Chief Justice Backs Harper

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
CHIEF JUSTICE SURPRISE SUPPORTER OF PULIC VETTING


Janice Tibbetts, CanWest News Service
Published: Tuesday, April 11, 2006

OTTAWA - Canada's chief justice has thrown her substantial support behind a Conservative plan for publicly vetting Supreme Court contenders, saying a recent hearing on the newest inductee gave Canadians a chance to learn more about judges.

Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin's unexpected endorsement, delivered yesterday at a courtroom welcome for Justice Marshall Rothstein, makes her one of the few judges who has praised the public process, adopted by the Harper Conservatives to shed more light on a system that has been maligned for its secrecy.

Her comments also came only months after she warned against tainting the appointment process with politics to preserve public confidence in the independence of the judiciary.

Judge Rothstein was subjected six weeks ago to the first public hearing for Supreme Court contenders in Canadian history, when he was quizzed for three hours by a panel of MPs from all parties. Employing a blend of common sense, humour and a down-to-earth touch, he asserted that the proper role of a judge is to apply the law, rather than make it, and leave social policy to governments.

"We, on this court, of course, watched with great interest as the appointment process unfolded," Chief Justice McLachlin said. "At the end of the day, those who watched the hearing were united in their belief that it provided Canadians with an opportunity to get to know more about the respective roles and obligations of the government and the judiciary."

She noted that the committee "avoided partisan questioning of the candidate."

Critics of public hearings, including the Canadian Bar Association representing the country's lawyers, say they could give the impression judges are beholden to Parliament and deteriorate into a free-for-all such as some judicial confirmation hearings in the United States.

Chief Justice McLachlin also said the process gave Canadians a glimpse into the life of Judge Rothstein, a 65-year-old former Federal Court of Appeal judge who worked his way up from humble beginnings as the only son of Eastern European immigrants to become one of the brightest legal minds in the country.

Judge Rothstein made little mention of the inaugural hearing yesterday, electing instead to give a breezy speech to a packed courtroom that included legal dignitaries, his family and friends. He said it was only the second time in the 14 years he and his wife have lived in Ottawa that all of their four children have come to town at the same time. "Look at what I have to do to get them all here."

© National Post 2006
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
McLachlin's Support for New Process

I would agree with the Right Honourable Beverly McLachlin, P.C., the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, in that this process turned out to be more of a positive thing than I think any of the skeptics (I would have been most definitely included in the "skeptics" category, by the way). I think many citizens were worried that the ad hoc committee would have turned into a partisan interrogation, as we have seen occur in the United States of America in respect of their own nomination and appointment process.

I was happy to see the parties (with the exception of a certain member of the New Democratic Party of Canada, whom I thought should have been ashamed of his conduct during the hearing) question the Honourable Justice Marshall Rothstein, now a Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, with such enthusiasm and respect, and I was overjoyed to see such a conscious effort being made to avoid partisan questioning, and to ensure that Justice Rothstein was comfortable with the questions being asked.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Heh, really?

Hehe, really, I think not? I did like the article, but how'd you predict that?

Anyways, I am behind the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, P.C., M.P., the Member for Calgary Southwest and the Prime Minister of Canada on his appointment of Justice Rothstein one hundred percent — this has been a superb appointment, in my opinion, and the process that he proposed and executed to shed light on the process was, in my opinion, a resounding success.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
You are slowly becoming one of us Five.....soon you will leave the dark side. :)
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: Heh, really?

FiveParadox said:
Hehe, really, I think not? I did like the article, but how'd you predict that?

It makes reference to the Supreme Court, which sole purpose is to interpret the Constitution of Canada, which I know, you like to reference. :wink:
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Haha, no, Jay — I just have no problem admitting when another party does something good. I think I have been quite generous to this Government, in terms of my praise for the things they have done appropriately and successfully.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Chief Justice Backs Harper

FiveParadox said:
Haha, no, Jay — I just have no problem admitting when another party does something good. I think I have been quite generous to this Government, in terms of my praise for the things they have done appropriately and successfully.

Thinking of going into law, Five?

My guess would be "yes".