muslims also insist on having the country succomd to their whims and allow them to overtake our own values.

With so many homeless people in our major cities, we hardly need to be exporting more people at this time.

I have, by the way, no issue with allowing Asians into the country since they seem to be productive citizens.... Nothing wrong with a Canadian government dedicated to the Canadian people for a change.

Wow... some white canadians are racist and are criminals, but not because of that we should judge the all the same ...or should we? The majority of immigrants have brought good things rather than bad to canada, and yet if some of them misbehave we point the finger to the whole group of their race. I am amazed at how ignorant we can get when we follow our predujices. I have volunteered at the young offenders centre where I live and out of the lot- there is only one or two immigrant kids. The rest are white. I have worked at the rehab center for people claiming worker's comp and there was three coloured people who were really in pain...the rest of the 150 people there where white and I can assure you some of them were faking it. When people misbehave it is not a matter of racial inclination, but a matter of personal lack of integrity. This is not in people's genes, but it is a matter of personal choice. I am sure that if we as Canadians saw what is done in our name internationally we would be appaled...yet we hope that those who are disadvataged from our international policies or our corporations will know that most of us are generally fair people.

We hardly need to be exporting people at this time? Again, you show how little you know about your own country. Homeless people are NOT going to support your pension plan when you retire. You want to know why Canada brings immigrants? its not because we are kind and good, but because we need them. Immigrants are an ECONOMIC INVESTMENT. We need their labour so that people like you can have a chance at having a better life when you get older. We need them so we can sustain social programs for single parent families or to support an unfair war. If you want to rely on the homeless, which in their mayority are out there because they are hooked on something or simply are not socially stable, that is up to you. Very few cases of homelessness in canada are the result of actual poverty. And again, for them to have a chance, we need the money that comes from the taxes of hard working immigrants. Either that or white canadians need to start being indoctrinated into having more babies. If not, you better get used to the idea that eventually a non-white will be part of your family :).

Do approving Asians make you feel less racist? Have you heard of the chinese mafia? oh but if we used your standard we should keep all asians out no matter what contribution most of them have made. Immigrating to canada is not a piece of cake, and I can assure you that if immigrants did not feel insecure in their countries of origin they would never choose to immigrate to canada. Isnt that what happened with Europe? once they were stable they refused to come. What makes us think that immigrants would choose to come to a country that is cold, where they will be singled out and considered liches no matter how hard they work?

And isnt it an irony for people like yourself that the very fact that Canada is allowing immigrants to this country is BECAUSE they are trying to take care of their own people??
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
In the 1980s the tories increased immigration. There was no vote, just a bureaucratic agreement to do so among elites. However the public seems to generally agree with immigration. I think it's okay, but 250,000 is too high, since most go to the cities and compete for labour, always good for capital. I think 100,000 per year is good to stimulate growth and excitement. Plus immigrants buy lots of new stuff like houses. Too much of anything is bad, usually.

Anyhow, when peak oil hits, and gas is $3-5 a litre, immigration will crash.
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
In the 1980s the tories increased immigration. There was no vote, just a bureaucratic agreement to do so among elites. However the public seems to generally agree with immigration. I think it's okay, but 250,000 is too high, since most go to the cities and compete for labour, always good for capital. I think 100,000 per year is good to stimulate growth and excitement. Plus immigrants buy lots of new stuff like houses. Too much of anything is bad, usually.

Anyhow, when peak oil hits, and gas is $3-5 a litre, immigration will crash.

I think not.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
I think not what? Gas won't keep rising? I checked Wikipedia and found in 2007, 71 million vehicles were sold worldwide-cars and trucks. This does not include tractors or lawnmowers. Peak oil is here ladies and germs.

Or that immigration is going to crash when this happens? As the price of oil rises our standard of living falls for the most part. So immigrants become redundant as jobs decrease. Immigration isn't just about foreign aid and foreign policy.

Or that it is a fact there was no major debate on increasing immigration numbers in the 1980s? This debate, where if you oppose immigration, you're racist, is so lame.