| View Poll Results: Do you think that Harper is: | |||
| In love with Bush but too shy to say? |    | 1 | 12.50% |
| Is jealous of Tony Blair and Bush's sleepovers? |    | 4 | 50.00% |
| Wanting to plan a romantic weekend at Camp David with Bush? |    | 3 | 37.50% |
| Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll | |||
Newbie
Posts: 17 
Location: Winnipeg
Location: Winnipeg
August 3rd, 2006, 08:00 PM
It's real easy to find a non-polluted link yourself.
1. Go to www.google.com
2. Write in Tamil Tigers, LTTE, or perhaps terrorism.
3. Pick a link, there were quite a few. One of them must conform to your approval list.
The LTTE do in fact have their own website, though it's been at least 3 years since I saw it.
Sorry, I know this really does not at all relate to the original thread, just have to throw it out there.
It's real easy to find a non-polluted link yourself.
1. Go to www.google.com
2. Write in Tamil Tigers, LTTE, or perhaps terrorism.
3. Pick a link, there were quite a few. One of them must conform to your approval list.
The LTTE do in fact have their own website, though it's been at least 3 years since I saw it.
Sorry, I know this really does not at all relate to the original thread, just have to throw it out there.
Member
Posts: 197
Location: Sarnia, Ontario
Location: Sarnia, Ontario
August 5th, 2006, 10:50 AM
Quoting
I'd have to go with 2, although it doesn't make alot of sense. Yes, I hate hateful people and hateful policies such as Harper, Israel and America's. Hope this clears it up.
Caleb-Dain Matton
are you a:
1) hating hateful hater
2) hurtful hatemonger of hate
3) moron
answer honestly
are you a:
1) hating hateful hater
2) hurtful hatemonger of hate
3) moron
answer honestly
Super Genius
Posts: 1,274
August 5th, 2006, 01:47 PM
I think the point was that our PM is more interested in being pals with the great powerfull Bush cabal than in representing the majority of Canadian opinion.
Harper is a warmonger,and a fossil fool , and is therefore leading us towards, rather than away from the two greatest threats we have now - global warming and global warfare between Islam and Christian Radicals.
But that would be off topic. The honest anwer is that none of the above apply to any of the polls here today!! Harper is A Bush Brownnoser, but I doubt if anything sexual is taking place, lol.
Besides, who could kiss that Condom-leaser Rice?
I think the point was that our PM is more interested in being pals with the great powerfull Bush cabal than in representing the majority of Canadian opinion.
Harper is a warmonger,and a fossil fool , and is therefore leading us towards, rather than away from the two greatest threats we have now - global warming and global warfare between Islam and Christian Radicals.
But that would be off topic. The honest anwer is that none of the above apply to any of the polls here today!! Harper is A Bush Brownnoser, but I doubt if anything sexual is taking place, lol.
Besides, who could kiss that Condom-leaser Rice?
Metal King
Posts: 1,028 
Location: Golden Horseshoe, Ontario
Location: Golden Horseshoe, Ontario
August 5th, 2006, 04:58 PM
Ahh.. quick observation which I think is relevant to this-
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
Ahh.. quick observation which I think is relevant to this-
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
Senate Member
Posts: 5,591
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
August 5th, 2006, 05:19 PM
I was SO relieved to be rid of government by finger in the breeze when the Conservatives won the last election. I am even more pleased with them now that they are holding to a principled stand, even though it might be costing them politically. Many kudos to Harper et. al.
As for our mission in Afghanistan, I see the goal of stabilizing that fractious nation as a little pie-in-the-sky, but worth the attempt. If we are not successful, at least we will have succeeded in what is essentially a holding action, preventing the Taliban from returning to power and Afghanistan becoming Training and Control Central for whatever bunch of Islamist loonys fell like getting 72 virgins this month.
As for stabilizing the country? I would be surprized, and very pleased, if that happened in my lifetime.
Quoting
So, if we are to be ruled by polls, why do we need a government at all? Hell, we'll just turn the whole mess over to Angus-Reid, and live happily ever after.
Ahh.. quick observation which I think is relevant to this-
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
I was SO relieved to be rid of government by finger in the breeze when the Conservatives won the last election. I am even more pleased with them now that they are holding to a principled stand, even though it might be costing them politically. Many kudos to Harper et. al.
As for our mission in Afghanistan, I see the goal of stabilizing that fractious nation as a little pie-in-the-sky, but worth the attempt. If we are not successful, at least we will have succeeded in what is essentially a holding action, preventing the Taliban from returning to power and Afghanistan becoming Training and Control Central for whatever bunch of Islamist loonys fell like getting 72 virgins this month.
As for stabilizing the country? I would be surprized, and very pleased, if that happened in my lifetime.
Genius
Posts: 931
August 5th, 2006, 05:33 PM
Quoting
So, if we are to be ruled by polls, why do we need a government at all? Hell, we'll just turn the whole mess over to Angus-Reid, and live happily ever after.
I was SO relieved to be rid of government by finger in the breeze when the Conservatives won the last election. I am even more pleased with them now that they are holding to a principled stand, even though it might be costing them politically. Many kudos to Harper et. al.
Did you not see my other thread? Harper does seem to be chaning his mind baed on the polls. Link So, if we are to be ruled by polls, why do we need a government at all? Hell, we'll just turn the whole mess over to Angus-Reid, and live happily ever after.
I was SO relieved to be rid of government by finger in the breeze when the Conservatives won the last election. I am even more pleased with them now that they are holding to a principled stand, even though it might be costing them politically. Many kudos to Harper et. al.
Electoral Member
Posts: 408
Location: hopelessly entagled
Location: hopelessly entagled
August 5th, 2006, 09:32 PM
I found the question in this thread amusing. I believe caleb is trying to be funny--which is splendid. I dont see the homophobia alluded to . Im no fan of Harper, but if he is in love with Bush and or Blair --that is his business--I would not hold that against him. Same sex relationships between international state terrrorists is a reality we might all have to accept--now that Maggie and Liz are getting too old and frail to pull their tricks for the good old boys.
I found the question in this thread amusing. I believe caleb is trying to be funny--which is splendid. I dont see the homophobia alluded to . Im no fan of Harper, but if he is in love with Bush and or Blair --that is his business--I would not hold that against him. Same sex relationships between international state terrrorists is a reality we might all have to accept--now that Maggie and Liz are getting too old and frail to pull their tricks for the good old boys.
Clever Clogs
Posts: 526
Location: Pointy Rocks
Location: Pointy Rocks
August 6th, 2006, 11:30 AM
I can't wait till GWB is out of office so that all the the Bush-wackers will have to find something/ someone else to blame the worlds problems on.
I don't think Bush is the puppetmaster of the globe. If Harper takes a stance on something, right or wrong, I have to hold him accountable not bush I don't vote for bush.
I can't wait till GWB is out of office so that all the the Bush-wackers will have to find something/ someone else to blame the worlds problems on.
I don't think Bush is the puppetmaster of the globe. If Harper takes a stance on something, right or wrong, I have to hold him accountable not bush I don't vote for bush.
